Skip to content

What is Bryan Johnson's biological age? Exploring the Longevity Scientist's Metrics

4 min read

According to his public updates in 2025, longevity entrepreneur Bryan Johnson, at a chronological age of 47, claims his biological age is several years younger, with some organs functioning at the level of a teenager. His intensive and expensive Project Blueprint regimen seeks to quantify and reverse the aging process in every part of his body. However, the concept of a single, definitive biological age is complex, and Johnson's results come with caveats and criticism.

Quick Summary

Bryan Johnson, chronologically 47, reports varying biological ages for his organs through his Project Blueprint. Using extensive biomarker tracking, he claims to have reversed his overall epigenetic age and slowed his aging rate. Critics question the generalizability and reliability of these single-subject findings.

Key Points

  • Organ-Specific Biological Ages: Bryan Johnson's biological age is not a single number but varies across his organs, with reported ages ranging from a mid-30s heart to an 18-year-old diaphragm.

  • Quantified Age Reversal: Johnson tracks his pace of aging using epigenetic clocks like DunedinPACE, claiming a slowing rate of 0.48, though this specific claim is disputed by some longevity experts.

  • Multi-Million Dollar Regimen: Project Blueprint involves an estimated $2 million annual investment in an extremely disciplined vegan diet, exercise routine, and numerous medical interventions and tests.

  • Scientific Scrutiny: Critics point out the 'N=1' problem of Johnson's self-experimentation, making his findings difficult to generalize or attribute to specific interventions.

  • Focus on Foundational Health: Despite his controversial methods, Johnson reinforces the importance of basics like diet, sleep, and exercise, which are accessible to everyone.

  • Fluctuating Metrics: Johnson has acknowledged that his biological age metrics can fluctuate, as evidenced by some reports of his age metrics temporarily increasing before dropping again.

In This Article

Understanding Bryan Johnson's Biological Age Metrics

Bryan Johnson, the multi-millionaire tech entrepreneur behind Project Blueprint, has become a public figure in the longevity space by subjecting himself to a hyper-regimented lifestyle monitored by a team of over 30 health experts. The core of his project revolves around measuring and reducing his biological age, a concept that reflects the functional state of a person's cells and organs rather than their chronological age. While his chronological age was 47 in early 2025, his body is not defined by a single biological age but rather a collection of organ-specific metrics.

Organ-Specific Biological Age

Rather than relying on one universal number, Johnson's medical team provides age estimates for individual organs and bodily functions, comparing his results to average metrics for different age groups. For example, in early 2025, he reported metrics for his heart, lungs, and other organs:

  • Heart: An estimated age in the mid-30s.
  • Diaphragm and lungs: Functioning like an 18-year-old.
  • Rectal tissue: Clinically evaluated as exceptionally young.
  • Skin: Aged around 28 to 42, showing significant reduction from an earlier, higher estimate.
  • Prostate: Approximately 30 years old.

However, not all parts of his body have responded as positively. Johnson has also transparently shared less favorable results, such as his left ear being biologically aged at 64 years old, likely due to childhood damage.

The Pace of Aging and Epigenetic Clocks

A key metric Johnson and his team track is the pace of aging using epigenetic clocks like DunedinPACE. Epigenetic clocks measure DNA methylation patterns, which are chemical tags on DNA that can indicate how fast or slow a person is aging at a molecular level.

In early 2025, Johnson claimed a pace of aging of 0.48, meaning for every calendar year that passes, his body ages just under six months. However, this specific claim has drawn sharp criticism from leading longevity experts like Dr. Morgan Levine, who argues that the metric is not meant to be used in this way and that Johnson's interpretation is unsubstantiated. While Johnson's data shows a reduction in his epigenetic age—which is a scientifically valid concept—experts caution against equating this with a definitive, years-for-years reversal of the aging pace.

Project Blueprint's Components and Cost

Johnson's efforts are driven by a strict, multi-faceted regimen that costs over $2 million annually and covers virtually every aspect of his health. The pillars of his protocol are designed to optimize biomarkers and push the boundaries of what is known about human longevity.

  • Nutrition: A precise 2,250-calorie-per-day vegan diet, often involving specific food combinations and nutrient-rich ingredients. He also sells some of these supplement formulas.
  • Supplementation: A wide array of supplements and medications based on extensive research and personal data.
  • Exercise: A daily, 60-90 minute routine of cardio and strength training, with his VO2 max placing him in the top percentile of 18-year-olds.
  • Sleep: A strictly enforced bedtime of 8:30 p.m. to ensure eight hours of high-quality sleep.
  • Medical Interventions: A range of cutting-edge and often controversial treatments, from penile shockwave therapy and cosmetic procedures to past experiments with blood plasma transfusions and gene therapy.

The Controversies and Critics

While Johnson's transparency is commended, his methods are highly scrutinized by the scientific community. Critics often point to several key issues:

  • N=1 Problem: As a single subject, his results are not generalizable to the broader population. His success could be influenced by genetics or other factors unique to him.

  • Cherry-Picking Data: Some reports suggest Johnson has selectively highlighted positive results while downplaying less favorable outcomes. The interpretation of complex epigenetic data has also been called into question.

  • Missing Controls: Because he uses numerous interventions simultaneously, it is scientifically impossible to determine which specific components are responsible for any observed effects.

  • Accessibility: The exorbitant cost and extreme nature of his lifestyle make it impractical and unaffordable for the vast majority of people.

Blueprint Protocol vs. Accessible Anti-Aging Habits

Feature Bryan Johnson's Blueprint Protocol Accessible Anti-Aging Habits
Cost ~$2 million annually for a comprehensive, personalized program. Free to low-cost habits, focusing on well-established health principles.
Monitoring Team of 30+ doctors, monthly MRIs, blood tests, and colonoscopies. Annual physical with a primary care physician and basic blood work.
Nutrition Precise, calorie-restricted vegan diet with specific, curated meals. Balanced diet rich in whole foods, fruits, and vegetables; moderate caloric intake.
Exercise Daily, 60-90 minute regimen of specific exercises for strength and cardio. Regular, consistent physical activity like walking, running, and strength training.
Supplements Numerous daily supplements and prescription drugs. Focused supplementation to address specific deficiencies as advised by a doctor.
Goal Reversing biological age and achieving peak biological function across all organs. Improving overall healthspan and reducing risk of chronic age-related diseases.

Conclusion

In early 2025, Bryan Johnson's reported biological age is not a single number but a complex set of metrics, with some organ functions rated as being decades younger than his 47 chronological years. While his rigorous, data-driven approach is unique, it is also highly experimental and comes with significant scientific critique. His project highlights the potential of lifestyle optimization and intensive monitoring, but it also underscores the limitations of generalizing results from a single, high-cost individual experiment. For the average person, the most valuable takeaway from Johnson's journey isn't the extreme measures, but the reinforcement of fundamental health practices like good nutrition, exercise, and sleep.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bryan Johnson and his team measure his biological age through extensive biomarker tracking, including epigenetic clocks based on DNA methylation patterns (like DunedinPACE), and clinical evaluations of his organs using blood tests, MRIs, and other diagnostics.

No, Bryan Johnson does not have a single biological age. He is described as being "hundreds of different ages" at once, based on the function of individual organs and systems. For example, his heart, skin, and diaphragm all have different biological age estimations.

Many scientists are critical because Johnson's project is a single-subject experiment (N=1), making his results not generalizable to others. They also question the interpretation of metrics like the 'pace of aging' and the difficulty of isolating the effect of any single intervention from his complex regimen.

Reports indicate that Bryan Johnson spends approximately $2 million per year on Project Blueprint, which covers his personalized diet, supplements, exercise equipment, and numerous medical tests and treatments.

Some of Johnson's most cited metrics include having the lung capacity of an 18-year-old, a pace of aging slower than 99% of 20-year-olds (a figure often disputed), and reduced inflammation levels.

Johnson's regimen includes experimental and high-cost treatments not widely validated for longevity, such as past plasma transfusions and certain drug combinations. Experts caution against replicating his methods without medical supervision due to potential risks and the lack of proven benefits for the general public.

Despite the extreme nature of his project, Johnson's journey emphasizes the importance of foundational health habits that are accessible to most people. These include prioritizing sleep, maintaining a healthy diet focused on whole foods, and engaging in regular exercise.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider regarding personal health decisions.