What is the range of the Edmonson fall risk score?
The Edmonson Psychiatric Fall Risk Assessment Tool (EPFRAT) includes weighted factors that can result in a score extending into negative numbers for individuals with lower fall risk. The maximum score can exceed 100. A score of 90 or greater is often used to identify patients at high risk for falls. The potential range depends on the combination of risk factors assessed.
How the Edmonson score is calculated
The EPFRAT is designed for the psychiatric population, taking into account factors like agitation and psychosis, which are not typically found in general fall risk assessments. The score is determined by summing points from nine distinct categories.
A detailed breakdown of these categories and their assigned points is available in the {Link: Academia.edu https://www.academia.edu/32629769/Edmonson_Psychiatric_Fall_Risk_Assessment_Edmonson_Psychiatric_Fall_Risk_Assessment} resource. The possibility of scoring negative points for mental status is what allows for negative total scores.
Interpreting the Edmonson score
The EPFRAT score is interpreted based on a high-risk threshold. Reaching or exceeding this threshold should prompt specific fall prevention interventions.
Risk Stratification Based on Score
| Score Range | Risk Level | Nursing Action |
|---|---|---|
| Less than 90 | Lower to Moderate Risk | Implement standard fall precautions. Continue routine monitoring. |
| 90 or Greater | High Risk | Initiate targeted, enhanced fall prevention protocols and interventions. Increase monitoring frequency. |
This straightforward approach helps clinicians quickly identify high-risk patients and implement appropriate safety measures like increased supervision or mobility support. The tool's design makes it particularly suitable for the psychiatric inpatient population, addressing their unique fall risk factors.
Comparison with other fall risk scales
The Edmonson scale offers advantages over general fall risk tools like the Morse Fall Scale, especially in psychiatric settings.
| Feature | Edmonson Psychiatric Fall Risk Assessment Tool (EPFRAT) | Morse Fall Scale (MFS) |
|---|---|---|
| Target Population | Inpatient psychiatric patients | General patient population (e.g., medical, surgical) |
| Scoring Range | Potentially negative to over 100. | 0–125. |
| Risk Factor Inclusion | Includes psychiatric-specific factors (e.g., diagnoses, agitation, sleep disturbance). | Focuses on general medical factors (e.g., IV lock, gait, secondary diagnosis). |
| High-Risk Threshold | Typically 90 or greater. | 46 or greater. |
| Negative Scoring | Yes. | No. |
The EPFRAT's specialized focus on psychiatric risks, such as impaired judgment and medication side effects, makes it more sensitive for this population. While the Morse scale is effective for general patients, it may not adequately capture the specific risks in psychiatric units.
Conclusion
The Edmonson fall risk score features a range that can extend into negative values for lower risk and has a typical high-risk threshold of 90 or greater. This tool is specifically tailored for psychiatric inpatients, incorporating risk factors unique to this population. By using the EPFRAT, healthcare providers can better identify and implement targeted fall prevention strategies, enhancing patient safety in psychiatric settings. The tool's continued use and refinement through research contribute to effective fall prevention.
For more information on the development and validation of the Edmonson Psychiatric Fall Risk Assessment Tool, you can reference its original publication {Link: journals.healio.com https://journals.healio.com/doi/pdf/10.3928/02793695-20101202-03}.