Skip to content

Is the use of 4 side rails up considered a restraint?

4 min read

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), hundreds of incidents involving bed rails have been reported, highlighting significant risks associated with their use in healthcare and home settings. This crucial data brings a central question to light in senior care: is the use of 4 side rails up considered a restraint?

Quick Summary

Yes, using all four bed rails is legally considered a physical restraint if it prevents a patient from exiting the bed, thus restricting their freedom of movement. Its classification depends on patient mobility, intent of use, and whether a patient can remove the device easily.

Key Points

  • Restraint Definition: The use of all four side rails is considered a physical restraint if it restricts a patient's voluntary movement and they cannot easily remove the device.

  • CMS Regulations: Regulatory bodies like CMS and the FDA classify bed rails as restraints when used for discipline or convenience, requiring a documented medical necessity.

  • Risks Outweigh Benefits: For mobile individuals, the risks of entrapment, falls from greater heights, and psychological distress often outweigh the perceived benefits of using full bed rails.

  • Assess and Document: Proper procedure mandates an individualized patient assessment and informed consent before using bed rails for any medical symptom.

  • Alternatives Exist: Numerous safer alternatives, such as low beds, motion alarms, and assistive devices, can effectively enhance patient safety without the restrictive nature of full bed rails.

  • Medical Justification: Bed rails should only be used when medically necessary, such as for involuntary movements, and not for routine fall prevention.

In This Article

Understanding the Definition of a Restraint

In healthcare, a physical restraint is any manual method, physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident’s body that they cannot remove easily and that restricts their freedom of movement or normal access to their body. This definition is central to understanding the issue of bed rails.

The Stance of Regulatory Bodies

Regulatory organizations like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the FDA provide crucial guidelines on this matter. CMS regulations strictly prohibit the use of restraints for staff convenience or discipline. When assessing bed rail use, these agencies focus on individual patient needs rather than universal policies.

When Four Side Rails Become a Restraint

The key distinction lies in the patient's ability and intent. For a fully mobile and cognizant patient, raising all four side rails is highly likely to be classified as a restraint because it prevents them from leaving the bed at will. This restriction of movement, not for a specific medical treatment but for containment, fits the definition perfectly. The device is not easily removable by the patient and limits their access to their own body and environment.

For a patient who is physically incapable of exiting the bed, such as someone who is comatose or severely paralyzed, raising the side rails may not be considered a restraint. In such cases, the rails do not impact the patient's existing freedom of movement. However, this is a narrow exception, and thorough documentation and assessment are always required.

Risks and Dangers Associated with Bed Rails

While sometimes used for safety, bed rails carry significant risks, particularly when all four are used. The FDA has documented numerous incidents of entrapment, where individuals have become trapped between the bed rails and the mattress or between the rails themselves, leading to injury, suffocation, or death. Other risks include an increased height from which to fall for patients who attempt to climb over them, as well as the potential for abrasions, cuts, and psychological distress from feeling confined. For residents who are able to ambulate, restricting their ability to get up may reduce their overall mobility and cause agitated behavior.

Informed Consent and Assessment

Proper procedure for bed rail use involves a comprehensive, person-centered approach. This includes:

  • Individualized Assessment: A thorough evaluation of the patient's specific physical and medical needs, cognitive status, and behavioral patterns. This helps identify the root cause of issues like wandering or agitation, which often can be addressed with less restrictive interventions.
  • Informed Consent: Discussing the risks and benefits of bed rails with the patient or their representative. Any decision to use bed rails must be made voluntarily, free from coercion, and after exploring all alternatives. The consent must be clearly documented in the patient's record.
  • Least Restrictive Approach: Using bed rails only when less restrictive methods have proven ineffective in managing a documented medical symptom. This is a core principle of patient rights.

Safe and Effective Alternatives

Many alternatives can address patient safety concerns without resorting to restraints.

  • Environmental Modifications: These focus on creating a safer space for the individual.
    • Using beds that can be lowered to the floor.
    • Placing fall mats on the floor next to the bed to cushion potential falls.
    • Ensuring adequate lighting, especially at night.
  • Assistive Devices and Strategies: These aid patient mobility and address needs proactively.
    1. Using motion-sensitive alarms that alert staff when a patient attempts to get out of bed.
    2. Implementing scheduled toileting and hydration routines to meet patient needs and reduce the urge to get up independently.
    3. Providing mobility aids, such as transfer poles or grab bars, that offer support without containment.
    4. Addressing underlying medical issues that may cause pain, restlessness, or confusion.
    5. Encouraging supervised ambulation and exercise to maintain mobility and function.

Comparing Bed Rail Use: Restraint vs. Safety

Feature Considered a Restraint (e.g., Four Rails Up) Considered a Safety Device (Context-Dependent)
Patient Mobility Patient is mobile and can voluntarily exit the bed. Patient is physically unable to exit the bed (e.g., non-ambulatory, unconscious).
Intent of Use To prevent the patient from getting out of bed or wandering. To help a patient turn or reposition themselves, or to prevent inadvertent rolling out of bed (e.g., during transport or involuntary movements).
Patient's Experience Feelings of confinement, anxiety, and distress. Can increase agitation. Provides a sense of security and a hand-hold for transfers.
Documentation Requires thorough medical symptom documentation, physician's order, and informed consent. Requires documentation of specific safety need and is reassessed regularly.
Regulatory Stance Highly regulated, with strict limitations. Considered a restraint if used for convenience or discipline. Use is permitted when medically necessary and based on individualized assessment.

For more detailed guidance on regulations and person-centered approaches to bed safety, the Long Term Care Community Coalition (LTCCC) provides useful resources on their website here.

Conclusion

While a seemingly simple device, the use of all four bed rails is a complex issue with serious regulatory and safety implications. By legal and ethical standards, it is considered a restraint if it intentionally restricts a patient's voluntary movement. Healthcare facilities must prioritize patient safety by conducting comprehensive assessments, obtaining informed consent, exploring less restrictive alternatives, and using bed rails only when medically necessary, all while adhering to the strict guidelines set by bodies like CMS and the FDA. The goal of senior care should always be to promote dignity and freedom, not to limit it through convenience-based practices.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, using bed rails solely for routine fall prevention is not considered an acceptable or safe practice by regulatory bodies. It is considered a restraint and carries significant risks, including increased injury severity if a fall occurs over the rails. Alternatives like low beds and alarms are preferred.

A side rail is a restraint if it prevents a mobile person from voluntarily getting out of bed. It is considered a safety device only when used for a documented medical symptom, such as preventing an unconscious or heavily sedated patient from inadvertently rolling out of bed.

Entrapment is when a patient becomes trapped in the gaps between the rails, the mattress, or the bed frame. This can lead to serious injury, suffocation, or strangulation. It is a major safety concern, especially for frail or cognitively impaired individuals.

Partial bed rails may or may not be considered restraints, depending on the patient's condition and how they are used. For example, if a partial rail is used as an assist device for a patient to get in or out of bed, it may not be a restraint. However, if it prevents a mobile person from exiting the bed, it can still be classified as one.

Effective alternatives include using low-height beds, bedside fall mats, pressure-sensitive alarms, and providing more frequent monitoring. Environmental changes, such as ensuring clear pathways and proper lighting, also contribute to safety.

For legal use, a healthcare facility must perform an individualized assessment, explore all less restrictive options, obtain informed consent from the patient or representative, have a doctor's order specifying the medical symptom being treated, and regularly re-evaluate the need for the rails.

Yes, a patient or their family can request bed rails. However, the healthcare facility must still conduct a full risk assessment, discuss the potential dangers, explore alternatives, and document informed consent. The request does not override the facility's responsibility to prioritize the safest, least restrictive care.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.