Skip to content

Did a 73 Year Old Woman Give Birth to Twins in India?

5 min read

In 2019, a woman in India named Erramatti Mangayamma became the center of a global news story when it was reported that the 73 year old woman gave birth to twins. This extraordinary event, achieved through in vitro fertilization (IVF), has since reignited public debate about the possibilities and ethical considerations of advanced maternal age pregnancies.

Quick Summary

In 2019, Erramatti Mangayamma, an Indian woman reportedly aged 73, gave birth to twin girls via cesarean section after undergoing IVF treatment using a donor egg and her husband's sperm.

Key Points

  • Confirmed Case: In 2019, an Indian woman named Erramatti Mangayamma gave birth to twins at the reported age of 73, making her one of the oldest mothers on record.

  • IVF-Assisted Conception: The pregnancy was not natural but achieved through in vitro fertilization (IVF) using a donor egg.

  • High Medical Risks: Advanced-age pregnancies carry significant risks for the mother, including gestational diabetes and preeclampsia, and often require a cesarean section.

  • Medical and Ethical Debates: The case prompted renewed debate within the medical community and among ethicists about the age limits for fertility treatments.

  • Distinction from Natural Pregnancy: The IVF process bypasses the natural biological limitations that make conception impossible for women past menopause.

  • Motivations for Late-Life Parenthood: Mangayamma and her husband pursued fertility treatment after decades of trying unsuccessfully to conceive and facing social stigma.

In This Article

The Story Behind the Oldest Mother to Give Birth to Twins

In a case that drew international attention, Erramatti Mangayamma from the state of Andhra Pradesh, India, made headlines in September 2019. After struggling with infertility for decades, she and her 80-year-old husband, E. Raja Rao, turned to in vitro fertilization (IVF) to have children. This decision followed years of social ostracism for not being able to conceive naturally.

After a successful IVF cycle using a donor egg and her husband's sperm, Mangayamma became pregnant with twins. Due to her advanced age, she remained under close medical supervision throughout the pregnancy. The babies, two healthy girls, were delivered via a cesarean section.

The Medical and Ethical Context of Late-Life Pregnancy

While Mangayamma's story is a powerful narrative of hope and perseverance, it also raises significant medical and ethical questions about advanced-age pregnancies. The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), particularly with donor eggs, has made pregnancy possible for women far past their natural reproductive years. This has challenged societal norms and the medical community's guidelines regarding who should receive such treatments.

From a medical standpoint, pregnancies at an advanced maternal age carry increased risks, including:

  • Higher risk of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes: The risk of developing these and other health complications increases with age.
  • Need for Caesarean delivery: The likelihood of complications often makes C-sections the safest option for both mother and baby.
  • Increased risks for the baby: These include premature birth, low birth weight, and chromosomal abnormalities, although the use of a younger donor egg can mitigate the latter.

Comparing Older Mothers: IVF vs. Natural Conception

It is crucial to distinguish between IVF-assisted pregnancies and those conceived naturally when discussing advanced maternal age. A woman's natural fertility declines significantly after her mid-30s, becoming highly unlikely by age 45. Natural conception at ages over 50 is extremely rare and typically involves an unusual biological event. IVF, conversely, bypasses the age-related decline in egg quality by using donor eggs from much younger women, fertilizing them, and transferring them to the recipient's uterus.

Aspect Naturally Conceived Pregnancy (Post-45) IVF-Assisted Pregnancy (Post-45)
Likelihood Extremely rare, almost impossible after 45. Possible with reproductive assistance, depending on clinic and health factors.
Egg Source Mother's own aging eggs, with lower quantity and quality. Donor eggs from a younger woman, circumventing age-related egg quality issues.
Pregnancy Risks High risk of chromosomal abnormalities (e.g., Down syndrome), miscarriage, and other complications due to egg quality. Increased maternal health risks (preeclampsia, diabetes) due to advanced age; risks to fetus are largely influenced by donor egg quality.
Ethical Considerations Primarily personal and medical decisions based on individual health. Raises broader ethical debates about age limits, resource allocation, and the well-being of a child with aging parents.

A Deeper Look into the Ethical Debates

Mangayamma's case, along with others of similar age, sparked a conversation among medical professionals and ethicists. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) has issued guidelines discouraging the use of donor eggs for women over 55, citing concerns about maternal and fetal safety, as well as the parents' ability to raise a child to adulthood. However, others argue that access to fertility treatment is a fundamental human right and that each case should be assessed on individual health and support systems, not age alone.

This debate underscores a central tension in modern medicine: the extent to which technology should push the boundaries of what is naturally possible. While some see advanced-age pregnancy as a medical triumph and the fulfillment of a long-held dream, others view it as an irresponsible and potentially dangerous use of medical resources, which may place both the mother and child at unnecessary risk.

Conclusion

Yes, the story of a 73-year-old woman giving birth to twins is factually accurate, though it was only possible through a series of significant medical interventions. The case of Erramatti Mangayamma highlights the remarkable progress in assisted reproductive technology, but it also brings to the forefront complex medical and ethical discussions. It serves as a real-world example of the opportunities and challenges that arise when science extends the limits of human biology. While successful outcomes are possible with careful medical monitoring, the journey is fraught with risks and difficult considerations for all involved.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did a 73 year old woman give birth to twins naturally? No, the 73-year-old woman, Erramatti Mangayamma, did not conceive naturally. Pregnancy at this age is not naturally possible. She became pregnant through in vitro fertilization (IVF), using a donor egg.

Who is the world's oldest woman to give birth? While multiple claims exist, Erramatti Mangayamma from India is widely cited as the oldest person to give birth, delivering twins at the reported age of 73 in 2019. A definitive, globally verified record can be difficult due to variations in documentation and reporting.

Is it medically safe for a 73-year-old to give birth? Pregnancy at such an advanced age carries significant medical risks, including higher chances of complications like preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and the need for a C-section. Mangayamma's pregnancy was considered high-risk and required extensive medical supervision.

What assisted reproductive technology was used in this case? Erramatti Mangayamma became pregnant using in vitro fertilization (IVF). She used a donor egg, which was fertilized with her husband's sperm, as she had gone through menopause decades earlier.

What happens to the babies when their parents are much older? Some ethicists and medical professionals voice concerns about the long-term welfare of children born to very elderly parents. Questions arise about who will care for the children as the parents age further, as well as the emotional and social implications for the children.

Why would a woman in her 70s decide to have children? In Mangayamma's case, she and her husband had long desired children and faced social stigma due to their infertility. After seeing a neighbor successfully undergo IVF, they were motivated to try the procedure themselves.

What are the ethical concerns surrounding IVF for women over 55? The American Society for Reproductive Medicine discourages fertility treatment for women over 55. This is due to concerns regarding maternal and fetal safety, as well as the psychological and social implications for the child, who may lose their parents early in life. The practice also sparks broader debates about the limits of medical intervention and resource allocation.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, the 73-year-old woman, Erramatti Mangayamma, did not conceive naturally. She became pregnant through in vitro fertilization (IVF), a process that used a donor egg and her husband's sperm.

While multiple claims exist, Erramatti Mangayamma from India is widely cited as the oldest person to give birth, delivering twins at the reported age of 73 in 2019. A definitive, globally verified record can be difficult due to variations in documentation and reporting.

Pregnancy at such an advanced age carries significant medical risks for the mother, including higher chances of complications like preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and the need for a C-section. Mangayamma's pregnancy was considered high-risk and required extensive medical supervision.

Erramatti Mangayamma became pregnant using in vitro fertilization (IVF). She used a donor egg, which was fertilized with her husband's sperm, as she had gone through menopause decades earlier.

Some ethicists and medical professionals voice concerns about the long-term welfare of children born to very elderly parents. Questions arise about who will care for the children as the parents age further, as well as the emotional and social implications for the children.

In Mangayamma's case, she and her husband had long desired children and faced social stigma due to their infertility. After seeing a neighbor successfully undergo IVF, they were motivated to try the procedure themselves.

The American Society for Reproductive Medicine discourages fertility treatment for women over 55. This is due to concerns regarding maternal and fetal safety, as well as the psychological and social implications for the child, who may lose their parents early in life. The practice also sparks broader debates about the limits of medical intervention and resource allocation.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.