Skip to content

How to calculate Falls Efficacy Scale scores (FES-I, Short FES-I, and MFES)

4 min read

According to one study, higher scores on the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) are significantly correlated with greater self-reported concerns about falling among older adults. To calculate falls efficacy scale scores accurately, you must first identify which version of the scale is being used, as calculation methods and scoring ranges vary significantly between them. This guide provides detailed instructions for scoring the most common versions of the FES.

Quick Summary

Guide to calculating and interpreting scores for the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), Short FES-I, and Modified FES (MFES). This resource explains the scoring method for each version, how to handle missing data, and what the final score indicates about a person's falls-related self-efficacy.

Key Points

  • Identify the Correct Scale: The scoring method depends on which version was used (e.g., FES-I, Short FES-I, or MFES).

  • FES-I Calculation: Add the ratings for all 16 items. Scores range from 16 to 64, with higher scores indicating more concern about falling.

  • Short FES-I Calculation: Sum the ratings for the 7 items. Scores range from 7 to 28, and higher scores indicate more concern.

  • MFES Calculation: Find the average of the 14 item scores. Scores range from 0 to 10, and higher scores mean more confidence.

  • Handling Missing Data: If some items are incomplete, use a specific formula to calculate the prorated score for the FES-I and Short FES-I.

  • Interpretation Matters: Interpret the score based on the specific scale's range. For example, a high score on the FES-I means high concern, whereas a high score on the MFES means high confidence.

In This Article

The Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) is a crucial tool in geriatric and rehabilitative medicine used to assess an individual's confidence in performing daily activities without falling. Calculating the score correctly depends entirely on which specific version of the questionnaire has been administered. The most common versions are the FES-International (FES-I), the Short FES-I, and the Modified FES (MFES). Each has a unique scoring protocol that determines the level of concern or confidence regarding falls.

How to calculate the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) score

The FES-I is a 16-item questionnaire used to measure concern about falling during a variety of social and physical activities, both inside and outside the home. It is widely used and available in multiple languages.

Scoring for complete FES-I questionnaires

To calculate the score for a completed FES-I questionnaire, follow these simple steps:

  • Assign points: Each of the 16 items is rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The point values are assigned as follows:
    • 1 = Not at all concerned
    • 2 = Somewhat concerned
    • 3 = Fairly concerned
    • 4 = Very concerned
  • Sum the scores: Add the score from each of the 16 items together to get a total score. The final score will range from 16 to 64.

Handling missing FES-I data

If a respondent leaves some items blank, the scoring method must be adjusted.

  • Invalidate if too many missing: If more than four items are left blank, the questionnaire is considered invalid and a score cannot be calculated.
  • Calculate score with remaining data: If four or fewer items are missing, follow these steps:
    1. Add the scores for the items that were completed.
    2. Divide this sum by the number of items completed.
    3. Multiply the result by 16 (the total number of items on the scale).
    4. Round the final figure up to the nearest whole number to get the total score.

Interpreting FES-I scores

High scores on the FES-I indicate a greater concern or fear of falling. The cutoff scores for different levels of concern are generally categorized as follows:

  • Low concern: 16–19
  • Moderate concern: 20–27
  • High concern: 28–64

Calculating the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (Short FES-I)

The Short FES-I is a more concise, 7-item version of the FES-I designed for practical, quicker assessment.

Scoring for complete Short FES-I questionnaires

  • Assign points: Similar to the full version, each of the seven items uses a 4-point Likert scale:
    • 1 = Not at all concerned
    • 2 = Somewhat concerned
    • 3 = Fairly concerned
    • 4 = Very concerned
  • Sum the scores: Add the scores from all seven items. The total will range from 7 to 28.

Handling missing Short FES-I data

  • Invalidate if too many missing: If more than two items are missing, the questionnaire is invalid.
  • Calculate score with remaining data: If two or fewer items are missing:
    1. Add the scores of the items that were completed.
    2. Divide this sum by the number of items completed.
    3. Multiply the result by 7 (the total number of items).
    4. Round the final figure up to the nearest whole number to get the total score.

Interpreting Short FES-I scores

  • Low concern: 7–8
  • Moderate concern: 9–13
  • High concern: 14–28

Calculating the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES) score

The MFES is a 14-item scale that expands upon the original 10-item FES by adding outdoor activities. It uses a different scoring system to the FES-I versions.

Scoring the MFES

  • Assign points: Each item is rated on a 10-point visual analogue scale:
    • 0 = Not confident/not sure at all
    • 10 = Completely confident/completely sure
  • Average the scores: The final score is the average of all 14 item scores, with the total score ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores on the MFES reflect greater confidence and less fear of falling.

Interpreting MFES scores

  • An average score below 8.0 may indicate reduced fall-related self-efficacy.
  • An average score below 5.0 may be a predictor of in-hospital falls and longer hospital stays.

Comparison of FES versions and scoring

Aspect FES-International (FES-I) Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (Short FES-I) Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES)
Number of Items 16 7 14
Rating Scale 4-point Likert scale (1-4) 4-point Likert scale (1-4) 10-point visual analog scale (0-10)
Total Score Range 16–64 7–28 0–10 (average score)
Scoring Method Sum of all item scores Sum of all item scores Average of all item scores
Missing Data Rule Invalid if >4 items missing. Can impute if ≤4. Invalid if >2 items missing. Can impute if ≤2. Scoring is based on average, so can accommodate some missing data by averaging the completed items.
Interpretation Higher scores mean greater concern. Higher scores mean greater concern. Higher scores mean greater confidence.

Conclusion

Calculating a Falls Efficacy Scale score is a straightforward process of adding up item ratings, but it is critical to use the correct method for the specific scale administered. The FES-I and Short FES-I scales measure concern about falling and are scored by summing points on a 4-point scale, with higher totals indicating greater concern. The MFES measures confidence and requires averaging ratings from a 10-point scale, with lower scores reflecting reduced confidence. Understanding the nuances of each version's scoring and interpretation is key to accurately assessing a person's falls-related self-efficacy and informing clinical decisions for fall prevention.

Authoritative link

Frequently Asked Questions

The key difference is that the FES-I measures a person's concern about falling, with higher scores indicating greater concern. In contrast, the MFES measures a person's confidence, with higher scores indicating greater confidence and less fear of falling.

If four or fewer items are missing on a 16-item FES-I, you can calculate a prorated score. You must sum the completed items, divide by the number of items completed, and then multiply by 16. If more than four items are missing, the questionnaire is invalid.

A score on the FES-I ranging from 28 to 64 is considered high concern about falls. A lower score, from 16 to 19, indicates low concern.

The scores for the seven items on the Short FES-I are simply added together. Each item is rated on a scale of 1 to 4, making the total score range from 7 to 28.

An average MFES score of 6.2 indicates reduced fall-related self-efficacy, particularly in higher-risk scenarios. Clinicians often recommend interventions for scores below 8.0.

Yes, research shows that falls efficacy scales have predictive validity for the risk of future falls, particularly in the frail elderly. Higher scores on the FES-I, which indicate greater concern, are correlated with higher falls risk.

Different versions of the FES were developed to address specific needs. The FES-I includes more challenging and social activities, while the shorter version (Short FES-I) is quicker to administer. The Modified FES (MFES) uses a different confidence-based scoring system.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.