Skip to content

What is the controversy with Fosamax?

4 min read

Originally approved in 1995, Fosamax, a bisphosphonate used to treat osteoporosis, was once considered a breakthrough treatment. However, a series of adverse event reports and lawsuits have ignited the controversy with Fosamax regarding its long-term safety and manufacturer warnings.

Quick Summary

The controversy surrounding the osteoporosis drug Fosamax involves serious, rare side effects like osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures, alongside lawsuits alleging manufacturer negligence in failing to warn patients.

Key Points

  • Risk of Rare Fractures: Long-term Fosamax use has been linked to atypical femur fractures, rare but serious breaks of the thigh bone.

  • Jawbone Deterioration: A severe side effect called osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) involves the death of jawbone tissue, often triggered by invasive dental procedures.

  • History of Lawsuits: Manufacturer Merck has faced thousands of lawsuits alleging failure to adequately warn patients and doctors about these significant risks.

  • FDA Warning Updates: Warnings for both ONJ and atypical femur fractures were added to the drug's label years after its initial approval, following rising reports and regulatory action.

  • Long-Term Use Concerns: The safety of continuous, long-term Fosamax therapy is debated, with some experts recommending 'drug holidays' to mitigate risks after several years of use.

In This Article

The purpose and mechanism of Fosamax

Fosamax, the brand name for the generic drug alendronate, is a bisphosphonate medication widely prescribed to treat and prevent osteoporosis in men and postmenopausal women. It is also used to treat Paget's disease. The medication works by inhibiting osteoclasts, the cells that break down old bone tissue. By slowing down this natural bone resorption process, Fosamax helps increase bone mineral density and reduce the risk of fractures. While this mechanism is effective in the short-term, questions have arisen about its long-term consequences and the potential for a buildup of old, brittle bone.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)

One of the most concerning rare side effects linked to Fosamax is osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), also known as "dead jaw syndrome". ONJ is a condition where bone tissue in the jaw dies due to a lack of blood supply, leaving the bone exposed in the mouth.

ONJ risk factors and symptoms

While ONJ can occur spontaneously, the risk is significantly higher following invasive dental procedures such as tooth extractions or dental implants. Other contributing risk factors include cancer therapy, poor oral hygiene, diabetes, and gum disease.

Common symptoms of ONJ include:

  • Jaw pain or numbness
  • Exposed bone in the mouth
  • Swelling or infection of the gums
  • Loose teeth

The legal history of ONJ claims

Thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Merck, the manufacturer of Fosamax, by patients who developed ONJ. Plaintiffs alleged that Merck failed to adequately warn patients and doctors about this severe risk. In 2013, Merck settled many of these ONJ-related lawsuits, though denying wrongdoing.

Atypical femur fractures (AFF)

Another rare but serious complication associated with long-term Fosamax use is atypical femur fractures (AFF). These are unusual, low-trauma fractures of the thigh bone that can occur with minimal stress. The theory is that by suppressing bone turnover for many years, bisphosphonates can cause bone to become overly mineralized and brittle, increasing the risk of these specific fractures.

AFF warning and lawsuits

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) first required a warning about thigh bone fractures on the Fosamax label in 2010, years after the drug had been on the market. This led to a new wave of lawsuits from patients who experienced these fractures. The litigation, which included complex arguments about federal preemption, has seen significant legal back-and-forth, with some cases moving forward while others were dismissed based on procedural rulings.

Comparing benefits and risks

Patients and doctors must weigh the benefits of Fosamax, which is effective at preventing more common fractures, against the rare but potentially devastating risks of ONJ and AFF. The following table compares the typical outcomes of treatment versus the controversial risks:

Aspect Typical Benefit Rare, Controversial Risk
Effect on Bone Increases bone mineral density, reducing fracture risk Makes bone brittle with long-term use, increasing risk of atypical femur fractures
Dental Procedures No direct impact in most cases High risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) following invasive procedures
Treatment Duration Effective in preventing fractures over several years Side effect risks increase with prolonged use (over 5 years)
Patient Experience Helps prevent debilitating fractures from osteoporosis Can cause severe jaw or thigh pain, leading to disability

The debate over long-term use and 'drug holidays'

Given the concerns about long-term use, particularly regarding AFF, some medical experts and guidelines now recommend a "drug holiday" for certain patients. This involves periodically stopping Fosamax after 3 to 5 years, especially for patients with a lower fracture risk. The optimal duration of bisphosphonate therapy is still a topic of discussion among healthcare providers. The benefits of fracture risk reduction may persist for years even after stopping the drug. Patients should always consult their physician before making any changes to their treatment plan.

Other side effects and patient precautions

Beyond the most severe complications, Fosamax is associated with other side effects, notably affecting the upper gastrointestinal tract. These include esophagitis (esophageal irritation), ulcers, and severe heartburn. To minimize these risks, patients must take the medication with a full glass of water, remain upright for at least 30 minutes, and not eat or drink anything else during that time. Severe musculoskeletal pain is another reported side effect, though it is usually milder and more common.

For more information on the FDA's regulatory actions and safety communications regarding bisphosphonates, including Fosamax, please visit the official FDA website: https://www.fda.gov.

Conclusion: Navigating the risks and benefits

The controversy with Fosamax underscores the importance of careful consideration and ongoing dialogue between patients and healthcare providers regarding long-term osteoporosis treatment. While the drug has proven benefits in reducing fracture risk, the potential for rare but serious side effects like ONJ and AFF necessitates a thorough understanding of all potential outcomes. As more data emerges, including recommendations for drug holidays, patients can make more informed decisions about the best course of action for their individual circumstances, always prioritizing open communication with their medical team.

Frequently Asked Questions

Invasive dental procedures, such as tooth extractions and dental implants, can increase the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in patients taking Fosamax. It is crucial to inform your dentist that you are taking this medication before any such procedures.

The optimal duration of Fosamax use is a key part of the controversy. Some guidelines suggest reassessing fracture risk after 3 to 5 years and considering a 'drug holiday' for those at lower risk, due to increasing concerns about atypical femur fractures with long-term use.

Symptoms of ONJ can include jaw pain, exposed bone in the mouth, loose teeth, or numbness in the jaw. Patients with these symptoms should seek medical attention immediately.

Yes, Fosamax can cause bone, joint, or muscle pain. In some cases, this pain can be severe. Any new or severe pain in the hip, groin, or thigh should be evaluated by a doctor, as it could signal an atypical femur fracture.

A 'drug holiday' is a temporary break from taking Fosamax, often after several years of therapy. It is intended to help reduce the risk of long-term side effects like atypical femur fractures.

Yes, Merck has faced thousands of lawsuits related to Fosamax, alleging that the company failed to adequately warn patients about the risks of ONJ and atypical femur fractures. There have been settlements for ONJ cases and significant legal battles over the femur fracture claims.

Other treatments for osteoporosis are available, including other bisphosphonates (like Actonel or Reclast), denosumab (Prolia), and bone-building medications such as teriparatide (Forteo). The best option depends on a patient's specific health profile.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.