Skip to content

Is it better to retire at 62-65 or 67? A comprehensive guide to your options

3 min read

According to the Social Security Administration, 62 is the most popular age to claim retirement benefits, but this decision has lifelong consequences for your finances. Understanding the trade-offs is crucial when asking, Is it better to retire at 62-65 or 67?

Quick Summary

Deciding to retire at 62, 65, or 67 is a highly personal choice balancing financial security, health, and lifestyle goals, as each age presents a unique set of pros and cons, especially concerning Social Security benefits and savings longevity. The optimal time for one person may not be the same for another.

Key Points

  • Social Security Benefits: Claiming at 62 reduces benefits by up to 30%; waiting until 67 provides 100% [1].

  • Medicare Eligibility: Retiring before 65 requires private health insurance until age 65 [1].

  • Health and Longevity: Health and anticipated lifespan are crucial in deciding if early claiming or delaying benefits is better [1].

  • Savings and Investments: Earlier retirement means savings must last longer [1].

  • Lifestyle and Goals: The choice depends on whether you prioritize immediate freedom or long-term financial security [1].

  • Delaying Past FRA: Waiting until age 70 further increases monthly Social Security benefits [1].

In This Article

Understanding Full Retirement Age (FRA) and Benefit Levels

For anyone born in 1960 or later, the full retirement age (FRA) for Social Security is 67 [1]. This is the age at which you are entitled to 100% of your earned benefit, based on your lifetime earnings. The timing of when you begin to collect these benefits, relative to your FRA, significantly impacts your monthly Social Security payout [1]. Claiming early results in a permanent reduction, while delaying past FRA increases benefits up to age 70 [1].

Retiring at 62: The Appeal of Early Freedom

Retiring at 62 offers early freedom but comes with substantial financial implications [1]. Claiming Social Security at this age permanently reduces your monthly benefit by up to 30% [1]. This means your personal savings must cover living expenses for a longer period, and you'll need to pay for health insurance until Medicare eligibility at 65 [1].

Considerations for a 62 retirement:

  • Permanent reduction in Social Security benefits [1].
  • Higher reliance on personal savings for income [1].
  • Need for private health insurance before Medicare [1].
  • More years to enjoy retirement actively [1].

Retiring at 65: The Medicare and Savings Sweet Spot

Retiring at 65 is a balanced approach. You become eligible for Medicare, addressing the health insurance gap [1]. While Social Security benefits are still reduced compared to waiting until 67, the reduction is smaller than at 62 (about 13.3% for those with a 67 FRA) [1]. This allows for continued saving and potentially benefiting from employer contributions [1].

Retiring at 67: The Full Benefit Advantage

For those born in 1960 or later, retiring at 67 means receiving your full, unreduced Social Security benefit [1]. This provides the highest monthly payment available at your FRA [1]. Working until 67 also allows more time to grow retirement savings [1]. The trade-off is spending more years in the workforce compared to retiring earlier [1].

Comparison of Retirement Ages: 62 vs. 65 vs. 67

Factor Retiring at 62 Retiring at 65 Retiring at 67 (FRA)
Monthly Social Security Benefit Permanently reduced by up to 30% [1] Reduced by about 13.3% [1] 100% of your full benefit [1]
Lifetime Social Security Income Depends on longevity [1]. Balance between early and delayed claiming [1]. May be highest if you live into your late 70s or beyond [1].
Private Healthcare Costs Potentially significant gap until Medicare at 65 [1]. Eligible for Medicare coverage [1]. Eligible for Medicare coverage [1].
Personal Savings Longevity Needs to last for a longer period [1]. Needs to last for a shorter duration than if retiring at 62 [1]. Needs to last for the shortest duration [1].
Time to Save/Invest Less time for savings to grow [1]. More years to save [1]. Longest period to accumulate wealth [1].
Enjoying Retirement More active years, potentially with financial constraints [1]. Good balance, with more financial stability than at 62 [1]. Fewer years of retirement, but with maximum financial security [1].

The Non-Financial Factors: Health, Lifestyle, and Legacy

Beyond finances, health and family longevity are key [1]. If you anticipate a shorter lifespan, taking reduced benefits at 62 might result in a higher total payout [1]. Conversely, expecting a long life makes delaying benefits more advantageous [1]. Your desired lifestyle, partner's retirement plans, and potential survivor benefits also play a role [1].

Crafting Your Personal Retirement Strategy

Making an informed decision requires careful planning [1]. Utilizing online calculators and consulting a financial advisor can help model different scenarios [1]. Consider the trade-offs between lower monthly payments over a longer period versus higher payments over a shorter period [1]. Planning for healthcare costs, especially before Medicare eligibility, is also crucial [1]. A holistic view of your financial health, longevity expectations, and lifestyle goals is essential [1].

For more detailed information on your specific Social Security benefits and full retirement age, you can visit the Social Security Administration's website [1].

Conclusion

The question of is it better to retire at 62-65 or 67? is a personal one. The ideal age depends on your financial situation, health, and desired lifestyle [1]. Retiring at 62 offers early freedom but reduced Social Security benefits [1]. Age 65 provides a balance with Medicare eligibility [1]. Waiting until 67 or later offers maximum financial security from Social Security [1].

Frequently Asked Questions

For those born in 1960 or later, the full retirement age (FRA) for Social Security is 67 [1]. It's determined by your birth year and dictates when you receive 100% of benefits [1].

Claiming benefits at the earliest age, 62, results in a permanent reduction of up to 30% of your full benefit amount [1].

Yes, Medicare eligibility starts at 65 [1]. Retiring at 62, 63, or 64 means you need private health insurance or COBRA until you can enroll in Medicare [1].

If finances or health necessitate earlier retirement, claiming at 62 or 65 may be necessary despite reduced benefits [1]. Assess all financial resources before deciding [1].

Yes, a spouse's claiming strategy can impact yours, particularly regarding survivor benefits [1]. Delaying benefits if you're the higher earner can increase the potential survivor benefit for your spouse [1].

Delaying claiming past your full retirement age of 67 increases your monthly benefit [1]. Waiting until age 70 offers the highest possible monthly payout [1].

Working part-time can supplement income, keep you engaged, and potentially allow you to delay claiming Social Security for a larger benefit later [1].

References

  1. 1

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.