Skip to content

What are the results of the timed up and go test?

4 min read

According to the CDC, older adults who take 12 seconds or more to complete the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test are at a higher risk of falling. The authoritative results of the timed up and go test provide a simple and reliable measure of an individual's functional mobility, gait, and balance.

Quick Summary

Timed Up and Go (TUG) test results are a snapshot of a person's functional mobility, where the time taken to complete the task is used to categorize their mobility and assess potential fall risk, with shorter times indicating better mobility and longer times signifying increased risk or limitation.

Key Points

  • Score Interpretation: A TUG test result is the time in seconds, with shorter times (≤ 10-12s) indicating normal mobility and longer times (≥ 14s) suggesting increased fall risk.

  • Assesses Key Movements: The test evaluates dynamic balance and functional mobility by timing the transitions from sitting to standing, walking, turning, and sitting again.

  • Not a Standalone Predictor: While a TUG score can identify high-risk individuals, it has limitations in predicting future falls and should be used alongside other assessments for a comprehensive evaluation.

  • Tool for Tracking Progress: It's a reliable measure for monitoring changes in a patient's mobility, allowing clinicians to track the effectiveness of interventions over time.

  • Clinical Observation is Key: Beyond the time score, clinicians observe qualitative elements like gait, stability, and pace, which offer additional clues about a person's mobility and health status.

  • Holistic Assessment is Best: Due to the multifactorial nature of fall risk, the TUG is most useful as part of a broader evaluation that considers a person's overall health and functional abilities.

In This Article

Understanding the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test

The Timed Up and Go test is a widely used and validated clinical assessment for measuring a person's functional mobility, balance, and gait speed. It is particularly valuable in geriatric care, as it simulates the everyday movements involved in rising from a chair, walking, turning, and sitting down again. A key benefit of the TUG is its simplicity; it requires minimal equipment—just a standard armchair and a stopwatch—and can be performed in a variety of clinical and home settings. However, it is a timed test, and the interpretation hinges on a clear understanding of the scoring system and the context of the individual being assessed.

The Procedure: What to Expect

For an accurate TUG assessment, the procedure is standardized to ensure reliable and consistent results. Here is a typical breakdown of the process:

  1. Starting Position: The individual begins seated in a standard, armless chair, with their back against the chair's backrest and feet flat on the floor.
  2. The Course: A marker or line is placed on the floor exactly 3 meters (10 feet) away from the chair.
  3. The Task: On the verbal cue “Go”, the individual stands up from the chair, walks to the marker at their normal pace, turns around, walks back to the chair, and sits down again.
  4. Timing: The clock starts on the cue “Go” and stops the moment the individual is fully seated back in the chair.
  5. Use of Aids: The person is allowed to use any assistive walking device, such as a cane or walker, that they normally use.
  6. Practice Run: A practice trial is often administered first to help the person understand the instructions before the timed test begins.

Interpreting Your TUG Test Score

The most important aspect of the TUG test is how the results are interpreted based on the time it takes to complete the task. While benchmarks exist, these are not rigid thresholds and should be considered alongside other clinical information.

Time (seconds) Interpretation
≤ 10 Considered normal mobility for healthy, community-dwelling older adults under 80.
≤ 12 Normal mobility for most older adults. A time over this may suggest a need for further assessment.
> 13.5 Indicates a higher risk of falling, especially for community-dwelling elderly.
≤ 20 Indicates good mobility, suggesting independence in basic mobility, including outdoors.
20–29 Suggests mobility limitations, with possible balance and gait problems. The person may need assistance with certain activities or environments.
≥ 30 Signifies significant mobility impairment and a high risk of falling. These individuals are often dependent on others for many activities.

Clinical Significance and Application

Beyond just the raw score, the TUG test offers valuable clinical insights. Physical therapists and physicians use the test to:

  • Screen for Fall Risk: While not the sole predictor, a TUG score above 13.5 seconds reliably identifies individuals at a higher risk of falls. This helps prioritize interventions and preventive care.
  • Monitor Progress: The test is a highly reliable tool for tracking changes in a person's functional mobility over time, such as during or after rehabilitation. An improved score, even if still outside the 'normal' range, can demonstrate meaningful functional gains.
  • Guide Intervention: The score helps clinicians identify specific areas for intervention, whether it's focusing on balance, gait speed, or the strength required for sit-to-stand transitions.
  • Qualitative Assessment: The test provides an opportunity to observe the person's gait patterns, balance during turns, and any hesitancy or difficulty, which can reveal underlying issues not captured by time alone.

Limitations and Holistic Assessment

While the TUG is a powerful tool, it's crucial to understand its limitations. It should never be used in isolation for determining fall risk or prescribing assistive devices. The risk of falling is multifactorial and influenced by a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic factors not captured by a single test. These factors can include medication side effects, fluctuations in blood pressure, cognitive function, and environmental hazards. For this reason, the TUG test is most effective when combined with other assessments, such as strength tests, balance scales, and a comprehensive review of medical history. For example, a TUG test might be paired with the Five Times Sit to Stand (FSST) test to better assess lower-extremity strength and endurance.

Beyond the TUG: Comprehensive Risk Assessment

A healthcare provider will use a variety of tools to create a complete mobility profile. Some complementary assessments include:

  • Berg Balance Test: Assesses static and dynamic balance through multiple tasks, identifying balance-specific deficits.
  • Functional Gait Assessment: Evaluates gait under varying conditions, such as turning the head or navigating obstacles.
  • 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test: Measures lower-extremity strength and endurance, providing insight into functional transfers.
  • Gait Speed Test (10-Meter Walk): Offers a simple, validated measure of walking speed, which correlates strongly with independence and fall risk.

Conclusion: More Than Just a Number

Ultimately, what are the results of the timed up and go test is an answer that goes beyond a single number. While the final score provides a reliable benchmark for functional mobility and can indicate a potential fall risk, its true value lies in how it is used as part of a broader, personalized health assessment. The TUG is an efficient screening tool that can effectively 'rule in' a high risk of falling, triggering further evaluation and intervention. However, it should not be the sole basis for clinical decisions. The most effective approach involves a holistic view of the individual, combining the TUG with other functional and self-reported measures, to create a safer and more independent life.

For more information on fall prevention strategies and resources, consider visiting the official Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website.

Frequently Asked Questions

The TUG test is a standard clinical assessment that measures a person's functional mobility by timing how long it takes to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters (10 feet), turn, walk back, and sit down again.

For healthy, community-dwelling older adults, a normal time is typically 10 to 12 seconds or less. A time of 12 seconds or more may indicate a higher risk of falling, according to the CDC.

A time of 14 seconds or more is generally considered a benchmark for an increased probability of fall risk. The exact cut-off can vary slightly, but it suggests mobility limitations requiring attention.

Studies have shown that the TUG test has limited ability to accurately predict future falls when used in isolation. However, it is highly specific at 'ruling in' those at high risk (if the score is poor) and is an excellent tool for screening and monitoring mobility.

While general benchmarks apply, what is considered 'normal' can shift with age. For instance, some research suggests a slightly different scoring curve for very old populations (e.g., 90+). A healthcare provider will consider age and other factors when interpreting the results.

Yes, individuals should use any assistive device, such as a cane or walker, that they normally use for walking. The test is designed to assess functional mobility under realistic, everyday conditions.

To get a more complete picture of a person's mobility and fall risk, other tests are often used in conjunction with the TUG. These include the Berg Balance Test, the Functional Gait Assessment, and the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand test.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.