Skip to content

What is the new term for seniors?

3 min read

According to a 2021 study, the majority of older Americans prefer inclusive labels like “older adults” and “mature adults” over traditional terms like “seniors”. This shift in language reflects a broader societal push for age-inclusive communication that respects individual identity and combats ageism. So, what is the new term for seniors, and why does it matter?

Quick Summary

The most widely recommended and accepted term is "older adults," often used interchangeably with "older persons" or "older people" by major medical, psychological, and journalistic organizations. This person-first language avoids negative stereotypes and emphasizes respect for the individual.

Key Points

  • Shift in Terminology: The most recommended and respectful term is "older adults," moving away from outdated labels like "seniors" and "the elderly".

  • Combatting Ageism: Using person-first language helps avoid harmful stereotypes and discrimination based on age, known as ageism.

  • Professional Standards: Major organizations like the American Medical Association and the Associated Press have adopted "older adults" in their style guides.

  • Promoting Inclusion: The newer terminology reflects the diverse, active, and vibrant lives of many older individuals today, moving past antiquated portrayals.

  • Specificity Matters: When possible, it is best to be more specific, such as "people over 65" or referring to an individual's specific age.

  • Words Have Power: Respectful language shapes positive attitudes toward aging and acknowledges the contributions and individuality of older persons.

In This Article

Why the Shift from 'Seniors' to 'Older Adults'?

For decades, terms like "seniors" and "senior citizens" were commonplace. However, as our understanding of aging has evolved, so too has our language. Research and advocacy have highlighted the pitfalls of these traditional terms, which can carry outdated, negative, and even patronizing connotations. The movement toward more inclusive language is driven by several key factors.

Combating Ageism

Ageism is discrimination and stereotyping based on age. Traditional terms can inadvertently reinforce ageist beliefs, painting older individuals as a monolithic group that is frail, diminished, or dependent. Using person-first language, such as "older adults," helps to counter these stereotypes by focusing on the individual's humanity rather than reducing them to their age bracket. This encourages a more respectful, positive attitude toward aging and older people in general.

Reflecting Modern Longevity

People are living longer, healthier, and more active lives than ever before. The stereotypical image of a "senior" is no longer representative of many people in their 60s, 70s, 80s, and beyond. Many older adults continue to work, travel, and engage in vigorous physical and mental activities. A term like "older adult" is more aligned with this modern reality, suggesting that age is just one aspect of a person's life, not the defining characteristic.

Aligning with Professional Guidelines

Prominent professional and journalistic organizations have officially moved away from outdated language. The American Medical Association, American Psychological Association, and Associated Press Stylebook all recommend or prefer terms like "older adults" or "older persons" over "seniors" and "the elderly". This institutional shift signals a broader consensus that more respectful language is necessary in both clinical and everyday communication. The National Institute on Aging provides further guidance on avoiding ageism when writing about aging.

Preferred Terminology: A Spectrum of Choices

While "older adults" is a widely accepted, general term, other options exist depending on the context. The best choice is often to be as specific as possible or to ask for an individual's preference.

Specificity is Key

For many situations, the most respectful approach is to be specific rather than using a broad label. For example, instead of a general reference, you could refer to "people over 65," "individuals in their 70s," or "retirees". This approach acknowledges the diversity within the aging population and avoids lumping people into one category.

Other Inclusive Terms

  • Mature adults: Some people prefer this term, which focuses on experience and wisdom rather than simply age.
  • People living with X: In a healthcare context, person-first language emphasizes the individual over their condition. For example, a "person with dementia" instead of a "dementia patient".

Table: Language Comparison for Talking About Older Adults

Feature Older Adults (Preferred) Seniors / Senior Citizens (Outdated) The Elderly (Outdated/Negative)
Focus Person-first, acknowledging individuality and respect. Age-based, often carrying outdated assumptions of dependence. Problem-focused, implying frailty and decline.
Connotation Neutral, respectful, and inclusive. Can be patronizing or associated with fixed-income or institutionalized living. Often used to imply a state of general decline, which many people find offensive.
Professional Use Recommended by AMA, APA, AP Stylebook, and Gerontological Society of America. Declined in professional use; seen as antiquated. Strongly discouraged in all professional and respectful contexts.
Effect Empowers the individual and promotes a positive view of aging. Reinforces an "us-versus-them" mentality. Reinforces negative stereotypes and ageism.

Conclusion: The Power of Respectful Language

The quest for a new, universally accepted term for "seniors" highlights a crucial shift in societal attitudes towards aging. By moving away from stigmatizing labels and embracing person-first language, we can foster a more respectful and inclusive environment for older adults. Using "older adults" or more specific descriptions is not merely a matter of political correctness but a conscious choice to acknowledge the diversity, strength, and contributions of an entire generation. Ultimately, the language we choose shapes perception, and a vocabulary of respect helps ensure that older adults are seen for who they are: valuable, contributing members of society.

Frequently Asked Questions

The term "senior citizen" is considered outdated and can carry negative connotations, often associated with dependence or a limited stage of life. Research shows that many older Americans prefer more inclusive terms that don't define them solely by their age.

The best alternatives are "older adults," "older persons," or "older people". These terms are more respectful and inclusive, focusing on the person rather than defining them by their age group.

Using a person's specific age (e.g., "an 85-year-old woman") is often the most accurate and respectful approach, especially when the information is relevant. It avoids generalization and recognizes their individual journey.

No, it is best to avoid the term "elderly." It often implies frailty and diminished capacity, which are negative stereotypes that do not accurately represent most older adults. Many older individuals find this term offensive.

Respectful, person-first language helps combat ageism by shifting the focus from a person's age to their individuality and value as a human being. It challenges negative assumptions and promotes a more positive and dignified view of aging.

Individual preference should always be respected. While most older adults prefer alternative terms, some may still use or identify with "senior". In such cases, it is appropriate to use the term they prefer when speaking to or about them.

For official guidance, you can refer to the style guides of respected organizations like the American Medical Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Institute on Aging. Many government and healthcare sites also provide excellent resources.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.