Why Language Matters in Healthy Aging
The words we use to describe people reflect our attitudes and can either reinforce stereotypes or promote respect. For many years, terms like "elderly" were standard, but modern understanding of age and health has changed. Ageism, or discrimination based on age, is a pervasive issue, and language is one of the primary ways it is perpetuated. Moving away from potentially demeaning labels toward more person-centered language helps to foster a more inclusive and accurate view of aging, emphasizing individuality and capability rather than perceived frailty.
Preferred Terms for Describing Older Individuals
When seeking an alternative for what is another word for elderly person, several options are available. The best choice is often one that is specific, respectful, and acknowledges the diversity within the older population.
Older Adults or Older Persons
Most style guides, including the American Medical Association and Associated Press, now recommend "older adults" or "older persons" as neutral and accurate descriptions. These terms are broad, non-specific, and avoid the negative, paternalistic undertones that can accompany phrases like "elderly." They simply describe a stage of life without judgment or stereotype. For example, instead of saying "the elderly population," it is more precise and respectful to say "the older adult population".
Seniors or Senior Citizens
While historically common, the terms "seniors" or "senior citizens" are increasingly falling out of favor among older adults themselves. Some find the terms to be "othering" or to imply a dependent status. However, they are still widely used, particularly in contexts like discounts or specific community programs. It is generally best to gauge personal preference or use a more neutral term if unsure.
Elders
The word "elders" can be a highly respectful term, but its use is context-dependent. In many cultures, particularly within Indigenous American and other non-Western societies, "elder" denotes a position of wisdom, respect, and seniority. It is important to be mindful of this cultural context and to use the term only when appropriate and with genuine respect. Generalizing this term can strip it of its specific, culturally significant meaning.
Age-Specific Descriptions
For clarity and accuracy, especially in health-related contexts, using specific age ranges is often best. Terms like "people 65 and older" or "individuals in their 80s" are unambiguous. This avoids lumping a diverse group of people into a single category and acknowledges the significant differences between, for example, a 65-year-old and a 95-year-old.
Comparison of Terminology
| Term | Connotation | Best For | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Older Adults/Persons | Neutral, respectful, modern | General writing, clinical settings, formal communications | Widely accepted, avoids stereotypes |
| Seniors/Senior Citizens | Can be paternalistic, but still common | Contexts of specific programs, discounts; use with caution | Some older adults dislike these labels |
| Elders | Respectful, reverential, wisdom-associated | Culturally specific contexts; use with awareness and sensitivity | Avoids stereotyping, but can be inappropriate outside of specific cultural contexts |
| Age-Specific Terms | Specific, clinical, accurate | Research, data analysis, medical reports | Very clear, but less personal for individual address |
Reframing the Narrative Around Aging
Beyond specific words, the entire narrative surrounding aging is being reframed. Instead of focusing on decline and loss, there is a growing movement to highlight the positive aspects of later life. Words like "golden-ager" or "seasoned soul" are emerging to reflect experience, wisdom, and vitality. This shift promotes a more positive and empowering view, emphasizing the value and contribution of older individuals to society.
This reframing combats common myths about aging, such as the idea that older adults are less happy, less productive, or unable to learn new things. Organizations like the National Institute on Aging provide resources to help people, including content creators and communicators, use more inclusive and respectful language. By choosing our words carefully, we can help dismantle harmful stereotypes and build a more equitable and respectful society for people of all ages.
The Importance of Person-First Language
For individuals with health conditions, person-first language is always the best practice. For example, rather than saying "the diabetic elderly man," one would say "the man with diabetes who is 75 years old." This puts the individual before their condition and avoids defining them by their illness or age group. It is a simple but powerful way to communicate respect and dignity. This practice is emphasized in geriatric care and across healthcare to ensure the focus remains on the person.
Conclusion: Making a Mindful Choice
In short, while "elderly person" was once standard, better alternatives are now available and widely preferred. By opting for terms like "older adult" or using specific age ranges, we can use language that is more respectful, accurate, and aligned with modern understanding of aging. The most powerful choice, however, is to simply ask for an individual's preferred term. This approach prioritizes personal dignity and ensures communication is always considerate and person-centered. The shift toward more mindful language is a key step in combatting ageism and promoting a healthier, more dignified aging experience for everyone.
For more on fostering positive perceptions and practices around aging, consider exploring resources from authoritative organizations. Learn about promoting dignity and well-being for older adults at this authoritative resource.
