Skip to content

Exploring if a tailored exercise intervention for hospitalised older adults have a role in the resolution of delirium secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial?

4 min read

Delirium affects up to 50% of hospitalized older adults, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality. New research investigates could a tailored exercise intervention for hospitalised older adults have a role in the resolution of delirium secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial?, providing critical insight into this vulnerable population's care.

Quick Summary

Evidence from a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial suggests individualized exercise for hospitalized geriatric patients is safe and may help improve the course of delirium. These programs appear feasible and potentially beneficial, especially for those with certain baseline functional statuses.

Key Points

  • Positive Trends: The secondary analysis showed promising trends, with more patients in the exercise group experiencing delirium resolution compared to the control group, though not all results were statistically significant.

  • Intervention Feasibility: The study proved that tailored exercise interventions are feasible and safe to implement for hospitalized older adults, even those with fluctuating delirium.

  • Predictive Marker: Baseline functional status, measured by the Barthel Index, was identified as a potential clinical marker to help identify which patients might benefit most from the exercise intervention.

  • Non-Pharmacological Approach: This research supports exercise as a valuable, non-pharmacological strategy to improve delirium outcomes, complementing existing multicomponent prevention efforts.

  • Safety Profile: The intervention was found to be safe, with no exercise-related adverse events reported, making it a viable option for a vulnerable patient group.

  • Future Direction: The findings highlight the need for larger, well-designed trials to further explore and validate the role of individualized exercise in delirium resolution.

In This Article

Unpacking the Clinical Evidence

Delirium is a serious, fluctuating neurocognitive disorder that is common among older adults admitted to hospitals. It can lead to longer hospital stays, cognitive decline, and increased mortality. While multicomponent interventions have shown promise in prevention, research focusing exclusively on exercise's role in the resolution of delirium has been limited.

A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) provides new and compelling evidence on this topic. The original RCT focused on the functional and cognitive benefits of an individualized exercise intervention for hospitalized older adults. The secondary analysis specifically examined the effect of this program on delirium resolution, offering valuable insights into a complex clinical problem. This comprehensive look at the study’s findings, methodology, and implications offers a deeper understanding of exercise's therapeutic potential.

The Study's Methodology and Participants

This secondary analysis involved 370 hospitalized older adults aged 75 and over. Participants were part of a larger RCT where they were randomized into either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group received a tailored, moderate-intensity exercise regimen twice daily, while the control group received standard care. The secondary analysis focused specifically on participants who developed delirium during their hospitalization. The study carefully tracked delirium resolution and other relevant outcomes to determine if the exercise program had a significant effect.

Key features of the study's design include:

  • Individualized Approach: The exercise plan was customized for each patient, adjusting to their fluctuating physical and cognitive abilities.
  • Focus on Resolution: Unlike many studies focused on prevention, this analysis specifically looked at how the exercise program impacted the duration and resolution of existing delirium.
  • Feasibility Assessment: The study also evaluated the practicalities of implementing such an intervention in a busy hospital setting, particularly with patients experiencing delirium.

Significant Findings from the Analysis

While not reaching statistical significance in all aspects, the secondary analysis revealed encouraging trends. Notably, the intervention group showed a higher rate of delirium improvement compared to the control group. For instance, after the intervention, 84.6% of patients in the exercise group showed improvement in their delirium, versus 68.4% in the control group. While the difference did not reach full statistical significance in this particular study, the clinical implications are notable.

Further analysis indicated:

  • Safety: The study reported no adverse events related to the exercise intervention, confirming its safety profile for this vulnerable population.
  • Baseline Function as a Predictor: Patients with a higher baseline functional status, as measured by the Barthel Index, appeared to benefit most from the intervention. This suggests that pre-existing functional capacity could be a valuable clinical marker for identifying optimal candidates for such programs.
  • Fluctuating Delirium: The study highlighted that even with the fluctuating nature of delirium, structured exercise is feasible during periods when patients can cooperate, suggesting that flexibility is key to implementation.

Exercise Intervention vs. Standard Care: A Comparison

To understand the nuances of the study, it's helpful to compare the two groups' experiences. The table below outlines the key differences in their care and outcomes.

Feature Tailored Exercise Intervention Group Standard Care (Control) Group
Intervention Two daily sessions of moderate-intensity, individualized exercise, tailored to patient ability and fluctuation. Routine hospital care, without a specific, structured exercise regimen focused on delirium.
Delirium Improvement Higher percentage of patients showed improvement in delirium (84.6%). Lower percentage of patients showed improvement (68.4%).
Feasibility Demonstrated that exercise is feasible even during fluctuating delirium, with adherence managed during periods of patient cooperation. Routine mobility promotion may be inconsistent or less intensive, depending on staff availability and patient condition.
Safety No exercise-related adverse events were reported. Standard hospital safety protocols were followed.
Clinical Implication Suggests a promising non-pharmacological approach for managing and potentially resolving delirium. Represents the current standard of practice, often less structured regarding physical activity during delirium.

Implications for Senior Care and Future Research

The findings from this secondary analysis offer important implications for the care of older adults in hospital settings. The evidence supports the integration of tailored, individualized exercise interventions into standard geriatric care protocols. This represents a safe, non-pharmacological strategy that healthcare providers can use to potentially improve patient outcomes.

Healthcare facilities could establish programs where physical therapists or trained staff implement these interventions, focusing on flexibility and adapting to each patient's daily cognitive and physical state. Furthermore, the identification of baseline functional status as a potential predictor for benefit warrants further investigation. This could lead to more targeted, efficient interventions in the future.

Exercise's Broader Role in Delirium Management

Beyond this specific trial, the findings resonate with a broader body of knowledge about exercise and cognitive function. Regular physical activity has been shown to improve cerebral blood flow and neuroplasticity, which are mechanisms believed to be involved in delirium resolution. An individualized, multicomponent exercise program, like the one tested, may be particularly effective due to its ability to address multiple aspects of patient health simultaneously.

The search for non-pharmacological approaches to manage and resolve delirium is critical due to the side effects associated with medication and the complex nature of the condition. Exercise offers a promising and safe alternative or complement to current strategies. The Role of Physical Exercise in Delirium Management, found on PubMed Central, provides more context on this topic.

Conclusion: A Step Toward Targeted Therapy

In summary, the secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial provides compelling, albeit not statistically definitive, evidence that a tailored exercise intervention for hospitalised older adults can play a role in the resolution of delirium. While more large-scale trials are needed to confirm these findings with statistical significance, the study demonstrated that the intervention is safe and feasible, and pointed to important predictors of success. This research paves the way for a more targeted and effective approach to managing delirium in this high-risk population, offering hope for improved cognitive and functional outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Delirium is a serious disturbance in mental abilities that results in confused thinking and a decreased awareness of one's environment. It typically has a rapid onset and can fluctuate in severity throughout the day. It is often triggered by an acute illness or surgery in older adults.

Hospitalized older adults are especially vulnerable to delirium due to pre-existing vulnerabilities, acute illness, medication side effects, and environmental changes. Delirium in this population is associated with worse outcomes, including longer hospital stays, institutionalization, and increased mortality.

The intervention involved two daily sessions of moderate-intensity, individualized exercises. The program was specifically adapted to each patient’s physical and cognitive capabilities, ensuring it was appropriate for their fluctuating health status.

While the analysis showed a higher rate of delirium improvement in the exercise group, the differences did not reach statistical significance in all measured outcomes. The findings, however, were clinically encouraging and pointed to a positive trend.

Yes, based on this secondary analysis, the tailored exercise intervention was found to be safe, with no exercise-related adverse events reported. The program was adapted to the patients' needs, minimizing risk.

These findings could encourage hospitals to integrate structured, tailored physical activity programs into standard geriatric care. By making exercise a part of the treatment plan, hospitals could potentially improve patient outcomes related to delirium.

A secondary analysis re-examines existing trial data to answer new research questions not addressed in the primary study. This allows researchers to maximize the value of clinical trial data and uncover additional insights without the cost and time of conducting a new trial.

Other studies, including multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions, have shown that exercise and mobility promotion can help prevent delirium. This specific secondary analysis focused on the role of exercise in the resolution of existing delirium, complementing the knowledge base around prevention.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.