Skip to content

What was life expectancy for most of human history?

4 min read

For most of human history, life expectancy at birth was astonishingly low, typically hovering between 25 and 40 years. This low figure paints a stark picture of past realities and begs the question: What was life expectancy for most of human history and why was it so short?

Quick Summary

Throughout human history, average life expectancy was very low, typically in the 20s and 30s. This was primarily a result of extremely high infant and child mortality rates, with most adults who survived childhood living much longer.

Key Points

  • Misleading Averages: Historical life expectancy figures are skewed by high rates of infant and child mortality, not universal early death.

  • Infant Mortality's Role: Throughout history, a large proportion of children died before reaching adulthood, drastically lowering the statistical average.

  • Adult Longevity: Those who survived childhood often lived much longer than the average, with many reaching their 50s, 60s, or older, even in ancient times.

  • Industrial Revolution's Impact: The most significant increase in human longevity occurred after the mid-19th century, driven by advances in public health and medicine.

  • Factors for Change: Improvements in sanitation, nutrition, vaccinations, and antibiotics are the primary reasons for today's long and healthy lifespans.

In This Article

A Misleading Average: Understanding the Numbers

The most commonly cited statistics for historical life expectancy can be highly misleading. The reason for these low averages was not that most people died in their 30s; rather, it was the staggering rates of infant and child mortality. In many historical societies, it was common for a quarter to half of all infants to die before their first birthday or before reaching adulthood due to disease, malnutrition, and a lack of sanitation. When these deaths are averaged with the lives of those who lived much longer, the overall average is pulled down significantly. People who survived past childhood often had a reasonable chance of living well into their 50s, 60s, and beyond.

Life Expectancy Across Different Eras

To truly understand the progression of human longevity, it's helpful to look at different historical periods and the unique challenges faced by each.

Prehistoric and Ancient Times

In the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras, life expectancy estimates place the average around 20 to 33 years. Factors included:

  • Exposure to predators and dangers in a hunter-gatherer existence.
  • High rates of infection from untreated injuries and rudimentary living conditions.
  • Food scarcity leading to frequent periods of famine and malnutrition.

Moving into ancient civilizations like Rome, life expectancy at birth remained in the low 20s to mid-30s. While cities offered some advances, they also brought new health risks:

  • Crowded, unsanitary living conditions facilitated the spread of infectious diseases.
  • Frequent warfare and violence shortened many lives.
  • Lack of advanced medical knowledge and treatments meant simple infections were often fatal.

The Middle Ages and Early Modern Period

For much of the medieval period, life expectancy stagnated, hovering around 30 to 35 years. This era saw the continued dominance of poor public sanitation and hygiene, but also faced new threats.

  • Pandemics like the Bubonic Plague in the 14th century caused dramatic drops in average lifespan.
  • Famine and nutritional deficiencies were widespread due to unpredictable agricultural yields.
  • Childbirth remained a major killer for women, further contributing to a lower overall average.

The Great Divergence: Modern Longevity Takes Hold

The most significant and sustained increase in life expectancy in human history began with the Industrial Revolution around the mid-19th century. In the span of just 200 years, global life expectancy has more than doubled, reaching over 70 years today. This was not due to a single breakthrough, but a combination of powerful forces.

Drivers of Modern Longevity:

  • Public Health and Sanitation: The implementation of public health measures, such as clean water systems, sewers, and waste disposal, drastically reduced the spread of waterborne diseases like cholera and typhoid.
  • Medical Advancements: The development of vaccines (starting with smallpox in 1796) and the later discovery of antibiotics in the 20th century transformed the ability to fight infectious diseases.
  • Improved Nutrition: Advances in agriculture and transportation led to better food security and access to a more varied diet, reducing malnutrition.
  • Better Living Conditions: Improved housing, working conditions, and reduced poverty in many regions contributed to overall better health and well-being.

Historical Life Expectancy: A Comparative Table

Era Estimated Life Expectancy (at Birth) Primary Factors Contributing to Low Lifespan
Prehistoric (Paleolithic) 22–33 years Infant mortality, accidents, disease, predators
Ancient Rome 20–33 years High infant mortality, disease in crowded cities, poor sanitation
Late Middle Ages 30–33 years Infant death, disease, plague, famine, warfare
Early 19th Century 29–40 years Infant mortality, infectious diseases, poor urban sanitation
Today 70+ years Modern medicine, sanitation, nutrition, public health

Beyond Statistics: What Longevity Meant Historically

While the average life expectancy tells a story of societal health, it doesn't fully capture the lived experience of individuals. The life of a person who survived childhood and avoided fatal accidents or infections was quite different. For instance, in 18th-century American colonies, a person who reached age 50 could expect to live until 71. This illustrates a key point: achieving old age was always possible, but the path was far more perilous and dependent on luck than it is today. Our modern conception of a long, healthy life was once the exception, not the rule.

To dive deeper into the data and see interactive visualizations, explore the resources available at Our World in Data.

Conclusion: The Modern Triumph Over Mortality

The dramatic increase in life expectancy over the past two centuries is a testament to human innovation and societal progress. The shift from a life dictated by the whims of nature and disease to one where long and healthy lives are the norm is one of humanity's greatest achievements. This transformation, driven by public health, medicine, and better living standards, fundamentally reshaped what it means to age, creating an era where senior care is a crucial aspect of life rather than a historical anomaly.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, it's a common misconception. While historical life expectancy at birth was low (often 25-40 years), this was due to very high rates of infant and child mortality. People who survived to adulthood had a much greater chance of living to a much older age, often into their 50s, 60s, or 70s.

In ancient Rome, life expectancy at birth is estimated to have been between 20 and 33 years. This was largely due to high infant mortality and rampant disease in crowded urban areas. However, for those who survived to adulthood, the average remaining years of life was significantly higher.

The Industrial Revolution marked a turning point. From the mid-19th century onwards, life expectancy began a rapid and sustained increase. This was fueled by major improvements in sanitation, public health, nutrition, and medical science, which dramatically reduced child and infectious disease mortality.

Disparities in modern life expectancy are often linked to access to healthcare, sanitation, clean water, and nutrition. Poverty and geopolitical instability also play a role. These factors mirror some of the challenges faced by pre-industrial societies on a global scale.

Globally, average life expectancy has steadily increased over the last few decades, though the rate of increase has slowed in some developed countries. While pandemics like COVID-19 have caused temporary dips, the long-term trend remains upward due to ongoing advancements in medicine and healthcare.

No, the human aging process has not fundamentally changed. The difference in life expectancy is not due to a 'faster' aging process in the past, but rather a higher probability of death at any given age due to external factors like disease, injury, and childbirth. Those who overcame these obstacles could still live to an advanced age.

Scientists estimate life expectancy for prehistoric periods by analyzing fossilized remains, such as the proportion of individuals who died at younger vs. older ages, and by studying modern-day hunter-gatherer populations. These methods provide statistical snapshots of mortality patterns.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.