Skip to content

What scale is used to determine if a patient is a high fall risk?

4 min read

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), one in four adults aged 65 or older experiences a fall each year, emphasizing the need for robust fall prevention strategies. One such strategy is using a standardized clinical tool to determine if a patient is a high fall risk, which helps healthcare professionals implement targeted interventions to protect patient safety.

Quick Summary

Healthcare professionals primarily use the Morse Fall Scale (MFS) to quickly and reliably determine if a patient is a high fall risk by evaluating six key risk factors, assigning points for each, and calculating a total score.

Key Points

  • Morse Fall Scale (MFS): This is a widely used clinical tool for assessing fall risk in acute care settings, evaluating six key factors to generate a total score.

  • MFS Scoring: A high fall risk is indicated by a score above 45 on the Morse Fall Scale, requiring increased precautions.

  • Multifactorial Assessment: Effective fall prevention involves using assessment tools like the MFS alongside clinical judgment and other tests like the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.

  • Personalized Interventions: Fall risk assessment scores guide the development of tailored prevention plans that may include medication review, physical therapy, and environmental modifications.

  • Regular Reassessment: Fall risk should be re-evaluated regularly, especially after a fall or significant change in a patient's condition, to ensure interventions remain appropriate.

In This Article

The Gold Standard: Morse Fall Scale (MFS)

The Morse Fall Scale (MFS) is one of the most widely used and validated tools for assessing fall risk, especially in acute care settings like hospitals and rehabilitation facilities. Developed by Janice Morse, the scale is quick, easy to administer, and provides a clear, quantitative measure of a patient’s fall risk based on specific criteria. The scale's simplicity and high inter-rater reliability make it a cornerstone of many hospital fall prevention programs.

The Six Key Components of the MFS

To determine a patient's risk level, the MFS examines six variables, with points assigned for each:

  1. History of falling: The most significant predictor of future falls is a history of recent falls. A score of 25 points is given if the patient has fallen within the last three months.
  2. Secondary diagnosis: The presence of more than one active medical condition can increase fall risk. Patients with a secondary diagnosis receive 15 points.
  3. Ambulatory aid: The type of assistance a patient uses for mobility is a key indicator of their stability. Points are allocated based on whether they need no aid (0 points), a cane or walker (15 points), or rely on furniture for support (30 points).
  4. IV therapy or heparin lock: An intravenous line can impede mobility and increase the risk of tripping or entanglement. Patients with an IV receive 20 points.
  5. Gait: How a patient walks directly reflects their balance and stability. A normal gait earns 0 points, a weak gait (e.g., shuffling, stooping) earns 10 points, and an impaired gait (difficulty rising, unsteady) earns 20 points.
  6. Mental status: This assesses the patient's awareness of their physical limitations. A patient who is oriented to their abilities scores 0, while one who overestimates their capabilities or is forgetful scores 15.

Scoring and Risk Interpretation

Once the six items have been assessed, the points are tallied to determine a total score, which corresponds to a specific risk level:

  • Low Risk (0-24 points): While low risk, interventions for all patients are still put in place.
  • Moderate Risk (25-45 points): Patients in this range require standard fall prevention measures and increased attention.
  • High Risk (45+ points): These patients are significantly more likely to fall and require the most stringent and comprehensive interventions.

Other Important Fall Risk Assessment Tools

While the MFS is widely used, other scales and tests are also common, each with different focuses and applications. The ideal tool depends on the patient population and clinical setting.

Comparison of Common Fall Risk Scales

Assessment Tool Primary Focus Key Features Target Population
Morse Fall Scale (MFS) Predicting fall risk based on objective criteria Quick and simple with six items; widely used in hospitals Acute care patients
Hendrich II Fall Risk Model (HIIFRM) Identifying specific intrinsic risk factors Screens for eight risk factors, including medications and depression Adults in various acute care settings
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Measuring mobility, balance, and gait speed Times a patient rising from a chair, walking 10 feet, turning, and returning Community-dwelling older adults, general screening
Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (JHFRAT) Comprehensive, multi-factorial assessment Considers age, fall history, specific medications, and mobility status Hospitalized adults, particularly in acute care

Hendrich II Fall Risk Model (HIIFRM)

The HIIFRM is another evidence-based tool that screens for eight specific fall risk factors, plus a "Get Up and Go" test. Its emphasis on specific, modifiable risk factors like confusion, symptomatic depression, and medication use allows for more targeted interventions compared to the MFS's broader approach. The HIIFRM assigns a high-risk status to patients scoring 5 or higher.

Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test

The TUG test is a simple, five-minute performance-based assessment, often used in non-acute settings, to evaluate balance, gait speed, and mobility. The patient is timed as they rise from a chair, walk 10 feet, turn around, walk back, and sit down again. A time of 10 seconds or less is considered normal for a healthy adult over 60, with longer times indicating a higher fall risk.

Creating Personalized Fall Prevention Plans

After a fall risk assessment tool, such as the MFS, identifies a high-risk patient, the crucial next step is to implement a personalized fall prevention plan. A high score on any scale is not a diagnosis but a guide for intervention. Proactive strategies can include:

  • Environmental Modifications: Removing clutter, improving lighting, and installing grab bars in bathrooms.
  • Medication Management: Reviewing and adjusting medications that may cause dizziness, drowsiness, or imbalance with a healthcare provider.
  • Physical Therapy: Tailored exercise programs to improve strength, balance, and gait.
  • Assistive Devices: Ensuring proper use of canes, walkers, or wheelchairs, and reassessing their need periodically.
  • Patient and Family Education: Informing the patient and their loved ones about specific risk factors and preventive actions.

Conclusion: The Importance of Comprehensive Assessment

Ultimately, no single tool can perfectly predict every fall. Healthcare professionals must use fall risk assessment scales, like the MFS, as part of a comprehensive, multifactorial approach to patient safety. By combining a reliable scoring system with clinical judgment and personalized interventions, healthcare teams can significantly reduce the incidence of falls and their associated injuries. Regular reassessment, especially after a change in a patient's condition or following a fall, is also vital to maintaining an effective prevention plan. Proactive and continuous assessment is key to empowering older adults to maintain their independence and safety, reducing anxiety for both patients and their families. To learn more about fall prevention, visit the National Institutes of Health website at https://www.nih.gov/health-information/nih-senior-health/fall-prevention.

Frequently Asked Questions

A high score, typically defined as over 45 points, indicates that a patient has a significantly increased risk of falling. This triggers healthcare providers to implement more intensive, high-risk fall prevention interventions.

A patient's fall risk should be assessed upon admission and regularly throughout their stay, particularly after a change in health status, transfer to a new unit, or following a fall event.

The six components are: history of falling, presence of a secondary diagnosis, use of an ambulatory aid, intravenous (IV) therapy, gait, and mental status.

No. A low score (0-24 points) simply means the patient is at a minimal risk based on the scale's criteria. Standard precautions are still necessary for all patients, as no risk can be completely eliminated.

Other scales include the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model, the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (JHFRAT), and performance-based tests like the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.

For high-risk patients, interventions may include frequent staff rounding, placing the patient closer to the nursing station, providing a fall risk wristband, and implementing a personalized prevention plan developed by a multidisciplinary team.

The Morse Fall Scale was developed primarily for acute care settings. While its principles are relevant, other tools like the Timed Up and Go (TUG) or the Falls Risk for Older Persons-Community Setting Screening Tool (FROP-Com Screen) are often better suited for community-dwelling seniors.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.