Skip to content

Who is the jury for the AARP Purpose Prize?

4 min read

Since 2005, the Purpose Prize has celebrated outstanding social-impact achievements by individuals age 50 and over. An annual panel of experts evaluates a pool of applicants to determine the winners, but who is the jury for the AARP Purpose Prize that makes these crucial selection decisions?

Quick Summary

The AARP Purpose Prize jury is a distinguished panel of national leaders from various fields, including journalism, nonprofits, and academia. This group reviews and recommends winners, with final approval granted by an AARP executive.

Key Points

  • Distinguished Panel: The jury is a panel of national leaders from diverse fields such as journalism, academia, and nonprofits.

  • Involves AARP Staff: The review process and jury include members of the AARP staff to help align selections with the organization's mission.

  • Multi-Round Selection: The process involves several rounds of review by different groups of experts before the final jury deliberation.

  • Evaluates Impact and Story: The jury evaluates applicants based on criteria such as the social problem addressed, organizational impact, and the founder's personal journey.

  • Final Approval by Executive: While the jury recommends the winners, an AARP executive provides the final stamp of approval.

  • Recognizes Lived Experience: A key criterion is how a founder's experience after the age of 50 impacted their approach to their social venture.

In This Article

A Distinguished Panel of Leaders

The jury for the AARP Purpose Prize is composed of a diverse group of national leaders, experts, and thinkers. These individuals are selected for their extensive experience and sound judgment across a range of sectors, including nonprofits, academia, innovation, and entertainment. The makeup of the panel is dynamic, with members often changing each year to bring fresh perspectives to the selection process.

While the specific individuals on the jury may vary, the consistent theme is a dedication to recognizing social innovation in the second half of life. For example, past and recent juries have included prominent figures such as authors, philanthropists, and executives from influential organizations. The diversity of the jury ensures that all applications are reviewed through a broad lens, considering the impact of a founder's work from multiple angles.

The Role of AARP Staff

In addition to external leaders, the jury often includes AARP staff members. This collaboration between internal and external reviewers ensures that the selection process is grounded in AARP's mission while also benefiting from outside expertise. This tiered approach is a key part of the robust selection process.

The Multi-Round Selection Process

Determining the recipients of the AARP Purpose Prize is a comprehensive, multi-stage process designed to identify truly impactful and inspiring social innovators. The journey from applicant to winner involves several key rounds:

  • Round 1: Applicant Review. All eligible applications are reviewed by a group of external reviewers. This initial screening narrows the field to a smaller group of promising candidates.
  • Round 2: Candidate Selection. The pool is further refined, with AARP staff reviewers and external experts selecting semi-finalists.
  • Round 3: Finalist Review. The process continues with a selection of finalists, who then proceed to the final round of consideration.
  • Round 4: Finalist Interviews and Jury Selection. The finalist round involves interviews with the prestigious jury of external reviewers and AARP staff. The jury then selects up to five winners, which is subject to final approval by an AARP executive.

Detailed Judging Criteria

Throughout the review process, applicants are evaluated based on a set of weighted criteria to ensure a fair and thorough assessment. These criteria highlight the core mission of the Purpose Prize, focusing on the impact and personal journey of the founder.

Evaluation Criteria Scoring Emphasis Description
Problem & Solution Strong Does the application clearly define a compelling social problem and offer a well-structured, proven strategy to solve it?
Impact Measurement Highest How does the organization track and measure its benefits? Clear metrics and tangible results are crucial.
Personal Story & Motivation Strong The founder's inspiration and the clear connection between their lived experience and their work are evaluated.
Experience After 50 Key How has being 50 or older uniquely impacted their approach to and success in their work?
Organizational Sustainability High The long-term viability of the organization is assessed, including its funding, resources, and strategic vision.
Populations Served Important Is there a clear definition of the clients served and the geographic reach of the organization?

Final Approval and Commitment to Diversity

While the jury plays a vital role in recommending the winners, the final decision ultimately rests with an AARP executive. This step serves as a final quality check, ensuring that the selected honorees align perfectly with the organization's mission of empowering people to choose how they live as they age.

Furthermore, AARP has a strong commitment to diversity, inclusion, and equity in its review process. The staff and jury are tasked with uplifting voices and recognizing the lived experiences of all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or disability status. This commitment underscores the prize's purpose to recognize innovation from all corners of America.

A Legacy of Honoring Purpose

Initially launched by Encore.org, AARP took over the Purpose Prize in 2016, continuing its legacy of recognizing the incredible contributions of older adults. The award serves as a powerful reminder that life experience can be a catalyst for creating a better future for everyone. Understanding who is the jury for the AARP Purpose Prize provides valuable insight into the thoughtfulness and rigor behind this celebrated award.

For more information on the award and the people who make it happen, visit the official AARP Purpose Prize page Learn more about the AARP Purpose Prize here.

In summary, the selection of Purpose Prize winners is not a casual decision but a careful and thoughtful process conducted by a panel of distinguished experts. This jury, with the final approval of an AARP executive, ensures that the most deserving individuals are recognized for their impactful work, leveraging their lifetime of knowledge for good.

Frequently Asked Questions

The jury for the AARP Purpose Prize is a panel of national leaders from various sectors, including nonprofits, academia, and business, who review and interview finalists.

Yes, AARP staff are involved in the review process and may serve on the jury alongside external reviewers to select the winners.

The selection is a multi-round process. It begins with initial reviews by external experts, moves to AARP staff reviews, and culminates in a final interview and selection by the jury.

The jury evaluates applicants based on criteria such as the clarity of the problem addressed, the organization's approach, its impact, its sustainability, and the founder's personal story.

The independent panel of jurors makes recommendations for the winners, but the final decision is subject to the approval of an AARP executive.

No, the jury is a rotating panel of distinguished national leaders, ensuring a fresh and diverse perspective each year.

AARP is committed to diversity and inclusion, with its review process and jury designed to uplift the voices and experiences of people from all backgrounds.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.