Skip to content

When was sarcopenia classified as a disease?

2 min read

In a landmark moment for geriatric medicine, sarcopenia was formally recognized as a disease in 2016 with its own ICD-10-CM code. This official classification, marking when was sarcopenia classified as a disease, significantly elevated the condition's status for diagnosis and research.

Quick Summary

Sarcopenia was officially designated as a disease on October 1, 2016, by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, receiving the ICD-10-CM code M62.84. This classification has helped clinicians better diagnose and manage the condition.

Key Points

  • Formal Recognition: Sarcopenia was formally classified as a disease on October 1, 2016, with its own ICD-10-CM code (M62.84).

  • Historical Context: The term "sarcopenia" was first coined by Dr. Irving Rosenberg in 1989 to describe age-related muscle mass decline.

  • Key Diagnostic Shift: Modern diagnostic criteria, updated by groups like EWGSOP2 in 2018, shifted focus to include low muscle strength as a primary indicator, in addition to mass.

  • Clinical Impact: The disease classification increases awareness, facilitates research funding, and helps healthcare providers diagnose and bill for the condition more accurately.

  • Future Focus: Recognizing sarcopenia as a disease is expected to accelerate research into new diagnostic tools and pharmaceutical treatments, though lifestyle interventions like exercise and nutrition remain key.

In This Article

The Origins of the Sarcopenia Concept

The term "sarcopenia" originates from Greek words for "flesh" (sarx) and "poverty" (penia). Geriatrician Dr. Irwin Rosenberg first coined it in 1989 to describe age-related muscle mass decline. Early definitions primarily focused on this loss of skeletal muscle mass. Although the connection between aging, muscle loss, and reduced physical function was acknowledged, a consistent definition and diagnostic criteria were lacking for many years. Sarcopenia was often viewed as a normal part of aging rather than a specific medical condition needing diagnosis and treatment.

The Shift Towards Function and Strength

Research later showed that losing muscle strength (dynapenia) predicts negative outcomes like falls and disability more effectively than losing muscle mass alone. This led expert groups to update diagnostic methods. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) recommended diagnosis based on low muscle mass and low muscle function in 2010. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) created diagnostic criteria for Asian populations in 2014. Updated guidelines from EWGSOP (EWGSOP2) in 2018 emphasized low muscle strength as a primary diagnostic factor. These changes reflect a deeper understanding that muscle strength is a crucial and often more clinically relevant indicator of sarcopenia's effects.

The Official Classification with ICD-10

The formal classification of sarcopenia as a disease in 2016 marked a crucial turning point for geriatric care. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) approved a unique ICD-10-CM code for sarcopenia, effective October 1, 2016.

The M62.84 Code

  • Code: M62.84
  • Designation: Sarcopenia
  • Significance: This code allowed sarcopenia to be officially documented and billed for by healthcare providers.

This classification moved sarcopenia from a general age-related condition to a specific, formal diagnosis with several benefits:

  1. Increased Awareness: Encourages physicians to screen and diagnose more often, particularly in older adults.
  2. Facilitated Research: The code helps track how common sarcopenia is, study its effects, and secure funding for developing treatments.
  3. Improved Billing: Allows for billing for the condition, providing financial reasons to diagnose and treat sarcopenia.
  4. Enhanced Clinical Focus: Promotes specific treatments like exercise and nutritional advice instead of just accepting muscle loss as part of aging.

Interventions and Future Outlook

The classification of sarcopenia as a disease has driven the search for effective interventions. Key strategies include resistance exercise and nutritional intervention. The ICD-10 code has increased pharmaceutical interest in creating new sarcopenia drugs, similar to osteoporosis research. While promising, no such drugs are currently approved.

The history of defining and classifying sarcopenia shows a change from seeing age-related decline as unavoidable to actively diagnosing and managing a treatable condition, ultimately aiming to improve the quality of life for older adults.

For more detailed information on sarcopenia definition and diagnostic criteria, visit {Link: NIH https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5114626/}.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sarcopenia was formally recognized as a disease on October 1, 2016, when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) assigned it a specific ICD-10-CM code, M62.84.

The ICD-10-CM code for sarcopenia is M62.84. This code allows healthcare providers to officially document and bill for the condition.

The official classification was significant because it elevated sarcopenia from being just a symptom of aging to a distinct, diagnosable disease. This increased awareness, boosted research funding, and improved diagnostic and treatment efforts.

The term "sarcopenia" was first coined by Dr. Irwin Rosenberg in 1989 to describe the age-related loss of muscle mass.

Initially focused solely on muscle mass loss, the definition evolved through the work of expert groups like EWGSOP. It now includes low muscle strength as a primary diagnostic factor, reflecting its stronger link to functional outcomes.

No, while both involve muscle wasting, they are distinct. Sarcopenia is primarily an age-related condition, whereas cachexia is typically driven by an underlying inflammatory disease, such as cancer or chronic kidney disease.

Management typically involves lifestyle interventions, with resistance exercise being a cornerstone of treatment. Nutritional support, particularly ensuring adequate protein intake, is also a key component.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.