Skip to content

Which test is used to evaluate overall postural control of the elderly?

4 min read

Falls are the leading cause of accidental death in adults aged 65 and older. To combat this, a comprehensive balance assessment is crucial for early detection of postural control deterioration. But which test is used to evaluate overall postural control of the elderly? The answer often involves using a combination of standardized clinical tests like the Berg Balance Scale and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, rather than a single definitive one.

Quick Summary

Several standardized tests are used to evaluate postural control in seniors, including the Berg Balance Scale and the Timed Up and Go test. These assessments evaluate both static and dynamic balance to gauge functional mobility and identify fall risk factors.

Key Points

  • No Single Best Test: A battery of tests is used because no one test can evaluate all aspects of overall postural control in the elderly.

  • Berg Balance Scale (BBS): This test evaluates static and dynamic functional balance and is highly reliable for assessing fall risk in ambulatory seniors.

  • Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test: The TUG is a quick screening tool for mobility and balance, with longer times indicating a higher risk of falls.

  • Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA): Also known as the Tinetti Test, it provides a comprehensive score for both balance and gait.

  • 4-Stage Balance Test: This simple, low-tech test assesses static balance through progressively challenging standing positions.

  • Advanced Posturography: For detailed analysis, instruments like force plates and Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP) can provide objective, quantitative measures of sway and sensory integration.

  • Assessing Sensory Input: Some tests, like CDP and the Romberg test, can isolate how well an individual uses visual, proprioceptive, and vestibular inputs for balance.

In This Article

Why Multiple Tests are Necessary for Assessment

Assessing overall postural control in the elderly is a complex process that relies on evaluating multiple body systems, including sensory functions (vision, proprioception), motor control, and musculoskeletal strength. No single test can provide a complete picture of an individual's balance capabilities. For this reason, healthcare professionals use a battery of tests to evaluate different aspects of balance and identify specific deficits that may contribute to falls. By combining static and dynamic assessments, clinicians can better understand a person's ability to maintain stability during a variety of functional tasks.

Common Clinical Balance Assessments

Several performance-based tests are widely used in clinical settings due to their reliability, low cost, and ease of administration. These tests offer a standardized way to quantify balance deficits and track changes over time.

The Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

The Berg Balance Scale is a highly reliable clinical tool that assesses functional balance in ambulatory older adults.

  • Methodology: The BBS consists of 14 tasks scored on a 0–4 scale, with a maximum score of 56. Tasks include rising from a chair, standing unsupported, reaching, and standing on one foot.
  • Interpretation: Scores are often used to categorize a person's fall risk. A score below 45 is associated with a greater fall risk, with scores below 36 indicating a very high risk.

Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test

The TUG test is a quick and simple screen for balance problems and functional mobility, often used with frail or at-risk individuals.

  • Methodology: The individual is timed as they stand from a chair, walk 3 meters (about 10 feet), turn around, walk back, and sit down again.
  • Interpretation: For older adults, completing the task in less than 10 seconds is considered normal. Taking 14 seconds or more indicates a high risk for falls.

Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) - Tinetti Test

The POMA, or Tinetti Test, evaluates both balance and gait to identify fall risk.

  • Methodology: It has two sections. The balance section assesses seated and standing balance, transfers, and balance with eyes closed. The gait section evaluates walking factors like step length, symmetry, and path deviation.
  • Interpretation: The maximum score is 28. A score between 19 and 24 indicates fall risk, while a score below 19 indicates a high fall risk.

The 4-Stage Balance Test

This simple, low-tech test assesses static balance using a stopwatch.

  • Methodology: The individual attempts to hold four progressively challenging standing positions for 10 seconds each: feet side-by-side, heel-to-instep, tandem stance (heel-to-toe), and single-leg stand.
  • Interpretation: The test concludes when the individual cannot hold a position for 10 seconds. Inability to hold the tandem stance for 10 seconds indicates an elevated fall risk.

Advanced and Instrumented Balance Testing

For more detailed or sensitive measurements, clinicians and researchers may utilize advanced technology and instrumented tests.

Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP)

CDP uses a force plate and a movable visual surround to measure postural sway in response to various sensory manipulations.

  • Methodology: Tests like the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) assess how well an individual uses visual, vestibular, and somatosensory information to maintain balance.
  • Benefits: It provides objective, quantitative data on balance deficits, helping to identify the specific sensory systems that are impaired.

Force Plate Measures

Force plates are considered the "gold standard" for measuring postural sway and stability during static standing tasks.

  • Methodology: A force plate measures the center of pressure (COP) and its movement. Postural stability is assessed by variables like sway velocity, path length, and the area covered by the COP.
  • Benefits: This method offers precise and reliable measurements of subtle changes in postural function that may not be visible in a clinical observation.

Comparison of Common Postural Control Tests

To highlight the different strengths and applications, here is a comparison of some popular postural control assessments.

Assessment Type of Balance Measured Required Equipment Best Used For Advantages Disadvantages
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Dynamic, functional mobility Stopwatch, chair, measuring tape Screening for fall risk and tracking functional mobility over time Quick, simple, minimal equipment, high clinical relevance Limited detail on specific balance deficits, heavily influenced by walking speed
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Static and Dynamic, functional Stopwatch, chair, step stool In-depth assessment of functional balance Standardized, high reliability, covers a wide range of tasks Takes more time, potentially less challenging for higher-functioning individuals
4-Stage Balance Test Static Stopwatch Quick, low-tech static balance assessment, especially for tandem stance stability Very simple and fast to perform, no specialized equipment needed Less sensitive to subtle balance issues, only assesses static balance
Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP) Static, Sensory Integration Specialized force plate, visual system Identifying specific sensory system deficits impacting balance Highly sensitive and objective measurements, isolates sensory contributions Expensive equipment, requires specialized setup, less functional context

Conclusion

No single test is sufficient for a comprehensive evaluation of postural control in the elderly. Instead, healthcare professionals must integrate multiple assessments to gain a holistic view of an individual's balance capabilities and fall risk. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) are among the most common tools used for initial screening and detailed functional assessment, respectively. Advanced techniques like Computerized Dynamic Posturography offer deeper insights into sensory deficits but require specialized equipment. Ultimately, the choice of test depends on the specific clinical goal, whether it is a quick screen, a detailed functional evaluation, or an analysis of specific sensory contributions to balance control.

Sources:

  • BMC Geriatrics - Age-related changes in postural control in older women
  • National Institutes of Health - Can the balance evaluation systems test be used to identify postural control impairments in older adults with chronic neck pain?

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary purpose is to assess an individual's risk of falling, identify specific balance deficits, and guide appropriate interventions to prevent falls and improve mobility.

The individual is timed as they stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters (about 10 feet), turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again. A longer duration indicates greater risk.

While the Berg Balance Scale was originally intended to predict fall risk, it is now primarily used to assess static balance and functional mobility. Other tests are often used in conjunction to get a more reliable fall risk prediction.

Static balance tests evaluate stability in a stationary position (e.g., standing still), while dynamic tests assess balance during movement (e.g., walking, reaching).

The 4-Stage Balance Test is a simple assessment of static balance that measures how long a person can hold four progressively difficult positions, from feet side-by-side to a single-leg stance.

Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP) uses a force plate and a visual screen to measure postural sway and isolate the contributions of different sensory systems to balance.

The Romberg test helps differentiate balance issues caused by proprioception deficits. It assesses sway while standing with eyes open versus closed; increased sway with eyes closed suggests a problem with proprioception.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.