Skip to content

How do you assess falls risk in the elderly? A comprehensive guide

4 min read

According to the CDC, over one in four adults aged 65 and older falls each year, but fewer than half report it to their doctor. To protect against these incidents, it is critical to understand how do you assess falls risk in the elderly through validated tools and a multifactorial evaluation.

Quick Summary

Assessing fall risk in older adults involves a multifactorial approach that includes screening for history of falls, balance and gait tests, medication review, and home safety evaluations. Standardized tools like the Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale, and Morse Fall Scale help quantify risk.

Key Points

  • Multifactorial approach: Falls assessment considers multiple factors, including intrinsic patient conditions and extrinsic environmental hazards, for a comprehensive risk profile.

  • CDC STEADI Initiative: The CDC's strategy provides a clear framework for healthcare professionals, focusing on three core elements: screen, assess, and intervene.

  • Physical performance tests: Standardized tests like the Timed Up and Go (TUG), 30-Second Chair Stand, and 4-Stage Balance Test are used to evaluate strength, balance, and mobility.

  • Medication review is vital: A review of all medications, especially psychoactive drugs, is essential, as polypharmacy increases fall risk.

  • Address environmental hazards: Modifying the home environment to eliminate tripping hazards, improve lighting, and install grab bars significantly reduces risk.

  • Fear of falling increases risk: Addressing a patient's fear of falling is important, as it can lead to reduced physical activity and increased weakness over time.

In This Article

The Importance of a Multifactorial Fall Risk Assessment

Falls are not an inevitable part of aging; they are often preventable and are typically caused by a combination of factors rather than a single issue. A comprehensive, multifactorial assessment is the gold standard for identifying at-risk individuals because it considers a wide range of intrinsic (patient-related) and extrinsic (environmental) risk factors. This holistic approach, endorsed by organizations like the American Geriatrics Society and the British Geriatrics Society, forms the basis for effective and personalized prevention strategies. A detailed assessment helps healthcare providers pinpoint modifiable risks and recommend targeted interventions, from physical therapy to home modifications.

Key Components of a Fall Risk Assessment

An effective evaluation should incorporate several elements to build a complete picture of an individual's fall risk. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) initiative, which provides a structured approach for healthcare providers that includes three core elements: screen, assess, and intervene.

Screening and patient history

The initial screening involves simple questions to identify patients who require further, more in-depth assessment. This typically includes:

  • Asking about previous falls: Have you fallen in the past year? A history of falling is one of the strongest predictors of future falls.
  • Assessing unsteadiness: Do you feel unsteady when standing or walking?
  • Addressing fear of falling: Are you worried about falling? Fear can lead to reduced activity, which can weaken muscles and increase risk.

Standardized physical and functional tests

For those who screen positive, a more detailed physical assessment is required. Several validated tools exist to test strength, balance, and gait.

  • Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test: This simple, quick test measures the time it takes for a person to stand from a chair, walk 10 feet, turn, walk back, and sit down. A time of 12 seconds or more suggests a higher risk of falling.
  • 30-Second Chair Stand Test: Assesses lower body strength by counting how many times an individual can stand up from a chair and sit down in 30 seconds. A score below the average for a person's age group indicates increased risk.
  • 4-Stage Balance Test: Evaluates static balance by having a person stand in four progressively more challenging positions for 10 seconds each. An inability to hold the most difficult stances predicts a higher risk.
  • Berg Balance Scale (BBS): A 14-item scale that measures both static and dynamic balance through tasks like standing unaided and reaching forward. It is a reliable tool, though some research indicates it may have a ceiling effect for high-functioning individuals.
  • Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA): A task-oriented test that evaluates gait and balance with a total possible score of 28. Scores below 19 suggest a high risk of falling.

Medication and medical condition review

A critical aspect of the assessment is a thorough review of the patient's medications. Polypharmacy, or taking more than four medications, significantly increases fall risk. Psychoactive drugs, such as sedatives, antidepressants, and antipsychotics, are particularly problematic due to side effects like dizziness and confusion. A healthcare provider should also check for conditions that affect balance, such as postural hypotension (a drop in blood pressure upon standing), impaired vision, foot problems, and chronic diseases like diabetes and arthritis.

Environmental and lifestyle assessment

An occupational therapist can perform a home safety evaluation to identify and modify hazards. This includes checking for tripping hazards like rugs, poor lighting, lack of grab bars in bathrooms, and uneven flooring. Lifestyle factors, such as wearing unsafe footwear, using improper walking aids, or having a sedentary lifestyle that leads to muscle weakness (sarcopenia), also need to be addressed.

Comparison of Fall Risk Assessment Tools

Different tools are suited for different clinical settings, from hospitals to primary care. Here is a comparison of some common options:

Feature Timed Up and Go (TUG) Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) Morse Fall Scale (MFS)
Best for Quick screening in primary care settings Detailed gait and balance evaluation Acute care/in-hospital settings
Time Required Very quick (a few minutes) Approximately 20 minutes Quick and easy (less than 3 minutes)
Scoring Time-based (e.g., ≥12 seconds indicates high risk) Point-based (max 28); lower score indicates higher risk Point-based (max 125); higher score indicates higher risk
Evaluates Functional mobility, including chair transfer and turning Both gait and static/dynamic balance Fall history, secondary diagnosis, ambulatory aid, gait, mental status, IV therapy
Key advantage Simple, fast, and requires minimal equipment Comprehensive, reliable assessment of gait and balance Provides a rapid, easy-to-use score based on multiple risk factors
Limitations May not identify subtler balance deficits May have a ceiling effect for high-functioning individuals Focuses heavily on inpatient-specific risks like IVs

Conclusion: A Proactive Approach to Prevention

Assessing falls risk in the elderly is a critical step toward proactive, preventative care. By combining systematic screening with validated physical tests and a thorough review of medical, medication, and environmental factors, healthcare providers can build a complete risk profile. Acknowledging that falls are multifactorial events allows for personalized interventions that reduce risk and empower older adults to maintain their independence and quality of life. The CDC's STEADI initiative offers an excellent framework for implementing these strategies in clinical practice, emphasizing regular re-evaluation and targeted interventions for at-risk individuals. Implementing effective strategies is not just about preventing injury, but about promoting confidence and long-term well-being.

Get more insights with our free guide

For an in-depth look at implementing fall prevention in your practice or home, download the CDC's STEADI toolkit. This resource provides printable guides, patient education materials, and detailed information on the tools and strategies used by healthcare professionals. It is an authoritative and invaluable resource for anyone involved in elderly care.

Frequently Asked Questions

The initial screening involves asking simple questions during a routine check-up. These include whether the person has fallen in the past year, feels unsteady, or has a fear of falling. If the answer to any of these is yes, a more in-depth assessment is warranted.

The TUG test measures how long it takes a person to stand up from a chair, walk 10 feet, turn around, walk back, and sit down again. A time of 12 seconds or more is generally considered an indicator of increased fall risk.

Medical conditions that increase fall risk include Parkinson's disease, dementia, diabetes, arthritis, and cardiovascular disease. Vision and hearing impairments also significantly contribute to a person's risk.

Certain medications, especially psychoactive drugs like sedatives, antidepressants, and tranquilizers, can cause side effects such as dizziness, drowsiness, and confusion, increasing the likelihood of a fall. The risk increases with the number of medications taken.

An environmental assessment, often conducted by an occupational therapist, identifies hazards in the home. It focuses on removing tripping hazards, improving lighting, and installing assistive devices like handrails and grab bars to make the space safer.

Regular exercise programs focusing on balance, strength, and gait training can significantly reduce fall risk. Activities like Tai Chi and the Otago Exercise Program are evidence-based interventions for improving stability and strength.

Yes, a significant fear of falling can lead to a cycle of reduced physical activity, muscle weakness, and social isolation, which ultimately increases the actual risk of falling and negatively impacts quality of life.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.