Skip to content

Which fall risk assessment tool would the nurse employ for a patient using a walker?

4 min read

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), one in four adults over 65 experiences a fall each year. When considering which fall risk assessment tool would the nurse employ for a patient using a walker, the Morse Fall Scale is a primary consideration, as it explicitly evaluates the use of assistive devices. The ultimate choice, however, depends on the patient's full clinical picture and the specific care setting.

Quick Summary

Several validated tools are available to assess fall risk in patients who use assistive devices like walkers. The Morse Fall Scale and the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model are common scoring tools used in clinical settings. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test is a quick, functional mobility assessment. Effective assessment requires considering a patient's medical history, physical limitations, gait, and environment to inform tailored interventions.

Key Points

  • Morse Fall Scale is a primary tool for walker users: The Morse Fall Scale explicitly includes the use of an ambulatory aid like a walker as one of its scoring criteria, making it highly relevant.

  • Hendrich II Fall Risk Model also applies: This model evaluates risk factors like medication use and includes a "Get-Up-and-Go" test that can be performed with a walker, focusing on underlying causes of instability.

  • Functional mobility testing is key: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test is a simple, direct functional assessment that can be performed with the patient's walker to objectively measure mobility and balance.

  • No single tool is perfect: A multi-faceted approach combining multiple assessment tools and clinical judgment is recommended, as no single tool can predict all fall risks.

  • Assessment must lead to tailored interventions: Identifying risk is the first step; effective fall prevention for walker users requires tailored strategies, including environmental adjustments, proper device training, and therapy.

  • Regular reassessment is crucial: Patient conditions can change, so ongoing monitoring and reassessment are necessary to adjust interventions and ensure continued patient safety.

In This Article

Comprehensive Fall Risk Assessment for Walker Users

For a nurse, selecting the right fall risk assessment tool for a patient who uses a walker is a critical step in a comprehensive fall prevention strategy. While several tools exist, some are more applicable than others for this specific patient population. The Morse Fall Scale (MFS) is a widely recognized and utilized option because it directly incorporates the use of ambulatory aids, such as walkers, into its scoring system. Another valuable tool is the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model, which takes a different approach by focusing on key indicators, including a "Get-Up-and-Go" test.

The Morse Fall Scale (MFS): Explicitly Accounting for Walkers

The Morse Fall Scale is a well-established and easy-to-use tool that assesses a patient's risk across six key variables. For patients using a walker, the 'Ambulatory Aid' variable is particularly relevant. The MFS is straightforward to administer and helps nurses quickly categorize a patient's risk level as low, moderate, or high based on a cumulative score. This immediate feedback helps in implementing timely interventions.

  • Variable 1: History of falling. A history of falling in the current or previous hospital stay adds 25 points.
  • Variable 2: Secondary diagnosis. Having more than one medical diagnosis can increase the fall risk, adding 15 points.
  • Variable 3: Ambulatory aid. The use of a walker or cane scores 15 points.
  • Variable 4: IV therapy/heparin lock. The presence of an IV or saline lock adds 20 points, as it can impede movement.
  • Variable 5: Gait. An impaired gait, characterized by shuffling or poor balance, scores 20 points, while a weak gait scores 10.
  • Variable 6: Mental status. Forgetting limitations or overestimating abilities scores 15 points.

The Hendrich II Fall Risk Model: Focusing on Core Risk Factors

The Hendrich II Fall Risk Model (HIIFRM) is another evidence-based tool, but it evaluates risk based on eight distinct factors, which are often integrated into electronic health records. This model focuses less on the specific assistive device and more on underlying physical and cognitive root causes. The most direct assessment related to mobility is the "Get-Up-and-Go Test".

  • Risk factors evaluated: This includes confusion/disorientation, symptomatic depression, altered elimination, dizziness, gender, and specific medication categories (antiepileptics and benzodiazepines).
  • Get-Up-and-Go Test: This functional assessment evaluates a patient's ability to rise from a seated position. A poor performance indicates increased fall risk.

The Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test: A Functional Mobility Assessment

In addition to scoring tools, a nurse may employ the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test to assess a patient's functional mobility directly. This test is performed with the patient's usual assistive device, such as a walker. The nurse times the patient as they rise from a chair, walk 10 feet, turn around, walk back, and sit down. A time of 12 seconds or more suggests a high fall risk. The TUG test offers a practical, real-world measure of a patient's balance and gait, complementing a scoring tool like the MFS.

Comparison of Fall Risk Assessment Tools

Feature Morse Fall Scale (MFS) Hendrich II Fall Risk Model Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test
Focus Six key variables, including specific ambulatory aids. Eight root-cause risk factors, including medications and the "Get-Up-and-Go" test. Functional mobility and balance assessment.
Scoring A numerical score categorizing risk as low, moderate, or high. A cumulative score where ≥ 5 indicates high risk. Time-based score; ≥ 12 seconds suggests high risk.
Administration Quick and easy to complete based on patient history and observation. Quick administration, often integrated into EHR systems. Requires a stopwatch and a clear 10-foot path.
Relevance for Walker Users Specifically scores the use of a walker. Evaluates mobility via the "Get-Up-and-Go" test, which can be performed with a walker. Direct functional assessment performed with the walker.
Best Used For General and quick screening in acute or long-term care settings. Inpatient hospital settings, often with EHR integration. Targeted mobility assessment and measuring changes over time.

Choosing the Right Tool and Implementing Interventions

The decision on which tool to use depends on the clinical setting and the patient's specific needs. In a busy hospital setting, the Morse Fall Scale is often used for its speed and direct consideration of assistive devices. For geriatric or rehabilitation patients, a more comprehensive assessment using the Hendrich II model or the TUG test might provide deeper insights into the underlying causes of impaired mobility.

Regardless of the tool, the assessment is merely the first step. The results must guide the nurse in implementing tailored, evidence-based interventions. For a patient using a walker, this could include:

  • Environmental modifications: Ensuring clear pathways, removing clutter, improving lighting, and placing the call bell within easy reach.
  • Proper assistive device use: Ensuring the walker is the correct height and that the patient has received proper training on its use.
  • Targeted therapy: Collaborating with physical therapy for gait training, strengthening exercises, and balance improvement.
  • Medication review: Consulting with the care team to review medications, such as benzodiazepines or antiepileptics, that may increase fall risk.
  • Patient and family education: Informing both the patient and family members about the identified fall risks and the precautions being taken.

Conclusion

Ultimately, no single tool can perfectly predict every fall, and clinical judgment remains essential. The Morse Fall Scale is a highly suitable choice for a patient using a walker due to its explicit evaluation of assistive aids. However, a holistic approach that includes functional mobility tests like the TUG, consideration of the Hendrich II model's risk factors, and ongoing clinical reassessment is the most effective strategy for ensuring patient safety. Regular reassessment, especially after a fall or a change in the patient's condition, is crucial to adjust interventions and provide responsive, patient-centered care. By combining validated tools with targeted interventions, nurses can significantly reduce the risk of falls for patients who rely on walkers for mobility.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Morse Fall Scale is a highly suitable tool for a patient using a walker, as it explicitly includes the use of an ambulatory aid in its scoring. However, the best approach often involves a combination of a scoring tool and functional mobility assessments like the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test.

The Morse Fall Scale has a category for 'Ambulatory Aid'. For a patient using a walker, the nurse would assign 15 points in this category. This score is then combined with points from other categories, such as history of falls, secondary diagnoses, and gait, to determine the total fall risk.

While the Hendrich II model doesn't explicitly score the use of a walker, it evaluates mobility through the 'Get-Up-and-Go' test. This test is performed with the patient's usual device, and a difficult or failed attempt to rise from a chair indicates a higher fall risk.

The Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test is a functional assessment that measures the time it takes a patient to stand up, walk 10 feet, turn around, and sit back down. A patient using a walker would perform this test with their walker, and a longer completion time (≥ 12 seconds) indicates a higher fall risk.

No, not all fall risk tools explicitly consider the use of assistive devices in the same way. The Morse Fall Scale directly scores it, whereas other tools like the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model assess mobility more broadly, which may or may not include the impact of a walker.

After assessing the patient's risk, a nurse should ensure the walker is appropriately sized and that the patient has received proper training. Interventions can also include removing environmental hazards, providing non-slip footwear, and consulting with physical therapy for gait training and strengthening.

Fall risk should be reassessed regularly, typically on admission, upon transfer to a new unit, after a fall, and with any significant change in the patient's condition or medication. Continued monitoring ensures the intervention plan remains effective.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.