Skip to content

Why shouldn't the retirement age be increased? A deep dive into the hidden costs

3 min read

Research indicates that life expectancy gains are not equally distributed across socioeconomic levels, creating significant equity concerns. Increasing the retirement age is a policy that disproportionately harms vulnerable populations, impacting their health and financial security.

Quick Summary

Increasing the retirement age is opposed by many due to concerns over health impacts on older workers, particularly those in physically demanding jobs, and exacerbating economic inequalities by disproportionately cutting lifetime Social Security benefits for low-income earners and certain minority groups.

Key Points

  • Exacerbated Inequality: The widening life expectancy gap between high- and low-income earners means a higher retirement age would disproportionately penalize low-wage workers and certain minority groups, who tend to have shorter lifespans.

  • Negative Health Outcomes: Extended working life can negatively impact physical and mental health, especially for those in physically demanding jobs, leading to increased diagnoses of mental health and musculoskeletal issues.

  • Effective Benefit Cuts: Raising the retirement age reduces lifetime Social Security benefits for all new retirees, with a potential 20% cut for those who might be forced to delay claiming.

  • Increased Old-Age Poverty Risk: The reduction in benefits could push more seniors into poverty, particularly those who rely heavily on Social Security and have limited other retirement savings.

  • Ignoring Labor Market Realities: This policy overlooks the issue of ageism and the health problems that force many older workers to retire early, penalizing them instead of addressing underlying employment barriers.

  • Worsening Mental Health: Studies suggest that later retirement can increase the risk of depression, particularly for women and blue-collar workers, contradicting the idea that longer work is always beneficial.

In This Article

The Inequitable Impact on Health and Longevity

One of the most significant arguments against increasing the retirement age centers on health. While average life expectancy has risen, these gains are not shared equally across all income levels or professions, creating a widening gap. Forcing all workers to work longer ignores this fundamental inequality.

Physically Demanding Jobs Take a Heavier Toll

Workers in manual labor or physically demanding professions are particularly disadvantaged. These jobs can cause chronic health problems, making working into one's late 60s or 70s physically challenging or impossible. An increased retirement age can force these individuals to claim reduced benefits earlier, effectively a benefit cut.

The Mental Health Implications

Research suggests retirement can have a protective effect on mental health. Forcing a later retirement can delay this transition, potentially increasing mental strain on older workers, with studies indicating a higher risk of depression with later retirement ages. This effect may be particularly pronounced for women and blue-collar workers.

The Financial Consequences: A Hidden Benefit Cut

Raising the retirement age functions as a benefit cut for future retirees. Claiming benefits at the earliest age results in a larger permanent reduction. Claiming at the new, later full retirement age requires working more years for the same monthly amount. For many, this leads to reduced lifetime benefits, with one estimate suggesting nearly a 20% cut for new retirees if the age is raised to 70.

Risk of Increased Old-Age Poverty

This reduction increases the risk of old-age poverty, especially for those reliant on Social Security. Social Security is crucial in lifting millions of older Americans out of poverty. A decrease in benefits poses a financial strain for those with limited savings or pensions, a situation more common among lower-income and minority workers.

The Problem of Ageism and Labor Market Barriers

Ageism in the workplace is a reality, making it difficult for many older workers to find or keep jobs. A higher retirement age would put more older workers into this challenging market, potentially leading to extended periods of unemployment and lack of benefits.

The Comparison: Higher vs. Current Retirement Age

Feature Higher Retirement Age Current Retirement Age
Effect on Benefits Reduces lifetime benefits for most Provides a more predictable benefit structure
Health Burden Increased strain on older workers Aligns better with declining physical capacity
Socioeconomic Equity Exacerbates existing longevity and wealth gaps Lessens disparity by providing benefits sooner
Manual Labor Workers Disproportionately penalizes due to health Accommodates the physical limitations of demanding jobs
Ageism in Workplace Increases period where older workers face discrimination Allows for earlier exit from potentially ageist environments

Conclusion: A Policy with Consequences

Raising the retirement age has significant negative consequences, particularly for vulnerable populations, impacting health and financial security. It's not a neutral adjustment but a policy with disproportionate effects. A nuanced approach is needed to ensure retirement security for all. {Link: NWLC.org https://nwlc.org/raising-the-retirement-age-would-cut-benefits-for-everyone-especially-our-most-vulnerable/}

For additional context on Social Security and its role in protecting older adults from poverty, you can read more on the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities website.

Rethinking the Path Forward

Addressing retirement program solvency requires exploring alternatives that avoid unfairly burdening those with the least capacity to absorb it. Options include adjusting funding mechanisms, enhancing disability support, or introducing policies specifically protecting low-income individuals. Focusing on systemic solutions is key to a more equitable system. Raising the retirement age overlooks the complex interplay of health, wealth, and opportunity, and ultimately undermines the social contract.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, it is not. While raising the retirement age is one proposal to address solvency issues, it is considered a benefit cut and is not the only option. Alternative strategies, such as increasing the amount of earnings subject to Social Security taxes, can also help strengthen the program's long-term finances.

Workers in physically demanding jobs often experience health declines that make continued work difficult or impossible as they age. An increased retirement age forces them to retire earlier than the new standard, subjecting them to greater benefit reductions than those in less physically strenuous occupations.

Many minority groups, particularly Black and American Indian/Alaska Native workers, have lower life expectancies than white workers. This means they are less likely to live long enough to fully benefit from Social Security for as long, making the effective benefit cut of a higher retirement age even more impactful.

You would receive the same amount you would have under the old system if you claim at the new, later full retirement age. However, you would be receiving it for fewer years, effectively reducing your total lifetime benefits. If you claim at the same age you planned to originally, you would get a smaller monthly check for the rest of your life.

Yes, research indicates that forcing older workers to stay in the labor force longer can have negative health consequences, including increased risk of depression and exacerbation of musculoskeletal diseases, particularly among women and blue-collar workers.

With ageism remaining a concern in the labor market, many older workers are forced out of their jobs. An increased retirement age would leave them in a difficult position, unable to find work and forced to claim reduced Social Security benefits or rely on a potentially inadequate welfare system.

For those who rely heavily on Social Security, a higher retirement age translates directly to a reduction in total income during retirement. This is especially true for low- and middle-income retirees who have fewer personal savings to compensate for the benefit reduction.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.