The Shifting Landscape of Age-Inclusive Language
Language is a living thing, and the terminology we use to describe groups of people changes over time to reflect evolving societal values. Just as phrases for other demographics have been refined, the way we refer to people later in life has changed significantly. In the past, terms like "elderly" or "senior citizen" were common. However, these labels have increasingly fallen out of favor as their negative, stereotyping connotations have become more widely understood. A shift has occurred toward more respectful and neutral language that honors a person's identity beyond their age.
Why Terminology Has Evolved
This move towards age-inclusive language is driven by a greater awareness of ageism—prejudice or discrimination based on a person's age. Many once-standard terms are now considered problematic for several reasons:
- Patronizing tones: Labels like "senior citizen" can sound condescending and imply a separate, dependent social class.
- Negative stereotypes: The word "elderly" often conjures images of frailty, diminished capacity, and helplessness, which do not reflect the vibrant, diverse experiences of many older people.
- Loss of individuality: By grouping all people over a certain age under a single label, these terms strip individuals of their unique identities, experiences, and abilities.
Preferred Terminology: An Overview
Major health and journalistic organizations, including the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Associated Press (AP), have issued guidelines recommending more respectful alternatives. The consensus points towards person-first, neutral language.
The Rise of "Older Adult"
The term "older adult" is now the most widely accepted and polite phrase. It is a neutral descriptor that acknowledges a person's age without assigning stereotypical attributes. By stating "older adult," we are simply noting a life stage without implying disability, frailty, or dependence. This phrase is increasingly used in clinical settings, research, and general media. For instance, the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society requires authors to use "older adult" when describing individuals aged 65 and over.
The Importance of Specificity
When possible, being more specific is even better. Instead of a general label, consider adding details that are relevant to the context. For example, in a medical study, it may be appropriate to specify "older people aged 75 to 84 years". In general conversation, you might reference an individual's profession or role rather than their age group. The goal is to see the person, not just their age.
Navigating Other Terms
While terms like "elder" can be appropriate, especially in cultural contexts where it signifies respect and wisdom (e.g., within certain American Indian/Alaska Native communities), it should be used with caution and only when you know it is preferred. In other situations, it might sound formal or out of place. The best practice is always to ask an individual how they prefer to be addressed.
Comparing Terminology for Older People
| Term | Connotation | Context | Respectfulness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Older Adult | Neutral, accurate | General, medical, professional | High |
| Senior | Often associated with discounts, sometimes seen as patronizing | Business, marketing | Medium to Low |
| Elderly | Suggests frailty, decline, and helplessness | Outdated, often negative | Low |
| Senior Citizen | Outdated, patronizing, can imply dependency | Outdated, formal | Low |
| The Aged | Dehumanizing, groups people into a single category | Avoid at all costs | Very Low |
Moving Beyond Labels to Genuine Respect
Ultimately, the most respectful approach is to move beyond labels and simply treat individuals with dignity. Address people by their name, or with titles like "Sir" or "Ma'am," as appropriate. Avoid using pet names or infantilizing language, such as "sweetie" or "honey," which can be extremely condescending. A person's age does not define their abilities, intelligence, or value.
Demonstrating genuine respect means:
- Engaging in Active Listening: Show that you value their thoughts and experiences, rather than making assumptions based on their age.
- Focusing on Individual Identity: Speak to the person and their individual identity, rather than their age group.
- Avoiding Stereotypes: Recognize the diversity of the aging population and avoid applying broad generalizations.
Conclusion: Choosing Words with Intention
Choosing mindful and respectful language is a simple yet powerful way to counteract ageism and promote a more inclusive society. While "older adults" is the generally polite term to use when a broad label is necessary, the most respectful course of action is to address people as individuals. By moving away from outdated, stigmatizing labels and embracing person-first language, we can foster communication that is both accurate and truly dignified. For more information on avoiding ageist terminology, see the guide on the National Institute on Aging's blog. Don't call me “old”: Avoiding ageism when writing about aging.