Skip to content

Did people in the 50s suffer from diabetes? A historical perspective

4 min read

In the late 1950s, a U.S. National Health Survey estimated the prevalence of diabetes at around 9 cases per 1,000 people, starkly lower than today's rates, yet yes, people in the 50s did suffer from diabetes. The experience of living with the disease, however, was fundamentally different from what we know now.

Quick Summary

Yes, diabetes was present in the 1950s, though at significantly lower prevalence rates than today, with diagnosis relying on rudimentary urine tests and management relying on less refined insulin and newly emerging oral medications.

Key Points

  • Prevalence was Lower: Diabetes rates in the 1950s were significantly lower than today, though it was still a documented health issue.

  • Diagnosis was Inaccurate: Detection was crude and less accurate, relying on urine tests rather than today’s precise blood glucose monitoring.

  • Limited Treatment Options: While insulin was available for Type 1, it was less refined. Oral medications for Type 2 only became available later in the decade.

  • Lifestyle Provided Natural Protection: Daily life in the 1950s involved a healthier diet with less processed food and more physical activity, which provided some protection against chronic diseases.

  • Many Cases Likely Undiagnosed: Due to the less sophisticated diagnostic tools, it is probable that many cases of diabetes, particularly Type 2, went undetected.

  • Foundation for Future Treatments: The 1950s saw the development of longer-acting insulins and the first oral drugs, laying the groundwork for modern diabetes care.

In This Article

The Reality of Diabetes in the Mid-20th Century

While the sight of a modern-day diabetes clinic is common, many wonder about the past. Data from the 1950s, like the CDC's National Health Survey from 1957-1959, reveals an estimated 1.5 million cases in the United States, translating to a rate of 9 per 1,000 population. This figure is strikingly low compared to contemporary statistics, where prevalence has skyrocketed due to shifts in lifestyle, diet, and increased lifespan. Mortality data from 1950 also indicates that diabetes was a significant health issue, causing over 24,000 deaths that year, with specific mortality rates varying by age, gender, and region. The understanding of the disease was evolving, but its impact was clear.

Diagnosis and Monitoring: A Simpler, Less Precise Time

Today, a person with diabetes can monitor their blood glucose with a small device and a finger prick multiple times daily. This was a distant reality for those in the 1950s. Instead, monitoring relied on far more cumbersome and less accurate methods.

  • Urine Testing: The primary method involved a test tube, a chemical pill, and a heat source. The resulting color change indicated a range of sugar levels, from negative (blue) to high (orange). This method only provided a delayed, indirect snapshot of blood sugar, making precise control extremely difficult.
  • Doctor's Office Checks: Regular testing, often done only twice a day, occurred at the doctor's office, not at home. The lack of real-time data meant patients and physicians were flying blind, unable to make immediate adjustments to insulin or diet based on current glucose levels.

The Landscape of Treatment Options

Treatment in the 1950s, while significantly advanced from the pre-insulin era of forced starvation, was still primitive by today's standards. Patients were managing with limited tools and knowledge.

  • Insulin for Type 1 Diabetes: The discovery of insulin in the 1920s transformed the prognosis for Type 1 diabetes, turning a death sentence into a manageable condition. By the 1950s, longer-acting insulin preparations, like NPH, were available. However, insulin was derived from animal sources (pork and beef) and was not as pure as modern-day human insulin, which carried risks of allergic reactions and other complications.
  • Emerging Oral Medications for Type 2: The 1950s marked a pivotal moment with the introduction of the first oral antidiabetic medications, including sulfonylureas like carbutamide, in 1955. This provided the first real pharmaceutical option for managing Type 2 diabetes beyond diet and exercise.

Lifestyle and Environment: The Great Comparison

Several factors distinguished the health landscape of the 1950s from today, most notably lifestyle and environmental influences. These differences largely explain the current epidemic-level rise in Type 2 diabetes.

  • Dietary Habits: The 1950s diet was far less reliant on ultra-processed foods (UPFs), which are now a staple for many. Portion sizes were significantly smaller, and sugar was often consumed as an occasional treat rather than a daily staple. Some researchers even link wartime sugar rationing that ended in the mid-1950s to a lower risk of diabetes later in life for those exposed.
  • Physical Activity: A more active, less sedentary lifestyle was the norm. Fewer cars, fewer labor-saving devices, and less screen time meant that daily life involved more movement, a key protective factor against metabolic diseases.

A Historical Contrast: 1950s vs. Today

Feature 1950s Reality Today's Reality
Prevalence Low; estimated 9 cases per 1,000 population. High; significantly increased, with millions diagnosed and millions more prediabetic.
Diagnosis Primarily through imprecise urine tests done at a doctor's office. Through precise blood tests (e.g., A1c, fasting glucose), and is widely accessible.
Monitoring Infrequent and delayed, relying on qualitative urine testing. Frequent, real-time blood glucose monitoring at home (e.g., finger pricks, continuous glucose monitors).
Type 1 Treatment Animal-derived insulin (less refined), often with difficult-to-maintain dietary restrictions. Highly refined human insulin, sophisticated delivery systems (pens, pumps), and advanced meal planning.
Type 2 Treatment Limited to diet, exercise, and the initial introduction of oral medications post-1955. Advanced oral medications, multiple types of insulin, and a range of modern therapies.
Lifestyle Factors Lower consumption of processed foods, smaller portions, and higher daily physical activity. High consumption of processed foods, larger portion sizes, and more sedentary lifestyles.

The Modern Lessons from the Past

The history of diabetes in the 1950s teaches us valuable lessons. While medical technology has advanced immensely, the environmental and lifestyle shifts since then underscore the importance of foundational health behaviors.

  1. Diet and Portions: Eating real, unprocessed foods and managing portion sizes were standard practices that served as a natural defense against chronic illness. This is a lesson still relevant today.
  2. Activity is Key: The higher levels of daily activity, inherent in a less-mechanized world, provide a compelling argument for incorporating regular movement into our modern lives.
  3. Awareness Matters: The lower reported prevalence in the 1950s was partly due to less advanced diagnostic techniques, meaning many cases went undiagnosed. This highlights the importance of modern awareness and screening protocols.

In conclusion, while people in the 1950s certainly dealt with diabetes, their experience was vastly different due to lower prevalence, distinct lifestyle factors, and far less sophisticated medical tools. The dramatic rise in cases since that era serves as a powerful reminder of how modern living has impacted our health.

To learn more about the remarkable history and evolution of diabetes treatment, you can find a comprehensive timeline on the American Diabetes Association's website. The History of a Wonderful Thing We Call Insulin

Frequently Asked Questions

No, Type 2 diabetes was considerably less common in the 1950s. The surge in prevalence since then is linked to major shifts in diet, physical activity levels, and other environmental factors.

Monitoring was done primarily using urine tests performed at a doctor's office, not at home. This method gave an imprecise and delayed indication of blood sugar, making fine-tuned control difficult.

While insulin was available for Type 1 and was lifesaving, treatments were not as sophisticated as today. The first oral medications for Type 2 only appeared in 1955, and lifestyle management was a primary tool.

Both genetic predisposition (for Type 1 and Type 2) and lifestyle factors contributed to diabetes in the 1950s, though the modern understanding of its causes was still emerging.

Yes, on average, the diet in the 1950s consisted of fewer processed foods, smaller portion sizes, and less added sugar. This likely contributed to the lower rates of chronic diseases like Type 2 diabetes.

Before the discovery of insulin in the 1920s, a diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes was often a death sentence. By the 1950s, insulin improved prognosis, but management was still challenging due to less refined insulin and restrictive diets.

Studying the 1950s reveals the powerful impact of lifestyle, particularly diet and physical activity, on diabetes risk. It underscores how modern conveniences and food culture have significantly altered public health.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.