Skip to content

What is the average age discrimination settlement?

5 min read

According to the EEOC, thousands of age discrimination charges are filed annually by workers over 40. However, when considering what is the average age discrimination settlement, it's crucial to understand that a single figure is a significant oversimplification due to a wide range of influencing variables.

Quick Summary

The value of an age discrimination settlement is not fixed, but rather varies greatly based on numerous case-specific factors like evidence, lost wages, and the jurisdiction. While EEOC-mediated settlements may have a lower median, cases taken to court with a lawyer often result in substantially higher compensation.

Key Points

  • No Single Average: The average age discrimination settlement is highly misleading, with figures varying wildly based on case specifics, evidence, and legal representation.

  • Evidence is Everything: The strength of your evidence—including direct age-related comments or patterns of disparate treatment—is the most significant factor in determining settlement value.

  • Economic Damages are Key: Settlement calculations are built on a foundation of lost wages (back and front pay), benefits, and other financial losses.

  • Jurisdiction Matters: State laws can offer stronger protections and higher settlement potential, particularly for non-economic damages like emotional distress, compared to federal law.

  • Settlement vs. Trial: Negotiating a settlement offers a faster, lower-risk, and confidential resolution, while going to trial risks losing but offers the potential for a larger, public payout.

  • Document Everything: A strong case relies on meticulous documentation of all discriminatory incidents, communications, and employment records.

In This Article

The Misleading Nature of “Average” Figures

While it is tempting to seek a concrete number, defining the average age discrimination settlement is misleading. The value of a case depends on unique circumstances, state and federal law, and the strength of the evidence. For example, some sources cite the EEOC's median settlement for all discrimination types at around $40,000 to $60,000. However, this figure does not capture the high-end settlements reached in litigation, especially under state laws that do not cap damages. Cases involving significant financial loss, compelling evidence, and legal representation can reach hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of dollars.

Key Factors That Determine Settlement Value

Several critical factors influence how a settlement amount is calculated and negotiated. Understanding these elements provides a more accurate picture of a case's potential worth than relying on a general "average."

Strength of Evidence

The quality and amount of evidence are paramount. Strong evidence can include direct statements from supervisors referencing an employee's age, or circumstantial evidence that reveals a pattern of disparate treatment against older workers. Cases with clear, written proof of discriminatory intent are significantly stronger than those based on mere suspicion.

Economic Damages

This category forms the financial foundation of a settlement. It includes:

  • Back Pay: Wages and benefits lost from the time of the adverse employment action (e.g., termination, demotion) until the settlement is reached.
  • Front Pay: Projected future earnings lost if reinstatement to the job is not possible or desired. This is calculated based on expected career trajectory until retirement.
  • Lost Benefits: The value of health insurance, retirement contributions, bonuses, and other perks.

Non-Economic Damages

Non-economic damages compensate for the emotional and psychological toll of discrimination. This can include anxiety, depression, humiliation, and other forms of emotional distress. The value of these damages can vary significantly depending on jurisdiction. While federal law caps some damages based on company size, many state laws, like California's FEHA, do not have a cap, allowing for much higher compensation for emotional harm.

Employer's Conduct and Resources

If an employer's discriminatory actions were particularly egregious or malicious, a plaintiff may be eligible for punitive damages, which are meant to punish the employer and deter future misconduct. A company's financial resources also play a role; larger corporations often have greater ability to pay substantial settlements to avoid costly and public litigation.

Jurisdiction

State and local laws can offer stronger protections than federal law. For instance, the burden of proof for age discrimination can be lower under some state laws compared to the federal "but-for" standard. Understanding the laws in your specific location is crucial, as they can significantly impact potential damages.

The Settlement Process vs. Litigation

When faced with an age discrimination claim, a plaintiff has two primary paths: negotiating a settlement or proceeding to trial. Both have distinct advantages and disadvantages.

Comparing Settlement Paths

Feature Settlement (Negotiated) Litigation (Trial)
Timing Generally faster, often resolved in months. Much slower, can take years due to court schedules and appeals.
Cost Typically lower legal fees, especially if settled early. Higher legal and court fees, which can accumulate over time.
Risk Guaranteed outcome, as a settlement is a binding agreement. High risk, as a judge or jury could rule against the plaintiff entirely.
Confidentiality Most settlement agreements include confidentiality clauses. Public record, bringing negative attention to both parties.
Potential Payout Often lower than a maximum trial verdict, but guaranteed. Higher potential for large award, but also risk of zero recovery.

How to Build a Strong Age Discrimination Case

To maximize a settlement, or to prepare for litigation, building a strong case is essential. Here are key steps:

  • Document Everything: Keep a detailed journal of incidents, including dates, times, locations, and what was said or done. Save all relevant emails, texts, and other communications.
  • Gather Performance Records: Collect copies of positive performance reviews, commendations, and any documentation showing your competence in the role, especially from before the alleged discrimination began.
  • Identify Witnesses: Note any coworkers who observed discriminatory treatment and are willing to provide a statement. Keep their contact information.
  • Track Comparative Treatment: Document instances where younger employees in similar positions were treated differently, such as receiving promotions or less scrutiny for mistakes.
  • File Timely Complaints: Report discrimination through proper internal channels (e.g., HR) and meet all deadlines for filing with the EEOC or state agencies.

Common Misconceptions to Avoid

Many people misunderstand age discrimination and the settlement process. Being aware of these myths is crucial:

  • Misconception: Age discrimination is only obvious and intentional. Reality: Bias can be subtle, unconscious, and systemic, arising from policies that disproportionately affect older workers.
  • Misconception: You can't sue if the company has a strong retirement package. Reality: A severance package, especially if it requires signing away legal rights, is a common tactic employers use. It does not negate a discrimination claim.
  • Misconception: Settlements are always based on salary. Reality: While salary is a factor for lost wages, settlements also account for emotional distress, lost benefits, and potential punitive damages.

What to do if you suspect Age Discrimination

If you believe you have been a victim of age discrimination, it's vital to act quickly and strategically. The window for filing a charge can be limited.

  1. Start Documenting: Immediately begin keeping a detailed record of all discriminatory incidents, conversations, and treatment.
  2. Review Your Records: Secure and review all relevant employment records, including performance reviews, pay stubs, and correspondence.
  3. Seek Legal Counsel: Consult an experienced employment law attorney to evaluate your case, calculate potential damages, and guide you on the best path forward.
  4. Consider Filing a Charge: File a charge with the EEOC or your state's fair employment agency. A great first step is to learn your rights under federal law by visiting the official website for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

Conclusion

There is no single answer to what is the average age discrimination settlement. The value is highly dependent on case-specific elements like evidence quality, financial losses, and applicable laws. While general EEOC statistics offer a baseline, stronger cases handled by legal professionals can yield significantly higher results. For any individual facing ageism in the workplace, the most important steps are to document incidents meticulously and seek qualified legal guidance to properly assess the claim's full potential.

Frequently Asked Questions

Settlements are calculated based on a combination of factors, including economic damages (back pay, front pay, lost benefits), non-economic damages (emotional distress), and potential punitive damages. The strength of your evidence and jurisdiction also play major roles.

An EEOC settlement often involves mediation and may reflect a lower, median figure. A private settlement, negotiated with an attorney, can lead to a much higher payout, especially for stronger cases that threaten costly litigation. The EEOC enforces federal law, while private attorneys can also pursue claims under state laws that might offer broader damages.

Compelling evidence can include direct statements from managers about age, emails showing discriminatory bias, or performance reviews that suddenly turn negative. Circumstantial evidence, like a pattern of replacing older workers with younger ones, also strengthens a case.

Under federal law (ADEA), there are damage caps based on the size of the employer, but lost wages (back and front pay) are not capped. Many state laws, however, have no caps on compensatory or punitive damages, which can lead to higher settlements in some cases.

While possible, it is highly discouraged. Attorneys experienced in employment law can properly evaluate your case, navigate legal complexities, and effectively negotiate for a fair settlement. Individuals without legal counsel often settle for far less than their claim is worth.

The size of the company impacts the settlement in several ways. Larger companies often have more financial resources to pay higher settlements and may be more motivated to settle quickly to avoid public relations damage. Additionally, federal damage caps are tied to the number of employees.

Going to trial is riskier, slower, and more expensive. While a trial can result in a significantly higher award if you win, there is also the risk of losing and walking away with nothing. Trials are public, unlike confidential settlements.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.