Skip to content

Who can decide that an older adult no longer can retain a license to drive?

5 min read

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, older adult drivers are more likely to be injured or killed in car accidents per mile driven than many other age groups. This crucial fact highlights why it is so important to address the question of who can decide that an older adult no longer can retain a license to drive, ensuring the safety of all road users.

Quick Summary

Ultimately, the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) holds the final authority to revoke a driver's license. However, the process is often initiated by a report from a concerned family member, a medical professional, or law enforcement, triggering a formal reassessment of the individual's driving abilities.

Key Points

  • The DMV is the final authority: The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) holds the ultimate legal power to revoke a driver's license after reviewing evidence and conducting assessments.

  • Reporting can be done by anyone: Concerns about an older adult's driving can be reported to the DMV by family members, concerned citizens, medical professionals, or law enforcement.

  • Medical professionals play a key role: Doctors can assess a patient's health and its impact on driving, and may be legally required to report certain conditions in some states.

  • The process involves reassessment: A report of unsafe driving can trigger a mandatory reassessment by the DMV, which may include vision, written, and road tests.

  • Proactive conversations are vital: Family members should address concerns early and with empathy, documenting specific incidents rather than making broad claims.

  • Alternatives to driving exist: Helping an older adult explore alternative transportation options can ease the transition and maintain their independence.

In This Article

The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)

The Department of Motor Vehicles (or its state equivalent) is the ultimate authority with the power to suspend or revoke a person's driver's license. A decision to revoke a license is not made arbitrarily but is the culmination of a formal, state-regulated process that typically begins with a report from an outside party. The DMV acts as a regulatory body, evaluating evidence and conducting its own assessments to determine if a driver, regardless of age, can operate a vehicle safely. It is important to remember that this process is based on functional ability rather than age alone.

The reporting process

Concerned individuals do not have the power to unilaterally strip someone of their license, but they can trigger an investigation by the DMV. The process for reporting an unsafe driver varies by state, but generally follows these steps:

  1. Submission of a report: A citizen, doctor, or police officer can submit a report or form to the DMV detailing concerns about a driver's abilities. This report should include specific, observable instances of unsafe driving behavior. Reporting can often be done anonymously, though specific state laws may vary.
  2. DMV review and investigation: The DMV reviews the submitted report to determine if further action is warranted. If the concerns are credible, the DMV will begin an investigation, which may involve contacting the driver directly.
  3. Driver reassessment: The DMV may require the driver to undergo a reassessment, which often includes a vision test, a written knowledge test, and a road skills test. Some states may also require a medical evaluation. This is not a punishment but a standard procedure to verify the driver’s fitness.
  4. Licensing decision: Based on the reassessment results, the DMV makes a licensing decision. This can range from renewing the license without changes to imposing restrictions (like no nighttime driving or no freeway driving) or, in the most severe cases, revoking the license entirely.

The role of family members and concerned citizens

Family members are often the first to notice a decline in a loved one's driving abilities, but their role is to report concerns, not to make a final decision. Approaching this conversation can be extremely difficult, as driving is often tied to independence and identity. It is crucial to frame the discussion around safety and well-being rather than punishment or control.

  • Observing behavior: Documenting specific, factual instances of unsafe driving is more effective than making broad accusations. Look for signs like unexplained dents or scrapes on the car, getting lost on familiar routes, or having close calls.
  • Initiating a conversation: Approaching the topic calmly and respectfully is key. It can be helpful to involve other trusted family members to show a united front. Resources from organizations like the AARP and the National Institute on Aging offer guidance on how to have these conversations.
  • Reporting to the DMV: If conversations do not lead to a voluntary driving cessation, a family member can make a formal report to the state's DMV. This is a last resort but is often necessary for the safety of the driver and the public.

Medical professionals and their responsibilities

Physicians play a significant role in assessing a person's medical fitness to drive. They are uniquely positioned to connect observed health changes to potential driving risks. However, their ability to report to the DMV varies significantly by state law and is governed by patient privacy rules.

  • Assessment: Doctors can assess a patient's vision, cognitive function, and physical abilities that are essential for safe driving. They may use various office-based tests and observations to identify impairments caused by conditions such as dementia, stroke, diabetes, or arthritis.
  • Counseling: A doctor's professional opinion can be a powerful motivator for an older adult to consider stopping or limiting their driving. They can also recommend driving rehabilitation specialists for a more comprehensive evaluation.
  • Mandatory vs. voluntary reporting: Some states have mandatory reporting laws for specific medical conditions, requiring doctors to report a patient to the DMV. In other states, reporting is voluntary, but doctors are often protected from liability if they report in good faith. The decision to report must be handled with sensitivity and consideration for patient-doctor confidentiality.

Law enforcement and mandatory reporting

Police officers are another critical part of the system. If an officer observes an unsafe driver during a traffic stop or at the scene of an accident, they can report their observations to the DMV. These reports carry significant weight in the reassessment process because they are based on direct, professional observation of the driver's performance on the road.

Comparison of reporting parties and their authority

Feature Family Member/Citizen Medical Professional Law Enforcement Officer
Authority Initiates report, has no final say on license status. Can initiate report based on medical findings, but doesn't have authority to revoke. Initiates report based on observed driving behavior, but doesn't have authority to revoke.
Reporting Basis Observable unsafe driving behaviors or incidents. Clinical assessment of medical conditions affecting driving ability. Direct observation of unsafe driving during traffic stops or accidents.
Mandatory Reporting Never mandated, always voluntary. Mandatory in some states for specific conditions (e.g., severe dementia); voluntary in others. Generally required to report observed unsafe driving.
Privacy Issues No patient privacy issues, but may face family conflict. Must balance patient confidentiality with public safety; state laws dictate rules. Information collected is part of official police record, subject to data privacy.
Initiates what? DMV investigation and potential reassessment. DMV investigation and potential reassessment. DMV investigation and potential reassessment.

The process from start to finish

When a report is filed with the DMV, the process unfolds methodically to ensure a fair assessment. Once the report is deemed credible, the driver is notified and may be required to take a series of tests. This can be a stressful time, and drivers and families should be prepared for what it entails.

  • Vision test: Standard eye exams are required to ensure the driver meets the minimum visual acuity standards.
  • Written knowledge test: This test confirms the driver still understands current traffic laws and road signs.
  • Road skills test: An on-road evaluation is often required to directly assess the driver's ability to navigate traffic, demonstrate safe driving behaviors, and react appropriately to different road conditions.
  • Hearing and other tests: In some cases, hearing or other functional ability tests may be necessary.

If the driver fails any part of the reassessment, the DMV may impose restrictions or revoke the license. An appeal process is typically available for those who wish to contest the decision.

Conclusion: Navigating a difficult transition

For many seniors, giving up the car keys is a challenging and emotional event, signifying a loss of independence. However, the decision is ultimately about safety—for the driver and for everyone else on the road. While family members, medical professionals, and law enforcement can all initiate the process, the final authority rests with the Department of Motor Vehicles. Encouraging honest conversations, seeking professional driving evaluations, and exploring alternative transportation options can help make this difficult transition smoother for everyone involved. Addressing this issue proactively, rather than waiting for an accident to occur, is the safest and most compassionate approach. More resources can be found on this topic from the American Medical Association's (AMA) guide to assessing older drivers: AMA's Physician's Guide to Assessing and Counseling Older Drivers.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, a family member cannot legally take away a senior's driver's license. They can, however, file a report of concern with the state's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), which may initiate a formal reassessment process.

A report should include specific, factual details about observable unsafe driving behaviors. Examples include getting lost on familiar routes, frequent close calls, unexplained dents on the vehicle, or poor judgment in traffic.

Yes, depending on state law. Some states have mandatory reporting requirements for certain medical conditions that can affect driving (like dementia), while others allow for voluntary reporting. Doctors must balance patient confidentiality with public safety.

The DMV will review the report and may require the driver to undergo a reassessment. This can include a vision test, a written test, and an on-road driving evaluation. The outcome of the reassessment determines if the license is renewed, restricted, or revoked.

If a senior refuses to stop driving voluntarily, filing a report with the DMV is often the necessary next step to ensure their safety and the safety of others. While difficult, this protects against potential harm.

Depending on the assessment results, the DMV can impose restrictions. Common examples include no driving at night, avoiding freeway driving, or requiring an extra mirror for visibility. These measures are intended to maintain independence while ensuring safety.

Alternatives include public transportation with senior fares, volunteer driver programs, ride-sharing services (Uber, Lyft), and non-emergency medical transport (NEMT) services. Exploring these options can help a senior maintain mobility and independence.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.