Skip to content

What was Helen's main problem when she grew older?

4 min read

In 1961, at the age of 81, Helen Keller suffered a stroke, an event that marked her retirement from public life and brought about a new phase of physical decline. This health event revealed that a major problem Helen faced when she grew older was the increased vulnerability to illness and the profound loss of her trusted lifelong companions, which exacerbated her dependence on others.

Quick Summary

As Helen Keller aged, her primary challenges shifted from her initial fight for communication to navigating the physical vulnerabilities of old age and the profound loss of her dedicated caregivers. Following a debilitating stroke, she retired from public work, facing increased reliance on new companions. Societal constraints on people with disabilities and a need to maintain a public persona also created significant problems during her later years.

Key Points

  • Loss of Companions: The deaths of her lifelong companions and caregivers, Anne Sullivan and Polly Thomson, left Helen Keller vulnerable and increased her reliance on others in her later years.

  • Declining Health: Keller's aging was marked by a series of strokes beginning in 1961, which led to her retirement from public life and limited her physical abilities.

  • Maintaining Public Persona: As she grew older, Keller had to balance her radical socialist beliefs with the expectations of conservative philanthropists who funded her work, risking her reputation and livelihood.

  • Navigating Ableism: Throughout her life, and particularly as a high-profile adult, Keller faced lingering ableist attitudes and skepticism about her achievements.

  • Shift in Dependency: The later stages of her life illustrate a shift from overcoming communication barriers to navigating a new form of dependence, but without sacrificing her dignity or autonomy.

  • Transition from Icon to Activist: Her later years saw her transition from being viewed primarily as a 'miracle' figure to a dedicated and complex activist, with her public image often simplifying her true identity.

In This Article

The Loss of Lifelong Companions and Support System

Perhaps the most deeply felt problem for Helen Keller as she aged was the loss of her closest companions and caregivers, Anne Sullivan Macy and Polly Thomson. For nearly 50 years, Anne Sullivan was Keller's teacher and constant companion, acting as her guide, translator, and most intimate connection to the outside world. The deep, symbiotic relationship was fundamental to Keller's ability to communicate and function independently. After Anne's death in 1936, Keller's dependence shifted to Polly Thomson, who had joined their household decades earlier. Polly served as Keller's companion and secretary until her death in 1960. The deaths of these two women, particularly in her later years, left Keller profoundly vulnerable and reliant on a new team of caregivers to assist with daily life and communication, a stark and difficult contrast to the decades of stability she had known.

The Impact of Widowhood and Illness

In addition to the loss of her long-time companions, Keller experienced personal health crises that forced her to withdraw from public life. After Polly Thomson's death in 1960, Keller suffered a series of strokes beginning in 1961, which led her to retire completely from her public work. These strokes limited her physical abilities and curtailed her extensive international travel and lecture tours. For a woman who was globally recognized and derived much purpose from her activism, this forced retirement was a significant and difficult transition. The combination of losing her primary support system and facing her own physical fragility was a central struggle of her advanced age.

Navigating Societal and Political Constraints

Throughout her life, Helen Keller actively engaged in politics and social causes, often holding views that were considered radical for her time. In her later years, her continued advocacy required her to carefully balance her public persona with her personal beliefs and financial realities. The need to maintain funding for the organizations she supported, like the American Foundation for the Blind (AFB), and to manage her public image sometimes put her in a precarious position. A 2004 book titled The Radical Lives of Helen Keller discusses how she navigated this delicate balance, suggesting her public life was marked by constant bargaining and compromise.

  • Reliance on Philanthropists: Keller depended on funding from philanthropists, some of whom held conservative political views that contrasted with her socialist and left-wing politics. This created a tension between her need for financial support and her personal convictions.
  • Risk of Reputational Damage: Every time she publicly supported a controversial cause or failed to conform to the public's idealized image of her, she risked losing support, reputation, and livelihood. This constant pressure was a subtle but significant problem throughout her public life.
  • The Problem of the 'Infantilized Icon': A modern perspective suggests that the public's perception of Keller as a miraculous, childlike figure was a form of infantilization, which many disabled adults continue to face. In her later years, Keller had to contend with a world that often saw her as a symbol rather than a complex, autonomous adult with her own life and beliefs.

The Lingering Problem of Ableism

Even with her worldwide fame, Keller's later life was not free from ableist attitudes. The constant need to prove her abilities and justify her accomplishments persisted. Conspiracy theories, often circulating online today but rooted in historical ableism, have questioned her achievements. The underlying societal prejudice against people with disabilities meant that her independence was always under scrutiny, an ever-present problem she and her team had to manage.

Comparison of Helen Keller's Early and Later Life Problems

Aspect Early Life (Childhood to Young Adulthood) Later Life (Middle Age to Old Age)
Main Challenge Breaking through communication barriers and isolation due to congenital deaf-blindness. Managing the physical decline of old age, losing close companions, and navigating public image.
Key Support System The arrival of Anne Sullivan, whose teaching unlocked communication and education. Reliance on a new, more expansive support team and the loss of her most intimate companions.
Advocacy Focus Primarily focused on establishing herself as an educated, capable individual against the low expectations of society. Focused on broader social and political issues, such as disability rights and women's suffrage.
Personal Independence Achieved new levels of independence through communication and education, though still highly reliant on her companion. The strokes in her later years limited her independence and mobility, forcing her to retire from public engagements.
Societal View Seen as a 'miracle worker' and a symbol of triumph over adversity. Viewed as an infantilized icon, with her radical politics often downplayed or ignored by the mainstream.

A Concluding Perspective on Keller's Later Years

Helen Keller's advanced age presented a complex array of problems that were distinct from her famous childhood struggles. While her younger years were defined by the remarkable achievement of learning to communicate despite her disabilities, her older years were marked by the profound vulnerabilities of aging: the loss of loved ones, declining health, and the difficult task of maintaining her legacy and independence in the face of societal expectations. The constant pressure of public life, coupled with the loss of her core companions, meant that even in her retirement, Helen was never truly free from the challenges that defined her life. Her later years emphasize that functional limitations and dependency are not necessarily a defeat, but rather a shift in strategy and a different expression of interdependence. She ultimately aged with dignity, remaining an inspiration for her resilience long after her active career ended. The challenges of her older years underscore her humanity and the deep emotional and physical tolls that came with her extraordinary life.

Helen Keller Archive - American Foundation for the Blind

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, in her older years, Helen Keller suffered a series of strokes, the first of which occurred in 1961. This event was a major turning point that prompted her to retire from public appearances and active advocacy.

The death of her beloved teacher and companion, Anne Sullivan, in 1936, deeply affected Helen Keller. It shifted her primary caregiving and interpretive relationship to Polly Thomson, highlighting Keller's increasing vulnerability as her core support system changed.

Polly Thomson, who became Keller's primary companion after Anne Sullivan's death, suffered a stroke in 1957 and passed away in 1960. Her death was another profound loss for Keller, who relied on her heavily.

Yes, Keller's political beliefs, particularly her socialist views, created tension. She had to carefully navigate her public advocacy and her relationship with conservative benefactors who funded her work, risking her reputation each time she took a controversial stance.

Helen Keller retired from public speaking and appearances following a major stroke in 1961. This health event significantly impacted her physical capabilities and marked the end of her extensive career as a global advocate.

A significant misunderstanding is the tendency to 'infantilize' her, viewing her only as the 'miracle worker' figure from her youth. In reality, her later life was defined by complex challenges of aging, loss, and navigating the nuances of public life while maintaining her dignity and autonomy.

Even after suffering strokes and retiring from public life, Keller continued to inspire others. Her focus shifted to adapting to her new circumstances, and she demonstrated a different form of independence by relying on others with dignity.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.