Skip to content

How do AirTags track elderly people? A Guide for Caregivers

4 min read

According to the Alzheimer's Association, 6.5 million Americans age 65 and older were living with Alzheimer’s dementia in 2022, with wandering a significant safety risk. This statistic highlights why many caregivers are researching how do AirTags track elderly people?. However, the answer is more complex than it seems, involving significant ethical considerations, privacy risks, and practical limitations that all caregivers must understand before relying on this technology.

Quick Summary

AirTags track by sending a secure Bluetooth signal that is detected by nearby devices on Apple's 'Find My' network. These devices then anonymously relay the AirTag's location to iCloud, allowing the owner to see it on a map. This system is not true real-time GPS and carries serious ethical and reliability limitations when used for tracking people, especially the vulnerable.

Key Points

  • Indirect Tracking: AirTags don't use built-in GPS but instead send Bluetooth signals to nearby Apple devices on the 'Find My' network.

  • Unreliable for Real-Time Use: Tracking is delayed and inconsistent, relying on passing Apple devices. It is not suitable for emergencies where immediate location is needed.

  • Significant Privacy Issues: Using an AirTag to track a person without full consent raises ethical and privacy concerns, particularly with individuals experiencing cognitive decline.

  • Anti-Stalking Features Are a Problem: Built-in safety measures like audible alerts are intended to prevent tracking but can confuse or distress an elderly person.

  • Superior Alternatives Exist: Dedicated senior GPS trackers offer more reliable, real-time tracking, geofencing alerts, and emergency features designed specifically for elder care.

In This Article

The Core Technology: How AirTags Work

To understand the limitations of using AirTags for senior care, it's essential to first grasp how they operate. Unlike dedicated GPS trackers that use satellite data and cellular networks, AirTags rely on a crowdsourced system called the 'Find My' network.

The 'Find My' Network Explained

  • Secure Bluetooth Signals: Each AirTag emits a secure Bluetooth signal that can be detected by any nearby Apple device (iPhone, iPad, Mac) that is part of the 'Find My' network.
  • Anonymous and Encrypted: The location data relayed by these devices is anonymous and encrypted. The Apple device owner nearby is not aware they are helping, and the information is sent securely to iCloud.
  • Location Relay to Owner: The owner of the AirTag can then see its location on a map in their 'Find My' app, thanks to the aggregated data from all the Apple devices it has passed by.
  • No Built-in GPS: Crucially, the AirTag itself does not contain a GPS chip. Its accuracy and frequency of updates are entirely dependent on how many Apple devices are in its vicinity. In a busy city, updates may be frequent, but in a rural area, updates can be sporadic or non-existent.

Practical and Ethical Limitations for Senior Tracking

Apple explicitly states that AirTags were not designed for tracking people, and they have implemented safeguards to prevent misuse. These features are critical to consider when evaluating their suitability for tracking an elderly person.

Challenges and Risks

  • Anti-Stalking Features: If an AirTag is separated from its owner for an extended period and is traveling with another person, that person's iPhone will receive an alert. The AirTag will also begin to play a sound to draw attention to its presence. For a senior with cognitive decline, this could cause confusion or distress, or they may simply disable the alert or remove the device.
  • Inconsistent Tracking: Because the tracking relies on the proximity of other Apple devices, the location updates are not consistent or real-time. This is a major disadvantage in an emergency where seconds matter. A person who wanders may not be in range of an Apple device, leaving a large gap in their known whereabouts.
  • Invasion of Privacy: Using a tracking device on an elderly person, even with good intentions, raises serious ethical questions about their autonomy and privacy, especially if they have dementia. Consent is a key factor, and communication is vital. In many jurisdictions, tracking someone without their consent is illegal.
  • Easy to Lose or Remove: AirTags are small and can be attached to keychains or bags. However, they can be easily lost, misplaced, or even removed by the senior, rendering them useless for tracking. This is a significant risk compared to a purpose-built wearable tracker.

Comparison: AirTags vs. Dedicated Senior GPS Trackers

To illustrate the shortcomings of AirTags for elder care, here is a comparison with dedicated GPS trackers designed for this purpose.

Feature Apple AirTags Dedicated Senior GPS Trackers
Technology Bluetooth-based 'Find My' network Real-time GPS, Cellular, Wi-Fi
Real-Time Tracking Delayed, relies on nearby Apple devices Live, continuous updates via cellular network
Geofencing No built-in alerts for leaving a zone Yes, customizable safety zones with instant alerts
Consent Features Anti-stalking alerts (can be shared via iOS 17) Designed for consensual, monitored tracking
Emergency Features No panic/SOS button or fall detection Includes dedicated SOS button, optional fall detection
Battery Life Long (approx. 1 year), replaceable Shorter (days/weeks), rechargeable
Affordability Low initial cost Higher initial cost + monthly subscription
Primary Use Finding lost items (keys, bags) Senior safety, medical alert, real-time location

Responsible Alternatives for Senior Tracking

Given the limitations of AirTags, caregivers should explore alternatives specifically designed for senior safety. These options provide more reliable, consistent, and feature-rich tracking, along with emergency support.

Dedicated GPS Trackers

  • Wearable Pendants and Watches: These devices are specifically designed for seniors, often featuring large SOS buttons, fall detection, and two-way communication capabilities. Examples include products from Tracki or AngelSense.
  • Location-Based Monitoring Services: Many systems include a monitoring service that can immediately respond to an emergency signal, contacting both family members and emergency services.

Other Safety Measures

  • Medical Alert Systems: Beyond tracking, these systems provide a direct line to emergency services with the push of a button, offering peace of mind for both the senior and their caregivers.
  • Smart Home Technology: Consider using motion sensors or smart locks to monitor movement patterns and ensure a senior returns home safely. This can offer a less invasive form of monitoring than constant tracking.
  • Open Communication: The most important tool remains open and honest communication with the elderly person about their safety needs and the tools used to support them. Ensuring they are part of the decision-making process is both ethical and empowering.

Conclusion: Making an Informed Decision

While the concept of using a low-cost, discreet AirTag to track an elderly loved one seems appealing, the reality is that the technology is an imperfect and potentially inappropriate tool for this purpose. The reliance on nearby Apple devices for location updates, combined with anti-stalking features and privacy concerns, makes it an unreliable choice for monitoring vulnerable individuals. For true safety and peace of mind, caregivers should invest in dedicated senior GPS tracking devices or other medically-focused safety solutions that offer reliable, real-time tracking and emergency features. The safety and dignity of the senior must always be the top priority, and that starts with making an informed decision about the technology used to protect them. The National Institute on Aging provides further resources on safe aging at home National Institute on Aging.

Frequently Asked Questions

While technically possible, it is not recommended due to significant ethical and practical limitations. AirTags were not designed for tracking people, and their reliance on a crowdsourced network makes them an unreliable solution for monitoring vulnerable individuals in real-time.

The accuracy depends on the density of Apple devices around the AirTag. In a crowded city, updates may be relatively frequent, but in a rural or less populated area, updates could be delayed by hours or fail entirely, making them less dependable than dedicated GPS trackers.

Yes. If an AirTag is separated from its owner and travels with another person, that person's iPhone will receive an anti-stalking notification. After a period, the AirTag will also play a sound. This could be confusing or upsetting for a senior with cognitive issues.

Yes, dedicated senior GPS trackers are a much better choice. These devices, often in the form of pendants or watches, use real-time GPS and cellular networks, offer features like geofencing and SOS buttons, and are specifically designed for the safety of seniors.

Tracking a person without their full, informed consent can be a serious invasion of privacy and is illegal in many places. It is important to have an open conversation about safety and to respect the individual's autonomy, even if they have cognitive decline.

Their functionality is severely limited. Without nearby Apple devices to relay the Bluetooth signal, the AirTag will not update its location, and you may only see its last known location, which could be hours or days old. This makes them unsuitable for use in rural or less populated environments.

Apple advises against it due to ethical concerns and the device's design limitations. They built anti-stalking features into the system to prevent misuse. The AirTag is simply not the right tool for the job when a person's safety is at stake.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.