Skip to content

Is "elderly" an ageist term? Examining the connotation and its impact

4 min read

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), ageism is a global issue, often fueled by language that perpetuates negative stereotypes about older people. This reality brings into question the neutrality of many common terms, leading many to ask: is "elderly" an ageist term? The answer lies in understanding the word's history, its connotations, and its impact on how we perceive and treat older adults.

Quick Summary

The term "elderly" is often considered ageist due to its negative and generalizing connotations, which can reinforce harmful stereotypes about frailty, dependence, and decline. Using more precise, neutral terms like "older adults," "older people," or specifying an age range is generally more respectful and inclusive. The Associated Press and many gerontological societies discourage its use, though it is sometimes permitted in headlines for space constraints. Ultimately, its use can unintentionally diminish the individuality and competence of older individuals.

Key Points

  • Term Considered Ageist: The word "elderly" is often viewed as ageist due to its negative connotations of frailty, dependency, and decline.

  • Promotes Negative Stereotypes: Its use can reinforce harmful stereotypes, ignoring the diversity and vitality found among older individuals.

  • Authoritative Organizations Oppose Use: Major groups like the United Nations, WHO, and APA recommend avoiding the term.

  • Use Respectful Alternatives: Preferred and respectful alternatives include "older adults," "older people," or specifying a precise age range.

  • Dismantles Homogenization: Avoiding "elderly" helps dismantle the problematic practice of treating older adults as a single, uniform group.

  • Positive Language Improves Care: In senior care, using positive and respectful language can boost residents' self-esteem and improve outcomes.

In This Article

The Case Against the Term "Elderly"

Despite its seemingly neutral origins, the word "elderly" has become laden with negative associations that perpetuate harmful stereotypes. It is frequently linked with concepts of decline, frailty, and dependency, failing to acknowledge the immense diversity and vitality among people in later life. Numerous authoritative organizations, including the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and the American Psychological Association, have actively discouraged the use of the term in favor of more respectful language.

The perception of "elderly" as a homogeneous group—vulnerable and dependent—is particularly damaging. This linguistic generalization can lead to "othering," where older individuals are viewed as a separate category, detached from the rest of society. This practice can reduce a person's sense of identity and agency, reinforcing ageist attitudes within society and even internalized ageism among older adults themselves.

The Negative Connotations of "Elderly"

Perception of Frailty and Decline

One of the most significant issues with the term "elderly" is its strong association with negative physical attributes. Studies have shown that when the media uses the term, it is most often framed with messages of powerlessness and decline. This framing suggests that a person's value decreases with age and reinforces the idea that aging is a state of constant physical and mental deterioration, which is not accurate. This focus on a perceived decline overshadows the many contributions and accomplishments of older individuals and fosters a sense of pity rather than respect.

Generalization and Othering

Referring to a large, diverse group of people with a single, non-specific term like "the elderly" disregards their individuality. This blanket term erases the significant variability in health, capabilities, socioeconomic status, and life experiences that exist among people over 65. This homogenization, in turn, fuels ageist assumptions and discriminatory practices. By treating older adults as a monolith, we miss the opportunity to appreciate their unique life histories and ongoing contributions to society.

Preferred Alternatives: Embracing Respectful Language

To combat ageism and promote a more inclusive society, it is essential to adopt more respectful and precise language. The shift towards alternative terminology is not about political correctness but about accuracy, respect, and dignity.

Using "Older Adults" or "Older People"

Terms like "older adults" and "older people" are widely recommended by health organizations and style guides. They are considered more neutral and accurate because they describe a chronological stage of life without attaching negative stereotypes. For instance, instead of saying "delivery man charged in fatal attack on elderly woman," a more respectful and precise headline would be "delivery man charged in fatal attack on woman, 89". This phrasing centers the individual, not their age-based classification.

Specifying an Age Range

When context requires greater specificity, it is often best to refer to a specific age range. For example, a research study might focus on "people aged 75 to 84 years" rather than simply the "elderly". This approach provides more useful and accurate information while avoiding broad generalizations. As a communication best practice, many advocates suggest asking individuals their preferred terminology when possible.

Comparison Table: Why Words Matter

Term Connotation Impact
Elderly Suggests frailty, dependence, and decline; generalizes a diverse group. Can diminish self-worth, reinforce stereotypes, and lead to ageist discrimination.
Senior Citizen Can be viewed as a formal, sometimes clichéd or condescending term. While common, can still generalize and is often associated with discounts or retirement, not full personhood.
Older Adult Neutral, descriptive, and respectful. Focuses on the person, not the stereotype. Promotes dignity and acknowledges the diversity of experiences within this age group.
Older Person Similar to "older adult," this term is neutral and widely accepted. Fosters a more positive and inclusive view of aging as a normal stage of life.

The Importance of Reframing Aging

The language we use has a profound impact on how older adults are perceived and treated. Ageist language can subtly or overtly influence public policy, healthcare practices, and everyday interactions. A movement like the Reframing Aging Initiative seeks to counter these negative narratives by promoting a more positive and inclusive perspective on aging. By consciously choosing respectful language, we can shift the narrative away from one of decline and burden towards one that recognizes the wisdom, experience, and continued contributions of older adults.

Using positive and accurate language has numerous benefits. In care settings, it fosters trust and a more supportive atmosphere, empowering residents by focusing on their abilities rather than their limitations. For society at large, it helps dismantle pervasive, damaging stereotypes and promotes healthier intergenerational relationships. As the World Health Organization's Decade of Healthy Aging (2021–2030) emphasizes, combating ageism through intentional language is a key step toward ensuring dignity and opportunity for people of all ages. The effort to replace terms like "elderly" with respectful alternatives is a small but powerful step toward this goal.

For more information on combating ageism and promoting healthy, inclusive communities, visit the National Institute on Aging's blog on avoiding ageist language. [https://www.nia.nih.gov/research/blog/2023/12/dont-call-me-old-avoiding-ageism-when-writing-about-aging]

Conclusion

To conclude, the term "elderly" is widely considered ageist because of its deep-seated, negative connotations and its tendency to generalize and dehumanize older individuals. While its usage may be declining, its legacy of stereotyping and prejudice persists. Embracing respectful and specific terminology, such as "older adults," is a vital step toward creating a more inclusive and dignified society for everyone. By being mindful of our language, we can help reframe aging in a more accurate and positive light, celebrating the rich diversity and continued value of people at every stage of life.

Frequently Asked Questions

While it is generally discouraged, some style guides permit its use in headlines where space is limited. However, in standard body text and conversational language, using more precise and neutral terms like "older adults" is strongly recommended.

The term "older adults" is preferred because it is more neutral and accurate, referring to a stage of life without attaching the negative stereotypes of frailty and decline commonly associated with "elderly". It avoids generalizing a diverse population and focuses on the person.

Yes, for many, the term "senior citizen" is also problematic. It can feel clichéd, patronizing, and still groups a wide range of individuals under a single label often associated with discounts rather than personal identity. "Older adults" is generally considered a more respectful and modern alternative.

Ageist language can lead to negative physical and mental health outcomes, such as reduced self-esteem, social isolation, and depression. It can reinforce stereotypes and diminish a person's sense of value, competence, and dignity.

The term "elder" is often considered respectful and can denote seniority, wisdom, or authority within a specific cultural context, such as within a community or tribe. In contrast, "elderly" is typically a less specific and often negatively-connotated description of someone's age.

To avoid ageist language, use person-first language (e.g., "person with dementia"), be specific about age or condition when relevant, and default to neutral terms like "older adults" or "older people". Always prioritize respect and consider how your words might be perceived.

Yes, studies show ageist language in healthcare can affect patient-provider communication, leading to misunderstandings and potentially influencing care decisions. Using respectful, precise language helps ensure that care is aligned with a patient's preferences and promotes better health outcomes.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.