Skip to content

What is the mortality rate for non operative hip fractures?

4 min read

Studies have shown that for very frail patients, non-operative hip fracture treatment can have a one-year mortality rate exceeding 70%, driven by complications rather than the fracture itself. Understanding the severity of non-operative outcomes is crucial when asking, what is the mortality rate for non operative hip fractures?

Quick Summary

The mortality rate for non-operative hip fractures is substantially higher than for surgically managed ones, with one-year rates often ranging from 45% to over 70% in geriatric populations. This increased risk is primarily linked to complications from prolonged immobility, such as pneumonia and blood clots, especially in frail, elderly patients with significant comorbidities.

Key Points

  • High Mortality Rate: Non-operative hip fractures have a significantly higher mortality rate than surgically managed ones, with one-year rates often exceeding 45% in studies.

  • Complications of Immobility: The primary drivers of non-operative mortality are complications from bed rest, such as pneumonia, blood clots (DVT/PE), and pressure ulcers.

  • Patient Frailty: Patients chosen for non-operative care are typically the frailest, with existing comorbidities like dementia and heart disease, which independently increase mortality risk.

  • Poor Prognosis: Conservative treatment often leads to poor functional outcomes, including permanent loss of independent mobility and a higher likelihood of long-term care.

  • Risk Factors: Key predictors of higher mortality in non-operative patients include advanced age, male sex, pre-existing comorbidities, poor cognitive status, and limited pre-injury mobility.

  • Early Mobilization is Key: Surgery is favored because it allows for earlier mobilization, which helps prevent the life-threatening complications associated with prolonged immobility.

In This Article

A Closer Look at Non-Operative Outcomes

When an elderly person suffers a hip fracture, the immediate decision on a course of treatment is critical. While surgery is the standard of care for most hip fractures, some patients, particularly the very frail or those with severe pre-existing health conditions, may be deemed too high-risk for an operation. In these cases, non-operative, or conservative, management is pursued. The outcome, however, is often bleak, with a high mortality rate for non operative hip fractures that demands careful consideration.

The Stark Reality of Mortality Statistics

Published studies indicate that non-operative hip fracture treatment in elderly patients is associated with high mortality rates. One meta-analysis found pooled mortality rates of 36% at 30 days, 46% at six months, and 60% at one year. Another study comparing non-operative and operative patients reported a 1-year mortality rate of 46.1% for the non-operative group, which was more than double the rate of a matched surgical cohort. In extremely frail populations, such as nursing home residents with advanced dementia, one small study observed a very high one-month mortality rate.

These statistics suggest that non-operative care is not necessarily a safer option for many elderly patients. The high mortality is often not from the fracture itself but from the complications that arise due to prolonged bed rest and immobility required during conservative treatment. Surgical intervention, while having its own risks, aims to stabilize the fracture and allow for earlier mobilization, which helps prevent these complications.

Why are Non-Operative Patients at Such High Risk?

Non-operative management typically involves an extended period of immobility, which increases the risk of various severe complications. These include the formation of blood clots, such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which can lead to a life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE) if a clot travels to the lungs. Reduced mobility also makes patients more susceptible to pneumonia. Prolonged pressure on the skin can result in pressure ulcers, or bedsores, which are painful and can become infected. Lack of movement also contributes to muscle atrophy, making recovery of mobility more difficult. Furthermore, extended bed rest and pain can negatively impact mental and cognitive function, particularly in those with pre-existing conditions like dementia.

Patients selected for non-operative treatment often have underlying health issues, such as a high Charlson Comorbidity Index, poor cognitive function, and limited mobility before the fracture, which independently contribute to worse outcomes.

Understanding the Conservative Treatment Process

For patients unable to undergo surgery, conservative treatment focuses on managing symptoms and providing supportive care. This typically involves:

  1. Pain Management: Medications, including opioids, are used to control fracture-related pain, with careful monitoring for side effects.
  2. Activity Modification: Depending on the fracture, patients may be advised to limit or avoid weight-bearing for a period, often requiring assistive devices like wheelchairs or walkers.
  3. Physical Therapy: Therapists assist in maintaining range of motion and muscle strength. Early mobilization, even in a wheelchair, can be beneficial.
  4. Bone Stimulation: In certain cases, electrical current or ultrasound may be used to potentially aid bone healing, although its efficacy in this patient group is less clear.
  5. Monitoring and Rehabilitation: Regular follow-up is necessary to track healing progress, manage pain, and adjust the rehabilitation plan. Nutritional support, including calcium and vitamin D, is also important.

Comparison: Operative vs. Non-Operative Management

Comparing the outcomes of operative and non-operative management is essential for patients and their families when making treatment decisions.

Feature Non-Operative Management Operative Management
One-Year Mortality Rate Significantly higher (45-70%+ in many studies) Lower (e.g., 18% in matched cohort study)
Primary Cause of Death Complications of prolonged immobility (e.g., pneumonia, PE) Surgical or anesthesia complications, or pre-existing conditions
Pain Management Relies on medication; potential for long-term discomfort due to non-union Surgery stabilizes the fracture, reducing pain significantly post-op
Long-Term Mobility Severely limited; many patients become permanently bedridden or wheelchair-dependent Aims for early mobilization and improved long-term functional recovery
Healing Outcome Higher risk of malunion (healing in incorrect position) or non-union (failure to heal) Stabilized fracture promotes proper healing and reduces long-term complications
Patient Population Often limited to the most frail, high-risk patients unsuitable for surgery Standard treatment for most patients, regardless of age, with careful risk assessment

For more detailed information on operative versus non-operative management strategies, refer to academic and clinical resources like this article from the National Institutes of Health.

Factors That Influence Non-Operative Outcomes

Several factors can influence the mortality risk for patients undergoing non-operative hip fracture treatment. These include advanced age, with older individuals (over 75 or 80) facing a higher risk. Male sex has also been associated with a greater mortality risk compared to females. The presence of multiple chronic health conditions, known as a high comorbidity burden, such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, negatively impacts outcomes. Poor cognitive status, including dementia, is another significant predictor of reduced survival. Additionally, patients who had limited mobility before their fracture are at higher risk.

Conclusion: A Difficult Choice with Serious Consequences

Choosing non-operative treatment for a hip fracture is a complex decision typically made for patients whose overall health makes surgery too risky. However, evidence shows that conservative management is associated with a significantly higher mortality rate, largely due to complications from prolonged immobility. While avoiding the immediate risks of surgery, patients face a different set of substantial long-term risks. A comprehensive, individualized assessment by a healthcare team is crucial to ensure patients and families are fully informed about the high mortality rate for non operative hip fractures and the likely prognosis.

Frequently Asked Questions

While rates can vary significantly depending on the patient's overall health, published studies show that the one-year mortality rate for non-operative hip fractures can be over 45%, and potentially much higher in very frail populations, compared to surgically treated patients.

The high mortality is primarily caused by complications arising from prolonged immobility. These include deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), pneumonia, and bedsores, which are particularly dangerous for elderly or frail individuals.

Leading causes of death include respiratory illnesses like pneumonia and cardiovascular events such as pulmonary embolism, which are both linked to extended periods of bed rest. Pre-existing health conditions also play a major role.

Yes. The mortality risk is especially high for very frail patients, those with advanced dementia, a high number of comorbidities, or those residing in nursing homes. These individuals often have a poor prognosis even without a fracture.

The mortality rate for non-operative treatment is substantially higher than for operative treatment. Surgical intervention allows for earlier mobilization, which is key to preventing the life-threatening complications of immobility.

Non-operative treatment focuses on pain management with medication, limiting or restricting weight-bearing on the affected leg, and starting physical therapy to maintain other functions. Assistive devices like wheelchairs or walkers are used for mobility.

For non-displaced fractures, conservative treatment may allow the bone to heal. However, for most hip fractures, especially displaced ones, non-operative management carries a high risk of poor healing (malunion or non-union) in addition to severe complications.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.