Accurately scoring a geriatric anxiety scale requires careful attention to the specific version of the tool being used, as there are distinct differences between the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) and the Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS). Both are valuable tools for measuring anxiety in older adults, but their scoring procedures and interpretation differ. A solid understanding of these methods ensures a reliable assessment for identifying, monitoring, and managing anxiety in the elderly.
Scoring the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI)
The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) is a 20-item self-report scale designed for older adults, including those with mild cognitive impairment. It is characterized by its simple dichotomous (agree/disagree) response format.
Scoring methodology
To score the GAI, simply sum the responses where the individual's answer indicates an anxiety symptom. The scoring process is as follows:
- Response format: Each of the 20 items is answered with a "True" or "False" (or "Agree" / "Disagree") response.
- Assigning points: For each item, assign one point (1) for an answer that aligns with an anxiety symptom and zero points (0) for an answer that does not.
- Calculate the total score: Sum all the points to get a final score. The total score will range from 0 to 20, with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety symptoms.
Interpreting GAI scores
Clinicians use specific cutoff points to interpret the severity of anxiety, although these can vary slightly across studies.
- Score of 8 or 9 and above: This is often used as a cut-point for identifying any anxiety disorder.
- Score of 10 or 11 and above: Some studies use this as a cutoff for identifying probable cases of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).
- Clinical context: Interpretation should always incorporate clinical judgment, as cutoffs are merely a guide.
Scoring the Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS)
The Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS) is a 30-item questionnaire that is also widely used, with 25 items contributing to the total score. Unlike the GAI's binary format, the GAS uses a Likert scale, allowing for a more nuanced measure of symptom frequency.
Scoring methodology
Scoring the GAS involves calculating a total score from the first 25 items only.
- Response format: Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale, indicating how often the symptom was experienced in the past week:
- 0 = Not at all
- 1 = Several days
- 2 = More than half the days
- 3 = All of the time
- Calculate the total score: Add the scores for the first 25 items to calculate the total score. The total score will range from 0 to 75.
- Clinical consideration for extra items: Items 26–30 are not included in the total score but provide valuable clinical insights into specific areas of worry common in older adults, such as health and finances.
Interpreting GAS scores
The total score for the GAS is used to classify the severity of anxiety:
- Low or minimal anxiety: A total score between 0 and 25.
- Moderate anxiety: A total score between 26 and 50.
- High or severe anxiety: A total score between 51 and 75.
Comparison of the GAI and GAS scoring methods
| Feature | Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) | Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of items scored | 20 items | 25 items (from a 30-item scale) |
| Response format | Dichotomous (Agree/Disagree or True/False) | 4-point Likert scale (0-3 for frequency) |
| Total score range | 0 to 20 | 0 to 75 |
| Scoring process | Sum of all "True" or "Agree" responses. | Sum of Likert scale ratings for the first 25 items. |
| Interpretation of scores | Uses specific cutoffs for potential anxiety disorders, such as a score of 9+ for any anxiety disorder. | Uses score ranges to classify severity: minimal (0-25), moderate (26-50), and severe (51-75). |
| Target population | Designed for older adults, including those with mild cognitive impairment due to simple response format. | Widely validated across community, psychiatric, and medical older adult samples. |
Clinical considerations for interpreting scores
While scoring a geriatric anxiety scale provides a quantitative measure, interpreting the result requires clinical context. Healthcare professionals must consider several factors alongside the score:
- Presence of medical conditions: Many physical illnesses common in older adults can mimic anxiety symptoms, making careful diagnosis essential.
- Overlap with depression: Both the GAI and GAS show some overlap with depression measures, highlighting the need to assess for both conditions.
- Cognitive impairment: The GAI is particularly well-suited for individuals with mild cognitive impairment due to its simple format.
- Qualitative information: The five unscored items on the GAS can offer additional insight into specific patient worries, such as financial or health concerns.
- Serial administration: Monitoring scores over time can help track a patient's response to treatment and adjust care plans.
Conclusion
To score a geriatric anxiety scale, it is essential to first identify the correct tool, whether it's the GAI or the GAS. For the GAI, one must sum the 20 dichotomous items for a total score up to 20, using cutoffs for clinical significance. For the GAS, the total score from 25 of its 30 items is summed to a total of 75, which is then mapped to minimal, moderate, or severe anxiety categories. Regardless of the scale, combining the numerical score with professional clinical judgment provides the most complete and effective assessment for managing anxiety in older adults.