Skip to content

Is It Okay to Use the Term "Elderly"?

4 min read

In a 2022 review of medical journals, researchers found that publications continued to use language older adults found stigmatizing, including the word elderly. This guide explores the nuances of age-inclusive language, helping you choose respectful and accurate terminology for healthy aging and senior care.

Quick Summary

Using specific, person-first language like 'older adults' is now widely preferred over 'elderly,' a term that often carries vague, negative, and stereotypical connotations. This shift reflects a move towards more respectful, individualized communication.

Key Points

  • Term 'Elderly' Is Problematic: The term 'elderly' is often considered outdated and disrespectful due to its vague, stereotypical, and negative connotations.

  • Preferred Alternatives Exist: Using 'older adults,' 'older people,' or specific age ranges (e.g., 'people over 65') is recommended for respectful communication.

  • Language Influences Health: Ageist language and stereotypes have been linked to poorer physical and mental health outcomes in older people, while positive language can foster better health.

  • Focus on the Individual: Prioritize person-first language and acknowledge an older adult's individuality rather than grouping them into a generalized category.

  • Practice Age-Inclusive Communication: Listen to personal preferences, avoid harmful euphemisms, and educate others on why conscious language choices are important.

  • Review Written Materials: For professionals, it is crucial to audit and update all written communication to eliminate outdated and ageist terminology.

In This Article

The Evolution of Language in Senior Care

Language is a dynamic and ever-evolving tool. The words we use reflect our understanding and attitudes toward various groups, and the vocabulary surrounding aging is no exception. For decades, terms like "the elderly" were common in both professional and casual contexts. However, a growing awareness of ageism and the importance of person-first language has led to a major shift. The focus has moved from using broad, often dehumanizing labels to adopting more specific, respectful, and empowering terminology that acknowledges individuality and diversity within the older population.

The Problem with "Elderly": Why It's Often Avoided

While the term "elderly" may be intended as a neutral descriptor, it has become problematic for several reasons:

  • It's Inaccurate and Vague: What age does "elderly" refer to? The definition varies widely, often conjuring a stereotype of someone frail or dependent, which does not represent the full spectrum of older adults' health and capabilities. A robust, active 80-year-old is vastly different from a bedridden 80-year-old, yet both could be labeled as "elderly."
  • It Promotes "Othering": Phrases like "the elderly" treat older adults as a monolithic, separate group rather than a diverse collection of individuals. This creates a distance between "us" (the non-elderly) and "them" (the elderly), reinforcing ageist attitudes.
  • It Carries Negative Connotations: Over time, the word has absorbed negative implications associated with physical decline, helplessness, and outdatedness. Many older adults find the term condescending or insulting. In a European survey, older people reported a "forceful rejection" of the term, preferring "older" or "senior" instead.
  • It Has No Specific Counterpart: As some sources have pointed out, there is no corresponding term like "pederly" for younger people, highlighting the bias embedded in the word's usage. This asymmetrical language further stigmatizes aging.

Preferred Alternatives for Respectful Communication

Instead of falling back on outdated terms, professionals and families can use language that is both accurate and respectful. The key is to focus on the person, not just their age.

  1. Older Adults or Older People: This is the most widely recommended and neutral terminology. It is broad but respectful and avoids negative associations. When possible, specify the age range for greater clarity, such as "adults aged 65 and older."
  2. Using Specific Age Ranges: When precision is required, referencing a specific age range is best. For example, a study might focus on "people between 75 and 85 years old." This avoids generalization.
  3. Person-First Language: When discussing a medical condition or physical state, put the person first. Instead of "an arthritic patient," say "a person with arthritis." This recognizes that the individual is more than their diagnosis.
  4. Avoid Euphemisms: Phrases like "golden years" or "of a certain age" can be condescending and suggest there is something shameful about aging. Direct and honest language is always best.

The Impact of Language on Health and Well-being

The psychological effects of ageist language and negative stereotypes are well-documented. Research has shown that ageism can lead to poorer physical and mental health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and even earlier death in older adults. On the other hand, adopting positive age beliefs can significantly improve health.

Yale University's School of Public Health published a study showing that older people who hold positive beliefs about aging are more likely to recover from cognitive decline. This demonstrates the powerful connection between mindset, reinforced by language, and physical health. By using respectful language, we don't just change our speech—we help foster a more positive and empowering environment for older adults, which can have tangible health benefits.

Best Practices for Age-Inclusive Communication

  • Listen to Personal Preference: If an individual has a preferred term, use it. Some people may prefer being called a "senior," while others strongly dislike it. When in doubt, ask.
  • Focus on the Person, Not the Age: Start conversations by addressing the individual by name and focusing on their unique characteristics, interests, and contributions rather than their age.
  • Educate Others: Gently correct others who use ageist language. Explaining the reasons behind the shift in terminology can raise awareness and promote more respectful communication.
  • Review Written Materials: For healthcare providers and writers, it's crucial to review all materials, from intake forms to marketing brochures, to ensure they use inclusive language. Avoid terms like "the aged" or "senior citizen" that many older adults find offensive.
Outdated/Problematic Terms Preferred/Inclusive Alternatives
General Reference The elderly, seniors, the aged Older adults, older people, persons 65 and over
Medical Context Senile, geriatric patient Cognitive decline, person with dementia, older patient
Vague Reference Golden years, of a certain age Later life, retirement years
Group Identification Elderly couple, senior citizen Older couple, retired person

Conclusion: Making Conscious Language Choices

The move away from the term "elderly" is more than a matter of political correctness; it is a critical step toward recognizing the dignity and individuality of older adults. Language has a direct impact on how we perceive others and how they, in turn, perceive themselves. By consciously choosing respectful, person-first terminology, we can combat ageism and help create a more positive narrative around the aging process. This improves communication, enhances well-being, and ensures that healthy aging and senior care are discussed with the respect they deserve. We must all remember that as people live longer, more vibrant lives, the labels we use must evolve with them.

Further Resources

To learn more about the link between language and health, and for additional guidance on age-inclusive communication, consider reviewing official recommendations from leading health organizations. You can find excellent resources, including guidelines on avoiding ageist language, on the National Institute on Aging blog [https://www.nia.nih.gov/research/blog/2023/12/dont-call-me-old-avoiding-ageism-when-writing-about-aging].

Frequently Asked Questions

The term "senior" is less controversial than "elderly," but it can still be seen as outdated or generic by some. Many older adults prefer more specific, person-first language like "older adult" or simply being addressed by their name. It's best to observe an individual's preference.

The term "elderly" is often seen as offensive because it promotes a stereotype of frailty and dependency. It also lumps a diverse group of individuals into a single, impersonal category, which many older adults find dehumanizing and disrespectful.

The best and most respectful term is "older adult" or "older person." If context allows, using a specific age range (e.g., "people aged 80 and over") is even better. Ultimately, addressing someone by their name is the most respectful approach.

Studies have shown a link between ageist language and negative health outcomes, including poorer mental and physical health, increased stress, and even reduced longevity. Adopting positive age beliefs, which starts with respectful language, can help counteract these effects.

It is not always necessary to correct someone publicly, but you can gently and privately educate them on the reasons why more inclusive language is preferred. Explaining the context can help foster better communication without causing embarrassment.

Many older adults consider "senior citizen" to be outdated and impersonal, with some associating it with institutionalized settings. Just like with "elderly," a preference for this term varies, so using person-first alternatives is generally the safest and most respectful approach.

Person-first language emphasizes the individual over their condition. Instead of saying "the Alzheimer's patient," you would say "the person with Alzheimer's." This ensures that the individual's humanity is prioritized over their health status.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.