Skip to content

What is the quality of life assessment measure? A Guide to Key Assessment Tools

5 min read

According to a systematic review published in 2020, the SF-36 was the most frequently used generic quality of life (QoL) assessment instrument in population-based studies. So, what is the quality of life assessment measure? These are standardized tools designed to measure an individual's overall well-being, encompassing objective factors like health and environment, as well as subjective perceptions of satisfaction.

Quick Summary

A quality of life assessment measure is a standardized instrument used to evaluate a person's perceived well-being across various domains, such as physical, psychological, and social health. These tools are essential for healthcare, research, and policy, helping to quantify subjective experiences and track the impact of treatments or conditions over time. Different measures exist, ranging from generic to condition-specific questionnaires.

Key Points

  • Definition: A QoL assessment measure quantifies an individual's perception of their life across multiple dimensions of well-being, including physical, psychological, and social aspects.

  • Objective vs. Subjective: These measures combine objective, observable data (e.g., functional capacity) with subjective, self-reported feelings (e.g., satisfaction) for a comprehensive evaluation.

  • Key Tool: WHOQOL-BREF: The World Health Organization's brief questionnaire assesses four domains (physical, psychological, social, environmental) and overall QoL, suitable for cross-cultural comparisons.

  • Key Tool: SF-36: A widely used 36-item generic health survey that measures eight scales, summarizing into physical and mental health component scores.

  • Key Tool: EuroQol EQ-5D: A concise, preference-based tool assessing five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), often used in economic evaluations.

  • Use Cases: QoL measures are crucial in clinical trials, public health policy, and personal wellness to understand the impact of health conditions and interventions from the patient's viewpoint.

  • Generic vs. Condition-Specific: Instruments are available for general use across populations (generic) and for specific diseases or conditions, offering varying levels of sensitivity.

In This Article

Defining the Quality of Life Assessment Measure

A quality of life (QoL) assessment measure is a scientifically validated tool used to quantify an individual's perception of their position in life, considering their culture, values, goals, and expectations. Unlike simple health status indicators, QoL measures capture a broader range of human experiences related to overall well-being. This shift from a purely biomedical, disease-focused model to a biopsychosocial, well-being-focused approach has made QoL measures increasingly important, especially with improved treatments leading to longer lives for individuals with chronic conditions.

Subjective vs. Objective Measures

QoL assessment measures typically incorporate both subjective and objective components. Objective measures focus on observable and recordable factors, such as disease activity or functional capacity. In contrast, subjective measures capture an individual's internal thoughts, feelings, and perceptions, such as their satisfaction with different life domains. Both are critical for a comprehensive assessment. The perceived impact and personal expectation of a situation can greatly differ from objective clinical endpoints, highlighting the importance of capturing the patient's unique perspective.

Generic vs. Condition-Specific Instruments

To effectively capture the multidimensional nature of QoL, various instruments have been developed. These can be broadly categorized into two types:

  • Generic Instruments: These measures are applicable across a wide range of health conditions and treatments, allowing for comparisons between different patient populations or interventions. They assess broad domains relevant to most people, such as general health, psychological state, and social relationships. Examples include the WHOQOL-BREF and the SF-36.
  • Condition-Specific Instruments: These are tailored for particular diseases or populations. They focus on aspects of QoL that are uniquely relevant to that condition, making them more sensitive to the impact of a specific illness or its treatment. Examples include the Beck Depression Inventory or the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory.

Prominent Quality of Life Assessment Measures

The WHOQOL-BREF

The World Health Organization's Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument was developed for cross-cultural comparisons of QoL. The brief version, the WHOQOL-BREF, is a 26-item self-report questionnaire assessing an individual's QoL over the past month. It provides scores across four main domains:

  • Physical Health: Includes items on pain, energy, mobility, sleep, and daily activities.
  • Psychological Health: Covers areas like self-esteem, body image, memory, concentration, and positive and negative feelings.
  • Social Relationships: Addresses personal relationships, social support, and sexual activity.
  • Environment: Considers financial resources, safety, home environment, health care, and transportation.

The tool also includes two items on overall QoL and general health. Raw scores are transformed to a 0–100 scale, with a higher score indicating a better QoL.

The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

As one of the most widely used generic measures, the SF-36 provides a comprehensive evaluation of health-related quality of life. It is a 36-item questionnaire covering eight health concepts or scales:

  • Physical Functioning (PF)
  • Role Physical (RP)
  • Bodily Pain (BP)
  • General Health (GH)
  • Vitality (VT)
  • Social Functioning (SF)
  • Role Emotional (RE)
  • Mental Health (MH)

These eight scales can be summarized into two main components: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The SF-36 has been translated into numerous languages and is used extensively in clinical trials and population health studies.

The EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D)

Used for both clinical and economic appraisal, the EQ-5D is a concise, generic patient-reported outcome measure. It is often used to calculate Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in cost-effectiveness studies. The descriptive system consists of five dimensions:

  • Mobility
  • Self-care
  • Usual Activities
  • Pain/Discomfort
  • Anxiety/Depression

Each dimension is assessed on a scale (the 3-level or 5-level version) to describe the patient's health state. The EQ-5D also includes a visual analogue scale (VAS) for an overall health rating.

Comparison of Common QoL Measures

Feature WHOQOL-BREF SF-36 EuroQol EQ-5D
Type Generic, Cross-cultural Generic, Health-related Generic, Preference-based
Domains Physical Health, Psychological Health, Social Relationships, Environment 8 scales: PF, RP, BP, GH, VT, SF, RE, MH 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression
Question Count 26 items 36 items 5 descriptive questions + Visual Analogue Scale
Primary Use Cross-cultural comparisons, broad well-being assessment Population surveys, clinical trials, health policy Clinical and economic appraisal (e.g., QALYs)
Output Domain scores (0-100 scale) 8 scales, Physical and Mental Component Summaries (PCS/MCS) Profile score, Index score (utility value), VAS score
Pros Developed with diverse cultural input, comprehensive domains Long-established, extensive validation, captures mental and physical components well Very brief, yields a single utility value for cost-effectiveness analysis
Cons Broader scope may not be sensitive to specific diseases Not designed for a single total score, scoring requires proprietary software Limited number of dimensions may miss nuances, utility values can be controversial

The Role of QoL Assessment Measures in Different Fields

The application of QoL measures extends beyond healthcare to provide valuable insights in various contexts:

  • Clinical Practice and Research: QoL measures help assess the impact of treatments from the patient's perspective, providing crucial information alongside traditional clinical endpoints. They help in monitoring treatment effectiveness, especially for chronic diseases where cure is not possible.
  • Public Health and Policy: In population health surveys, QoL measures help describe the health and social status of populations and inform policies regarding resource allocation. They can highlight how environmental factors or socio-economic status influence overall well-being.
  • Personal Development and Wellness: Individuals can use self-administered QoL assessments to evaluate their own well-being across different life domains. This can guide personal goal-setting and help monitor progress toward a more fulfilling and balanced life.
  • Economic Evaluation: Measures like the EQ-5D are used by health economists to compare the cost-effectiveness of different healthcare interventions by calculating Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs).

Conclusion

What is the quality of life assessment measure? A quality of life assessment measure is a multidimensional tool that captures an individual's subjective perception of their well-being across various physical, psychological, and social domains. These measures, ranging from comprehensive generic instruments like the WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 to concise preference-based tools like the EQ-5D, provide invaluable data for healthcare professionals, researchers, and individuals alike. They represent a fundamental shift towards acknowledging the patient's perspective as central to evaluating health outcomes. As our understanding of well-being evolves, the development and application of QoL assessment measures will continue to play a vital role in improving health outcomes, informing policy, and promoting a holistic approach to life satisfaction.

Additional Resources

For more detailed information on QoL measures and their applications in a public health context, consult the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) book chapter on Assessing Quality of Life.

Frequently Asked Questions

QoL (Quality of Life) is a broad term for a person's overall well-being. HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life) is a more specific concept that focuses on how a disease, disability, or treatment affects a person's quality of life, specifically in terms of physical and mental health.

In healthcare, QoL assessments are used to evaluate treatment outcomes from the patient's perspective, monitor the impact of chronic conditions, and inform clinical decisions. They help healthcare providers understand the broader impact of a patient's health status.

The patient is generally the primary source of information for QoL assessments, as their subjective perception is central to the concept. In cases where a patient cannot respond, proxy assessments may be completed by a clinician or relative.

Limitations include the inherent subjectivity and the challenge of defining QoL universally. Some measures may not capture all aspects important to a specific individual or condition, and the choice of measure can influence study results.

The EQ-5D is scored in three ways: as a five-number profile describing the patient's health state across the dimensions, as an index score (utility value) based on population preferences, and as a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) rating of overall health.

While generic measures like the WHOQOL-BREF are designed for cross-cultural use, they may not be appropriate for all populations, such as young children. The choice of instrument should be guided by the target population and study purpose.

QoL is multidimensional because it encompasses a wide range of factors beyond physical health, including psychological state, social interactions, personal beliefs, and the surrounding environment. A holistic assessment requires capturing these varied aspects.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.