Skip to content

How effective is the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in the elderly?

3 min read

According to a 2023 meta-analysis, the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) showed a pooled effectiveness of 45% against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in adults over 60, but only 18% against pneumococcal pneumonia. Understanding how effective is the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in the elderly is crucial, as its protection varies by age, health status, and the specific disease outcome.

Quick Summary

The pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) is effective at preventing invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in older adults, but less so for non-invasive pneumonia. Effectiveness can decrease with increasing age and comorbidities, and vaccine protection wanes over time. Newer conjugate vaccines (PCV) offer stronger, longer-lasting immunity against certain serotypes, which is influencing current vaccination strategies.

Key Points

  • Effective Against Invasive Disease: PPV23 shows good effectiveness (45-80%) against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), but this protection can vary and decline with age.

  • Less Effective for Pneumonia: The vaccine is significantly less effective at preventing non-invasive pneumococcal pneumonia, with effectiveness estimates often lower than for IPD.

  • Declining Protection with Age: Research shows that PPV23's effectiveness decreases with advanced age and in individuals with underlying health conditions, potentially offering no significant benefit for those aged 90 and above.

  • Waning Immunity Over Time: Unlike conjugate vaccines, the immunity conferred by PPV23 is not long-lasting and can wane significantly within 3-5 years after vaccination.

  • Newer Vaccines Offer Superior Protection: Newer pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) provide a stronger, more durable immune response against the serotypes they cover, including robust protection against pneumonia.

  • Combined Strategies are Recommended: Current recommendations, such as those from the CDC, often involve a sequential regimen of a newer PCV followed by PPV23 to provide broad protection against multiple serotypes.

In This Article

Pneumococcal disease, caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria, poses a significant health risk to the elderly population, leading to severe outcomes like pneumonia, meningitis, and bacteremia. The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) has been a cornerstone of prevention for decades, but its effectiveness in older adults is complex and depends on multiple factors.

The Strengths of PPV23 Against Invasive Disease

PPV23 has demonstrated effectiveness against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), a severe condition where bacteria enter the bloodstream or central nervous system. Reviews and analyses have shown PPV23 to be approximately 45-80% effective in preventing IPD in older adults. This protection is particularly valuable given the high mortality rates associated with IPD in this population.

The Limitations of PPV23 for Non-Invasive Pneumonia

Despite its effectiveness against IPD, PPV23's impact on preventing non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia (pneumonia not in the bloodstream) is less clear. PPV23, being a polysaccharide vaccine, doesn't create strong, long-lasting immune memory. A 2023 meta-analysis found its pooled effectiveness against pneumococcal pneumonia was only 18% among recipients.

Age, Comorbidities, and Waning Immunity

Factors like age and health significantly influence PPV23 effectiveness. Its protection is often lower in the very old and those with underlying health issues due to age-related immune decline. Studies indicate effectiveness against hospitalization for pneumonia decreases with age, showing limited benefit for individuals aged 90 and above. Protection from PPV23 has been shown to wane over time, with antibody levels declining significantly after 3–5 years in older adults.

The Rise of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines (PCVs)

Newer conjugate vaccines (PCV13, PCV15, PCV20) offer a more robust and durable immune response compared to PPV23, including better protection against pneumonia.

Comparison of Pneumococcal Vaccines in the Elderly

Feature Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine (PPV23) Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines (PCV13, PCV15, PCV20)
Protection against Serotypes Covers 23 types of bacteria. PCV13 covers 13 types, PCV20 covers 20 types.
Immune Response T-cell independent, inducing a shorter-term antibody response. T-cell dependent, generating stronger, longer-lasting immune memory.
Effectiveness (IPD) Provides good protection (45-80%) against vaccine-type invasive disease. PCV13 showed 75% efficacy against vaccine-type IPD in a major trial.
Effectiveness (Pneumonia) Less effective against non-invasive pneumonia, with inconsistent results across studies. PCV13 demonstrated significant efficacy (45%) against vaccine-type pneumococcal pneumonia in a clinical trial.
Age Dependency Effectiveness decreases significantly with increasing age, particularly for non-invasive pneumonia. PCVs tend to be more robust, though effectiveness can still be lower in immunocompromised individuals.
Duration of Immunity Antibody levels wane after 3–5 years, requiring consideration for revaccination. Studies suggest durable, long-term protection, particularly against IPD.

The Shift in Vaccination Strategy

Due to their superior effectiveness and longer-lasting protection, PCVs are increasingly central to vaccination strategies for older adults. Current recommendations often involve a PCV, sometimes followed by PPV23 for broader coverage.

Conclusion

While the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine offers valuable protection against invasive pneumococcal disease in older adults, its effectiveness against non-invasive pneumonia is limited and wanes over time and with age. The advent of more effective conjugate vaccines has led to updated recommendations often featuring PCVs. The optimal vaccination approach depends on individual factors, emphasizing the importance of consulting a healthcare provider. The CDC website provides current guidelines on pneumococcal vaccination {Link: CDC website https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/public/index.html}.

Frequently Asked Questions

PPV23 (polysaccharide vaccine) generates a shorter-term, T-cell independent antibody response, while PCV (conjugate vaccines) creates a stronger, longer-lasting T-cell dependent immune memory.

No, PPV23 only protects against the 23 specific types of pneumococcal bacteria included in the vaccine. Its effectiveness against all-cause pneumonia, or even non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia, is inconsistent and generally low in older adults.

Protection from PPV23 wanes over time, with antibody levels declining significantly after 3–5 years in older individuals. This is why newer vaccines or revaccination strategies are important.

Yes, several studies have shown that vaccine effectiveness (VE) decreases with increasing age, particularly for pneumonia outcomes. Some research suggests no significant effect is observed in individuals aged 90 or 95 years.

Most side effects are mild and short-lived, lasting 1 to 2 days. Common symptoms include pain, redness, or swelling at the injection site, fever, headache, muscle aches, and fatigue.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently recommends pneumococcal vaccination for adults aged 50 years and older. The specific vaccine type and schedule may vary based on age, health status, and prior vaccination history.

The recommendation was revised because broad childhood PCV13 vaccination resulted in significant herd immunity, lowering the incidence of those specific serotypes in the adult population. However, newer guidelines with broader PCV coverage have since replaced this approach.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.